公共服务、外部性与工业集聚
|
摘要
本文在新经济地理学框架内,通过引入政府部门构建了一个空间均衡模型,理论研究表明,公共服务支出的提高可以促进工业集聚,并且受偏好的影响存在外部性,而集聚优势则通过循环累积因果关系进一步扩大。通过使用1999~2014年中国省际面板数据,检验了相关变量对工业集聚所产生的外部性影响,研究发现:公共服务、市场潜能均与工业集聚呈正相关,随着工业集聚程度的提高,公共服务对集聚的影响是递减的,反映了低集聚地区公共服务支出不足的现状,而市场潜能对集聚的影响存在一个上升的趋势。
Based on the framework of New Economic Geography,this paper constructs a spatial equilibrium model which contains the government sector.The theoretical research shows that the increase of public service expenditure has a positive effect on industrial agglomeration,and that effect has externalities by preference.The advantages of industrial agglomeration can further enhance by circular causation.It also uses provincial panel data of China from 1999-2014 to test the influence of externalities of related variables on industrial agglomeration.The empirical results show that:the public service and market potential are positively related to industrial agglomeration.With the increase of industrial agglomeration,the influence of public service on agglomeration has a diminishing effect which reflects the current situation of public service expenditure which is insufficient in low agglomeration areas,and the influence of market potential on agglomeration has an upward trend.
Based on the framework of New Economic Geography,this paper constructs a spatial equilibrium model which contains the government sector.The theoretical research shows that the increase of public service expenditure has a positive effect on industrial agglomeration,and that effect has externalities by preference.The advantages of industrial agglomeration can further enhance by circular causation.It also uses provincial panel data of China from 1999-2014 to test the influence of externalities of related variables on industrial agglomeration.The empirical results show that:the public service and market potential are positively related to industrial agglomeration.With the increase of industrial agglomeration,the influence of public service on agglomeration has a diminishing effect which reflects the current situation of public service expenditure which is insufficient in low agglomeration areas,and the influence of market potential on agglomeration has an upward trend.
引文
[1]Jovanovic M.N..Evolutionary Economic Geography:Location of Production and the European Union[M].Lodon:Routledge,2008
[2]罗能生,谭晶.区域产业同构对产业效率的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2016,35(2):81~89
[3]Krugman P.Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(3):483~499
[4]Combes P.,Mayer T.,Thisse J.Economic Geography:The Integration of Regions and Nations[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008
[5]Forslid R.,Ottaviano G.An Analytically Solvable CorePeriphery Model[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2003,3(3):229~240
[6]Martin P.,Rogers C.A..Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure[J].Journal of International Economics,1995,39(3-4):335~351
[7]Andersson F.,Forslid R.Tax Competition and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Public Economic Theory,2003,5(2):279~303
[8]Bucovetsky S.Public Input Competition[J].Journal of Public Economics,2005,89(9-10):1763~1787
[9]Fenge R,Ehrlich M.Wrede M.Public Input Competition and Agglomeration[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2009,39(5):621~631
[10]Becker J,Fuest C.EU Regional Policy and Tax Competition[J].European Economic Review,2010,54(1):150~161
[11]张望.政府公共服务、产业集聚与经济增长[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,(4):39~45
[12]踪家峰,朱佳佳.生产性公共支出真的会改变产业集聚格局吗?——基于新经济地理的分析[J].上海经济研究,2013,(2):3~12
[13]刘修岩,何玉梅.集聚经济、要素禀赋与产业的空间分布:来自中国制造业的证据[J].产业经济评论,2011,(3):10~19
[14]孙军.地区市场潜能、出口开放与我国工业集聚效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,(7):47~60
[15]赵增耀,夏斌.市场潜能、地理溢出与工业集聚——基于非线性空间门槛效应的经验分析[J].中国工业经济,2012,(11):71~83
[16]Harris C.The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1954,44(4):315~348
[17]Redding S,Venebles A J.Economic Geography and International Inequality[J].Journal of International Economics,2004,62(1):53~82
[18]Koenker R.Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data[J].Journal of Multivariate Analysis,2004,91(1):74~89
[2]罗能生,谭晶.区域产业同构对产业效率的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2016,35(2):81~89
[3]Krugman P.Increasing Returns and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(3):483~499
[4]Combes P.,Mayer T.,Thisse J.Economic Geography:The Integration of Regions and Nations[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008
[5]Forslid R.,Ottaviano G.An Analytically Solvable CorePeriphery Model[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2003,3(3):229~240
[6]Martin P.,Rogers C.A..Industrial Location and Public Infrastructure[J].Journal of International Economics,1995,39(3-4):335~351
[7]Andersson F.,Forslid R.Tax Competition and Economic Geography[J].Journal of Public Economic Theory,2003,5(2):279~303
[8]Bucovetsky S.Public Input Competition[J].Journal of Public Economics,2005,89(9-10):1763~1787
[9]Fenge R,Ehrlich M.Wrede M.Public Input Competition and Agglomeration[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,2009,39(5):621~631
[10]Becker J,Fuest C.EU Regional Policy and Tax Competition[J].European Economic Review,2010,54(1):150~161
[11]张望.政府公共服务、产业集聚与经济增长[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,(4):39~45
[12]踪家峰,朱佳佳.生产性公共支出真的会改变产业集聚格局吗?——基于新经济地理的分析[J].上海经济研究,2013,(2):3~12
[13]刘修岩,何玉梅.集聚经济、要素禀赋与产业的空间分布:来自中国制造业的证据[J].产业经济评论,2011,(3):10~19
[14]孙军.地区市场潜能、出口开放与我国工业集聚效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,(7):47~60
[15]赵增耀,夏斌.市场潜能、地理溢出与工业集聚——基于非线性空间门槛效应的经验分析[J].中国工业经济,2012,(11):71~83
[16]Harris C.The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1954,44(4):315~348
[17]Redding S,Venebles A J.Economic Geography and International Inequality[J].Journal of International Economics,2004,62(1):53~82
[18]Koenker R.Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data[J].Journal of Multivariate Analysis,2004,91(1):74~89