供应链治理模式选择:低控制还是高控制?——基于多元制度逻辑的实证研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Choice Mechanism of Supply Chain Governance Mode: Low Control or High Control? ——Empirical Research Based on Multiple Institutional Logics
  • 作者:张敬 ; 张志颖 ; 魏旭光 ; 康凯
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Jing;ZHANG Zhi-ying;WEI Xu-guang;KANG Kai;School of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Technology;
  • 关键词:供应链治理模式 ; 社会关系 ; 产权性质 ; 市场化进程 ; 多元制度逻辑
  • 英文关键词:supply chain governance mode;;social relationship;;property rights;;marketization process;;multiple institutional logics
  • 中文刊名:YUCE
  • 英文刊名:Forecasting
  • 机构:河北工业大学经济管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-27
  • 出版单位:预测
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.37;No.225
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(18BGL012,17CGL004,17BGL195);; 河北省社会科学基金资助项目(HB17GL034);; 河北省教育厅人文社会科学青年拔尖人才资助项目(BJ2017064)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YUCE201806004
  • 页数:8
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:34-1013/N
  • 分类号:28-35
摘要
突出我国正处于经济与制度转型的特殊情境,基于多元制度逻辑视角探究关系逻辑、政府逻辑与市场逻辑下供应链治理模式选择倾向及其背后原因。本文对117份有效调查问卷进行多层级有序概率回归分析,结果表明:供应链成员企业的商业关系与政治关系越强,越倾向于选择低控制治理模式;相对于国有企业而言,商业关系与政治关系对非国有企业治理模式选择行为的影响效果更明显;市场化改革有利于缓解商业关系、政治关系对供应链治理模式选择的影响强度。研究成果不仅为丰富本土供应链治理理论提供有效证据,而且为从政府管理与企业管理两方面促进我国供应链发展提供了新的科学依据。
        Highlighting the special situation of economic and institutional transformation period, this paper explores the choice mechanism of supply chain governance mode from perspectives of relationship logic, government logic and market logic based on institutional logic theory. The results of multi-level ordered probit regression from 117 valid questionnaires indicate that the stronger business relationship and political relationship of members within supply chain, the more inclining to choose low-control governance mode. In addition, the influence of business relationship and political relationship on the choice of supply chain governance mode is more significant compared with the state-owned enterprises, and the market-oriented reform effectively cushions the influence of business relationship and political relationship on the choice of supply chain governance mode. The results not only enrich local supply chain governance theory by providing effective evidence, but also provide new evidence to promote the development of supply chain from aspects of government management and enterprise management.
引文
[1] Gerwin D.Coordinating new product development in strategic alliances[J].Academy of Management Review,2004,29(2):241-257.
    [2] 李维安,李勇建,石丹.供应链治理理论研究:概念,内涵与规范性分析框架[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):4-15.
    [3] Williamson O E.Transaction-cost economics:the governance of contractual relations[J].Journal of Law & Economics,1979,22(2):233-261.
    [4] Combs J G,Ketchen D J.Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance:toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics[J].Strategic Management Journal,1999,20(9):867- 888.
    [5] DiMaggio P J,Powell W W.The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J].America Sociological Review,1983,48(2):147-160.
    [6] Greenwood R,Oliver C,Lawrence T,et al..The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism[M].2nd ed.Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publication,2017.1- 42.
    [7] 杜运周,尤树洋.制度逻辑与制度多元性研究前沿探析与未来研究展望[J].外国经济与管理,2013,35(12):2-10.
    [8] Thornton P H,Ocasio W,Lounsbury M.The institutional logics perspective:a new approach to culture,structure,and process[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2012.42- 44.
    [9] North D C.Institutions,institutional change,and economic performance[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1990.36-53.
    [10] 杨沁,扈文秀.企业并购中政府干预的动机与效果:综述与启示[J].预测,2016,35(5):74- 80.
    [11] Granovetter M.Economic action and social structure:the problem of embeddedness[J].American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
    [12] Marquis C,Raynard M.Institutional strategies in emerging markets[J].Academy of Management Annals,2015,9(1):291-335.
    [13] Putnam R.The prosperous community:social capital and public life[J].American Prospect,1993,13(13):12-35.
    [14] Peng M W,Luo Y.Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy:the nature of a micro-macro link[J].Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):486-501.
    [15] 康凯,张敬,张志颖,等.关系嵌入与风险感知对网络组织治理模式选择的影响研究[J].预测,2015,34(2):54-59.
    [16] 彭维刚.制度转型、企业成长和制度基础观[J].管理学季刊,2018,3(1):1-19.
    [17] 张维迎.市场的逻辑[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2010.20-25.
    [18] Peng M W.Institutional transitions and strategic choices[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296.
    [19] Peng M W,Zhou J Q.How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2005,22(4):321-336.
    [20] Wang L,Judge W Q.Managerial ownership and the role of privatization in transition economies:the case of China[J].Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2012,29(2):479- 498.
    [21] Roath A S,Miller S R,Cavusgil S T.A conceptual framework of relational governance in foreign distributor relationships[J].International Business Review,2002,11(1):1-16.
    [22] Chelariu C,Sangtani V.Relational governance in B2B electronic marketplaces:an updated typology[J].Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2009,24(1-2):108-117.
    [23] 林毅夫,刘明兴,章奇.政策性负担与企业的预算软约束:来自中国的实证研究[J].管理世界,2004,(8):81- 89.
    [24] 徐细雄,刘星.放权改革,薪酬管制与企业高管腐败[J].管理世界,2013,(3):119-132.
    [25] 曾萍,邓腾智,宋铁波.制度环境、核心能力与中国民营企业成长[J].管理学报,2013,10(5):663- 670.
    [26] Peng M W,Wang D Y L,Jiang Y.An institution-based view of international business strategy:a focus on emerging economies[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2008,39(5):920-936.
    [27] 王小鲁,樊纲,余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告(2016)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.43-57.
    [28] Alhstrom D,Young M N,Nair A,et al..Managing the institutional environment:challenges for foreign firms in post China[J].Advanced Management Journal,2003,68(2):41- 49.
    [29] Muthusamy S K,White M.Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances:a social exchange view[J].Organization Studies,2005,26(3):415- 441.
    [30] 吴绍棠,李燕萍.企业的联盟网络多元性有利于合作创新吗——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(3):152-160.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700