日本无赖派作家坂口安吾研究评析
|
摘要
坂口安吾是战后初期日本文坛的名家,也是日本无赖派的代表性作家,其与太宰治一同被日本学界称赞为日本无赖派文学的"双峰"。在文学叙事内涵上其秉承颓废堕落的艺术情调,在文学叙事手法上其坚持反传统,力图革新,在文学批评话语上其犀利批判传统和权威,主张民主和自由的思想,有力地促进了战后初期日本文学思潮的发展和转型。故中国学界和日本学界均热衷于坂口安吾的研究,并取得了一定的成果。但是由于各种因素的制约,其研究具有一定的局限性。因此,在研究坂口安吾这一问题上,应该将研究目标明确化,研究思路清晰化,研究重点突出化,研究方式多样化,研究内容丰富化,才能较为客观、准确地解析坂口安吾的叙事风格和批评价值取向。
Sakaguchi Ango is a famous writer in the early post-war period in Japanese literary circles and a representative Japanese writer of Buraiha School. Together with Dazai Osamu, he is hailed by Japanese academic community as the twin peaks of Japanese literature of Buraiha School. In the early post-war period he strongly promotes the development and transformation of Japanese literature ideological trend, for he inherits the artistic appeal of decadence in terms of narrative connotation, adheres to the anti-tradition and innovation in narrative technique, and advocates the thought of democracy and freedom and as well as the sharp critic to tradition and authority in literary criticism discourse. So both Chinese and Japanese scholars are full of enthusiasm about the study of Sakaguchi Ango and have made some achievements, though the research has certain limitations due to the restriction of various factors. Therefore, it is indispensable in the study of Sakaguchi Ango to clarify the research objective, explicate the research idea, emphasize the research focus, diversify the research methods, and enrich the research content. The paper aims to analyze the narrative style and critical value orientation of Sakaguchi Ango objectively and accurately.
Sakaguchi Ango is a famous writer in the early post-war period in Japanese literary circles and a representative Japanese writer of Buraiha School. Together with Dazai Osamu, he is hailed by Japanese academic community as the twin peaks of Japanese literature of Buraiha School. In the early post-war period he strongly promotes the development and transformation of Japanese literature ideological trend, for he inherits the artistic appeal of decadence in terms of narrative connotation, adheres to the anti-tradition and innovation in narrative technique, and advocates the thought of democracy and freedom and as well as the sharp critic to tradition and authority in literary criticism discourse. So both Chinese and Japanese scholars are full of enthusiasm about the study of Sakaguchi Ango and have made some achievements, though the research has certain limitations due to the restriction of various factors. Therefore, it is indispensable in the study of Sakaguchi Ango to clarify the research objective, explicate the research idea, emphasize the research focus, diversify the research methods, and enrich the research content. The paper aims to analyze the narrative style and critical value orientation of Sakaguchi Ango objectively and accurately.
引文
[1] 李德纯.战后日本文学史论[M].上海:译林出版社,2010.
[2] 任江辉.日本无赖派文学思潮评析[J].山西大同大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):58-59.
[3] 朱超奇.论坂口安吾的文学思想——以评论为中心[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2017.
[4] 任江辉.日本无赖派作家坂口安吾的文学观评析[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2015(3):105-106.
[5] 任江辉.日本无赖派文学思潮研究述评[J].淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(6):70-74.
[6] 靳明全.日本文论史要:现代部分[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2014.
[7] 任江辉.社会转型视域下的日本无赖派文学思潮研究[J].湖北社会科学,2015(12):118-120.
[2] 任江辉.日本无赖派文学思潮评析[J].山西大同大学学报(社会科学版),2013(2):58-59.
[3] 朱超奇.论坂口安吾的文学思想——以评论为中心[D].哈尔滨:黑龙江大学,2017.
[4] 任江辉.日本无赖派作家坂口安吾的文学观评析[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2015(3):105-106.
[5] 任江辉.日本无赖派文学思潮研究述评[J].淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(6):70-74.
[6] 靳明全.日本文论史要:现代部分[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2014.
[7] 任江辉.社会转型视域下的日本无赖派文学思潮研究[J].湖北社会科学,2015(12):118-120.