环境治理多元主体的政治博弈——以太湖治理为例
|
摘要
进一步厘清环境治理的主体构成框架,是积极推动中国生态文明建设的需要。环境政治具备创新的利益主体框架,包括政府、企业、社会、媒体及公众五类,与当前环境治理的价值诉求具有同一性,即实现真正的绿色变革。在环境与政治的博弈过程中,不同主体地位的不对等与力量的不均衡,以及不同主体在权力、利益以及价值选择上的博弈(失衡—再平衡—平衡),这些现象的产生有多重原因,而最主要的是环境政治框架下集权与分权的悖论。因此,党中央执政思维的绿化、生态法治政府的构建、生态环境行政监管体制的完善以及建设生态公民社会显得尤为重要。
To further clarify the main framework of environmental governance is an active response to facilitating the eco-civilization construction. Environmental politics, which has an interest body of innovation that falls into five categories of government, enterprises, society, media and the public, is in accordance with the value pursuit of the current environmental governance, that is, to realize the true green revolution. In the game between environment and politics, there appear the unequal status and imbalanced strength among different subjects as well as the fight for power, profit and value among them, which is a process of imbalance—re-balance—balance. There are many reasons for the above issues, but the most critical one lies in the paradox of centralization and decentralization in the framework of environmental politics. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for the Party Central Committee to have the green administrative concept, establish the ecology-oriented government by law, improve the administrative supervision system of ecological environment and build an ecological civil society.
To further clarify the main framework of environmental governance is an active response to facilitating the eco-civilization construction. Environmental politics, which has an interest body of innovation that falls into five categories of government, enterprises, society, media and the public, is in accordance with the value pursuit of the current environmental governance, that is, to realize the true green revolution. In the game between environment and politics, there appear the unequal status and imbalanced strength among different subjects as well as the fight for power, profit and value among them, which is a process of imbalance—re-balance—balance. There are many reasons for the above issues, but the most critical one lies in the paradox of centralization and decentralization in the framework of environmental politics. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for the Party Central Committee to have the green administrative concept, establish the ecology-oriented government by law, improve the administrative supervision system of ecological environment and build an ecological civil society.
引文
(1)郇庆治:《环境政治国际比较》,济南:山东大学出版社,2007年,第1页。
(2)这种主体划分法是基于目前国际社会的发展现状而进行的较为宏观的划分,不排除未来有新的主体被纳入其中。
(3)罗宾·艾克斯利:《绿色国家:重思民主与主权》,郇庆治译,济南:山东大学出版社,2012年。
(4)马克·史密斯、皮亚·庞萨帕:《环境与公民权:整合正义、责任和公民参与》,侯艳芳、杨晓燕译,济南:山东大学出版社,2012年。
(1)郇庆治:《环境政治视角下的生态文明体制改革》,《探索》2015年第3期。
(1)郇庆治:《环境政治学视野下的“雾霾之困”》,《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第1期。
(2)这种主体划分法是基于目前国际社会的发展现状而进行的较为宏观的划分,不排除未来有新的主体被纳入其中。
(3)罗宾·艾克斯利:《绿色国家:重思民主与主权》,郇庆治译,济南:山东大学出版社,2012年。
(4)马克·史密斯、皮亚·庞萨帕:《环境与公民权:整合正义、责任和公民参与》,侯艳芳、杨晓燕译,济南:山东大学出版社,2012年。
(1)郇庆治:《环境政治视角下的生态文明体制改革》,《探索》2015年第3期。
(1)郇庆治:《环境政治学视野下的“雾霾之困”》,《南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第1期。