我国科研人员数据引用行为特征分析
|
摘要
[目的/意义]文章以数据引文索引和中国知网数据及资源为基础,选取代表学科领域作为调研样本。尝试分析我国科研人员的数据引用行为特征,为我国数据引用规范化实践提供借鉴和参考。[方法/过程]通过人工标引,采用文献计量的方式从引用数据的类型、引用数据的层级、引用的元数据元素以及引用数据的形式等方面对我国科研人员的数据引用行为进行深入分析。[结果/结论]从中发现我国科研人员数据引用行为的特征:不同学科引用数据类型差异较明显,非原始数据的引用仍占较大比重,元数据元素的信息揭示程度不一,多种科学数据引用形式并存。
[Purpose/significance]Based on the DCI and the CNKI data and resources,this paper selects the representative subject area as the research sample.We try to analyze the characteristics of data citation behavior of Chinese researchers,and provide reference for the practice of data citation standardization in China.[Method/process] Using the method of bibliometric measurement and manual indexing to refer to the type of citation data,the level of the hierarchy,the referenced metadata elements and the form of the reference data provide an in-depth analysis of the data citation behavior of Chinese researchers.[Result/conclusion]From this,we find the characteristics of data citation behavior of Chinese researchers:the differences in reference data types in different disciplines are more obvious.Citation of non-primary data still account for a large proportion.The information disclosure of metadata elements is different,and multiple scientific data reference forms coexist.
[Purpose/significance]Based on the DCI and the CNKI data and resources,this paper selects the representative subject area as the research sample.We try to analyze the characteristics of data citation behavior of Chinese researchers,and provide reference for the practice of data citation standardization in China.[Method/process] Using the method of bibliometric measurement and manual indexing to refer to the type of citation data,the level of the hierarchy,the referenced metadata elements and the form of the reference data provide an in-depth analysis of the data citation behavior of Chinese researchers.[Result/conclusion]From this,we find the characteristics of data citation behavior of Chinese researchers:the differences in reference data types in different disciplines are more obvious.Citation of non-primary data still account for a large proportion.The information disclosure of metadata elements is different,and multiple scientific data reference forms coexist.
引文
[1] Data Citation Index SM[EB/OL].[2018-07-10].https://max.book118.com/h.
[2] 丁楠,丁莹,杨柳,凌晨,潘有能.我国图书情报领域数据引用行为分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(6):105-114.
[3] 王雪,马胜利,佘曾溧,杨波.科学数据的引用行为及其影响力研究[J].情报学报,2016,35(11):1132-1139.
[4] CSCD中国科学引文数据库[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://sciencechina.cn/cscd_source.jsp?type=2&cond=B.
[5] Appendix[EB/OL].[2018-02-13].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appendix_(anatomy).
[6] 标准附录[EB/OL].[2017-12-13].https://baike.so.com/doc/5655546-5868196.html.
[2] 丁楠,丁莹,杨柳,凌晨,潘有能.我国图书情报领域数据引用行为分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2014,40(6):105-114.
[3] 王雪,马胜利,佘曾溧,杨波.科学数据的引用行为及其影响力研究[J].情报学报,2016,35(11):1132-1139.
[4] CSCD中国科学引文数据库[EB/OL].[2018-03-22].http://sciencechina.cn/cscd_source.jsp?type=2&cond=B.
[5] Appendix[EB/OL].[2018-02-13].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appendix_(anatomy).
[6] 标准附录[EB/OL].[2017-12-13].https://baike.so.com/doc/5655546-5868196.html.