4种生物制剂对烟草根结线虫防治技术的研究
|
摘要
烟草根结线虫已成为攀枝花市烟区烟草的主要病害,对烟草造成严重的产量损失。为了筛选高效、安全的生物杀线虫剂,2017—2018年在攀枝花市仁和区干坝子村进行了4种不同生物杀线剂对烟草根结线虫防治的田间试验,通过防治效果、二龄幼虫虫口减退率校正防效、增产率等指标综合评价了供试生物制剂对烟草根结线虫的药效。结果表明:‘永卫~?168’水剂在防治效果、二龄幼虫虫口减退率校正防效、增产率方面综合表现最好,用药后120天对烟草根结线虫的防效为62.11%、虫口减退率校正防效为81.05%、增产效果高达53.08%,说明‘永卫~?168’水剂在烟草根结线虫防治中具有较好的推广应用前景。
Root-knot nematode has become the major threat to tobacco in Panzhihua, and caused serious yield loss. To screen biological agent with high efficiency and safety, a field experiment was conducted to determine the effect of four biological agents against tobacco root-knot nematode in Ganbazi, Renhe during 2017-2018.The efficacy was evaluated comprehensively through control efficacy, the correction control efficacy of the decline rate of the second-stage juveniles and the yield-increasing efficiency. The results showed that‘Yongwei~?168'agent gained the highest comprehensive performance with the control efficacy of 62.11%, the correction control efficacy of the decline rate of the second-stage juveniles of 81.05% and the yield increase effect of 53.08% 120 days after the treatment. Therefore,‘Yongwei~?168'agent has a good application prospect on controlling tobacco root-knot nematodes.
Root-knot nematode has become the major threat to tobacco in Panzhihua, and caused serious yield loss. To screen biological agent with high efficiency and safety, a field experiment was conducted to determine the effect of four biological agents against tobacco root-knot nematode in Ganbazi, Renhe during 2017-2018.The efficacy was evaluated comprehensively through control efficacy, the correction control efficacy of the decline rate of the second-stage juveniles and the yield-increasing efficiency. The results showed that‘Yongwei~?168'agent gained the highest comprehensive performance with the control efficacy of 62.11%, the correction control efficacy of the decline rate of the second-stage juveniles of 81.05% and the yield increase effect of 53.08% 120 days after the treatment. Therefore,‘Yongwei~?168'agent has a good application prospect on controlling tobacco root-knot nematodes.
引文
[1]孙桂玲,张广田,杨秀永.蔬菜线虫的为害及防治技术[J].中国果菜,2010(12):44-45.
[2]Oka Y.New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes[J].Pest Management Science,2015,56(11):983-988.
[3]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,官宇,等.猪屎豆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(9):136-140.
[4]祝明亮,张克勤,夏振远,等.烟草根结线虫生物防治研究进展[J].微生物学通报,2004,31(6):95-99.
[5]孔凡玉,王静.烟草根结线虫病研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2001,32(3):232-235.
[6]许灵杰,杜相革,翟欣,等.烟草根结线虫病研究概况及其防治措施[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013(12):153-157.
[7]张喆.云南烟草根结线虫的种类鉴定[D].广州:仲恺农业工程学院,2016:2-3.
[8]马文清.黔西南烟草根结线虫病调查研究[J].现代农业科技,2017(8):109-110.
[9]李星月,余辉,朱从桦,等.四川烟草根结线虫危害及其综合防控对策[J].四川农业科技,2018(2).
[10]黄金玲,陆秀红,李国栋,等.广西靖西县旱地烟草根结线虫病发生情况调查及防治措施[J].南方农业学报,2009,40(12):1561-1563.
[11]林森,武侠,王凤龙,等.定殖烟草根结线虫卵和雌虫机会真菌的多样性[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(10):1353-1358.
[12]谢胜利.山东省烟草根结线虫种类、生理小种鉴定及其根结线虫病综合防治技术的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2006:10-12.
[13]金娜.刘倩.简恒.植物寄生线虫生物防治研究新进展[J].中国生物防治学报,2015,31(5):789-800.
[14]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,官宇,等.猪屎豆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(9):136-140.
[15]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,陈寿明,等.孔雀草与淡紫拟青霉协同作用防治烟草根结线虫效果[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(30):87-89.
[16]韩治建,牛瑜德,杨宏星,等.不同打叶数量对秦巴山地烤烟等级结构及工业可用性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(31):27-32.
[17]聂海珍,孙漫红,李世东.棉隆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治番茄根结线虫病研究[A].中国植物保护学会2014年学术年会[C].2014.
[18]席先梅,白全江,张庆萍,等.5种生物制剂对设施蔬菜根结线虫防治技术研究[J].植物保护,2015(4):203-207.
[19]刘春艳,王万立,霍建飞,等.98%棉隆微粒剂防治黄瓜根结线虫田间药效试验[J].北方园艺,2011(23):128-130.
[20]万宇力,陆秀红,黄金玲,等.9种药剂对番茄根结线虫的盆栽防治试验[J].广西植保,2014(4):17-19.
[21]惠娜娜,马永强,王立,等.淡紫拟青霉、厚垣轮枝菌生防菌剂对当归“麻口病”的防治效果[J].植物保护,2015(4):199-202.
[22]刘峰,慕卫,张博,等.杀虫杀线剂防治蔬菜根结线虫病药效与安全性评价[J].农药,2002,41(12):29-31.
[23]刘霆,刘伟成,裘季燕,等.2%Agri-Terra颗粒剂防治番茄根结线虫[J].农药,2008,47(12):915-916.
[24]艾辉建,刘志明,黄金玲,等.几种杀线剂对南方根结线虫的田间药效试验[J].南方农业学报,2012,43(7):961-964.
[25]张弛,唐学军,蒋玉梅,等.3种不同药剂防治淮山根结线虫的药效试验[J].南方园艺,2015,26(5):20-21.
[26]吴慧平,徐劲峰.安徽省潜山县栝蒌根结线虫发生危害及大田药效试验[J].植物保护学报,2006,33(1):59-63.
[27]刘俊生,李媛,李英梅,等.温室黄瓜根结线虫病药剂防治技术研究[J].陕西农业科学,2010,56(1):74-77.
[28]张瑞平,曾庆宾,余伟,等.烟草根结线虫病不同防控措施的田间筛选[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(4):54-59.
[2]Oka Y.New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes[J].Pest Management Science,2015,56(11):983-988.
[3]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,官宇,等.猪屎豆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(9):136-140.
[4]祝明亮,张克勤,夏振远,等.烟草根结线虫生物防治研究进展[J].微生物学通报,2004,31(6):95-99.
[5]孔凡玉,王静.烟草根结线虫病研究进展[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2001,32(3):232-235.
[6]许灵杰,杜相革,翟欣,等.烟草根结线虫病研究概况及其防治措施[J].黑龙江农业科学,2013(12):153-157.
[7]张喆.云南烟草根结线虫的种类鉴定[D].广州:仲恺农业工程学院,2016:2-3.
[8]马文清.黔西南烟草根结线虫病调查研究[J].现代农业科技,2017(8):109-110.
[9]李星月,余辉,朱从桦,等.四川烟草根结线虫危害及其综合防控对策[J].四川农业科技,2018(2).
[10]黄金玲,陆秀红,李国栋,等.广西靖西县旱地烟草根结线虫病发生情况调查及防治措施[J].南方农业学报,2009,40(12):1561-1563.
[11]林森,武侠,王凤龙,等.定殖烟草根结线虫卵和雌虫机会真菌的多样性[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(10):1353-1358.
[12]谢胜利.山东省烟草根结线虫种类、生理小种鉴定及其根结线虫病综合防治技术的研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2006:10-12.
[13]金娜.刘倩.简恒.植物寄生线虫生物防治研究新进展[J].中国生物防治学报,2015,31(5):789-800.
[14]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,官宇,等.猪屎豆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治烟草根结线虫病的效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(9):136-140.
[15]闫芳芳,曾庆宾,陈寿明,等.孔雀草与淡紫拟青霉协同作用防治烟草根结线虫效果[J].安徽农业科学,2016,44(30):87-89.
[16]韩治建,牛瑜德,杨宏星,等.不同打叶数量对秦巴山地烤烟等级结构及工业可用性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2017,33(31):27-32.
[17]聂海珍,孙漫红,李世东.棉隆与淡紫拟青霉联合防治番茄根结线虫病研究[A].中国植物保护学会2014年学术年会[C].2014.
[18]席先梅,白全江,张庆萍,等.5种生物制剂对设施蔬菜根结线虫防治技术研究[J].植物保护,2015(4):203-207.
[19]刘春艳,王万立,霍建飞,等.98%棉隆微粒剂防治黄瓜根结线虫田间药效试验[J].北方园艺,2011(23):128-130.
[20]万宇力,陆秀红,黄金玲,等.9种药剂对番茄根结线虫的盆栽防治试验[J].广西植保,2014(4):17-19.
[21]惠娜娜,马永强,王立,等.淡紫拟青霉、厚垣轮枝菌生防菌剂对当归“麻口病”的防治效果[J].植物保护,2015(4):199-202.
[22]刘峰,慕卫,张博,等.杀虫杀线剂防治蔬菜根结线虫病药效与安全性评价[J].农药,2002,41(12):29-31.
[23]刘霆,刘伟成,裘季燕,等.2%Agri-Terra颗粒剂防治番茄根结线虫[J].农药,2008,47(12):915-916.
[24]艾辉建,刘志明,黄金玲,等.几种杀线剂对南方根结线虫的田间药效试验[J].南方农业学报,2012,43(7):961-964.
[25]张弛,唐学军,蒋玉梅,等.3种不同药剂防治淮山根结线虫的药效试验[J].南方园艺,2015,26(5):20-21.
[26]吴慧平,徐劲峰.安徽省潜山县栝蒌根结线虫发生危害及大田药效试验[J].植物保护学报,2006,33(1):59-63.
[27]刘俊生,李媛,李英梅,等.温室黄瓜根结线虫病药剂防治技术研究[J].陕西农业科学,2010,56(1):74-77.
[28]张瑞平,曾庆宾,余伟,等.烟草根结线虫病不同防控措施的田间筛选[J].中国烟草科学,2016,37(4):54-59.