想象竞合犯罪数评价标准的检讨与重构

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Review and Reconstruction of the Evaluation Criteria of Imaginative Joinder of Offences 作者：陈小彪 ; 王玲 ; 邹大宽 英文作者：CHEN Xiao-biao;WANG Ling;ZOU Da-kuan;School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science & Law;School of Public Administration,Central South University; 关键词：想象竞合犯 ; 罪数评价标准 ; 数罪并罚 ; 犯罪构成说 ; 行为说 ; 全面评价 英文关键词：imaginative joinder of offences;;criteria for the evaluation of crime;;combined punishment for several crimes;;the theory of constitution of crime;;behavior theory;;the principle of comprehensive evaluation 中文刊名：HBKS 英文刊名：Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences) 机构：西南政法大学法学院;中南大学公共管理学院; 出版日期：2017-06-26 出版单位：河北科技大学学报(社会科学版) 年：2017 期：v.17;No.66 基金：西南政法大学研究生硕士重点科研创新项目(XZYJS2014028);西南政法大学法学院研究生硕士科研创新一般项目(FXY2014092);; 中南大学2017年研究生自主探索创新项目(2017zzts015) 语种：中文; 页：HBKS201702008 页数：7 CN：02 ISSN：13-1303/G4 分类号：54-60

摘要

通说对于罪数评价标准采"犯罪构成说",而对想象竞合犯进行罪数评价时却偏向"行为说",标准相左的罪数评价导致混乱且有悖于罪刑法定原则和罪数的全面评价原则。改变理论困境须在罪数评价上真正坚持"犯罪构成说":在法无特殊规定时,保持评价罪数与处断罪数的一致性,即对想象竞合犯评价为数罪,除刑法和司法解释例外规定需要"从一重罪处断"的情形,均应实行数罪并罚。
        It is usually thought that the theory of "constitution of crime" is the criterion for the evaluation of crime.However,the criminal evaluation of imaginative joinder of offenses is biased towards " behavior theory",then punishing according to the heavier crime,the different criteria for evaluation leading to confusion and it is contrary to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and the principle of comprehensive evaluation of crime.Changing the theoretical dilemma must really adhere to the theory of "constitution of the crime" :maintaining the consistency of the number of evaluation crimes and the number of crimes to be punished,when there are no special provisions in the law,that is to say,imaginative joinder of offenses should be evaluated for a number of charges and punished by several crimes unless the criminal law and judicial interpretation exceptions require "punishing according to the heavier crime".

引文

[1]马克昌.犯罪通论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,1999.
    [2]刘宪权.罪数形态理论正本清源[J].法学研究,2009.
    [3]陈忠林.刑法总论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
    [4]高铭暄.刑法专论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
    [5]陈兴良.本体刑法学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
    [6]徐海峰.论想象竞合犯的若干问题[D].上海:华东政法大学,2010.
    [7]丁慧敏.想象竞合的功能及其存在根据[J].现代法学,2013.
    [8]刘士心.竞合犯研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2005.
    [9]赵丙贵,路军,王明辉.刑法竞合问题研究[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2013.
    [10]阮齐林.刑法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2008.
    [11](日)小野清一郎.犯罪构成要件理论[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004.