制度理论视角的院校声誉
|
摘要
院校声誉是高等院校作为特殊的社会组织所获得的社会大众信任和赞美的程度。从制度理论视角来看,院校之间的地位差异是院校声誉产生的前提,高等教育的本质和使命是院校声誉产生的根源,而院校与高等教育中心制度的距离及中心制度本身的变化导致了院校声誉的动态变化,院校声誉机制驱动远离中心制度的地方院校产生学术漂移。为营造健康的院校声誉环境,政府有责任对不良的院校声誉机制进行有效干预与矫正;同时,要慎用行政权力对院校的层次地位进行人为划分。院校在进行声誉管理、努力追求更高声誉时,要有所坚守,以办学质量与特色作为获得和提升声誉的根本。
The reputation of institutions of higher education refers to the degree of trust and praise that institutions of higher education receive from the public as a special form of social organization. Explaining the phenomenon of reputation of institutions of higher education from the perspective of institutional theory of organizational sociology,the common recognition of the status differences between institutions of higher education is the prerequisite for the emergence of reputation of institutions of higher education, that the essence and mission of higher education is the fundamental source of reputation of institutions of higher education, and that the distance between institutions of higher education and the central system of higher education and the change of the central system itself lead to the dynamic development of reputation of institutions of higher education. Change, the reputation mechanism of institutions drives local institutions away from the central system to produce academic drift. In order to create a healthy reputation environment for colleges and universities, the government should carefully use administrative power to artificially divide the hierarchical status of colleges and universities, and at the same time, effectively intervene and rectify the bad reputation mechanism of colleges and universities. In carrying out reputation management and striving for a higher reputation, colleges and universities should adhere to it and take the quality and characteristics of running schools as the basis for obtaining and promoting reputation.
The reputation of institutions of higher education refers to the degree of trust and praise that institutions of higher education receive from the public as a special form of social organization. Explaining the phenomenon of reputation of institutions of higher education from the perspective of institutional theory of organizational sociology,the common recognition of the status differences between institutions of higher education is the prerequisite for the emergence of reputation of institutions of higher education, that the essence and mission of higher education is the fundamental source of reputation of institutions of higher education, and that the distance between institutions of higher education and the central system of higher education and the change of the central system itself lead to the dynamic development of reputation of institutions of higher education. Change, the reputation mechanism of institutions drives local institutions away from the central system to produce academic drift. In order to create a healthy reputation environment for colleges and universities, the government should carefully use administrative power to artificially divide the hierarchical status of colleges and universities, and at the same time, effectively intervene and rectify the bad reputation mechanism of colleges and universities. In carrying out reputation management and striving for a higher reputation, colleges and universities should adhere to it and take the quality and characteristics of running schools as the basis for obtaining and promoting reputation.
引文
[1]舒颖岗.大学声誉培育与高水平大学建设[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2011(12):21-25.
[2][美]伯顿·克拉克.探究的场所--现代大学的科学研究和研究生教育[M].王承绪,译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001:247.
[3]赵德国,等.艾瑞深中国校友会网2017年中国大学排行研究报告[EB/OL].艾瑞深中国校友会网http://www.cuaa.net/.
[4][美]马丁·特罗.地位的分析[C].//[美]伯顿·克拉克.高等教育新论[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001(12):145.
[5]Clark,Burton R.The Higher Education System:Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective[M].Berkeley,CA:University of California Press,1983:165-166.
[6]蒋凯.声誉追寻下的大学迷思[J].大学教育科学,2018(06):4-12.
[7]张永宏.组织社会学的制度理论学派[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2007(07):4.
[8]陈学军.制度理论组织社会学视野下的教育组织研究[J].比较教育研究,2008,30(07):22-26.
[9]周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003(12).
[10]吴红斌,郭建如.高等教育分层系统中的地方本科院校:困境、优势与出路--基于全国本科学生调查数据的分析[J].中国高教研究,2018(02):75-82.
[11]闫树涛.近十年我国大学的组织演进:制度主义视角--基于省属重点综合性大学的案例研究[J].高校教育管理,2012,6(05):38-44.
[12]李维安,王世权.大学治理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2013:195-198.
[13]陈卓.大学声誉制度研究--基于制度主义的视角[J].中国高教研究,2016(03):73-79.
[14]张清,丁长峰.论高校声誉形成的基础与强化策略--一种制度的解释[J].黑龙江高教研究,2009(12):11-13.
[15]王占军.高等院校组织趋同行为的实证研究[J].中国人民大学教育学刊,2011(01):113-127.
[16]阎凤桥.大学的办学质量与声誉机制[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2012(12):16-20.
[17]教育部办公厅.关于加强高校毕业生就业信息服务工作的通知(教学厅[2013]5号)[EB/OL]http://www.gxgsxy.com/public/xgzx/gzzd/bwj/2018/07/11/17090231489.html.2013-04-16/2018-11-15.
[18]孙燕,胡弼成.“管办评分离”:大学走向善治的契机[J].大学教育科学,2015(05):13-18.
[19]余小波,陆启越,范玉鹏.“双一流”建设中引入大学社会评价机制的思考[J].大学教育科学,2017(06):26-31+120.
[20]林建华.理性认识大学排名在实现高等教育内涵式发展中的作用[J].中国高教研究,2018(01):1-3.
[2][美]伯顿·克拉克.探究的场所--现代大学的科学研究和研究生教育[M].王承绪,译.杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001:247.
[3]赵德国,等.艾瑞深中国校友会网2017年中国大学排行研究报告[EB/OL].艾瑞深中国校友会网http://www.cuaa.net/.
[4][美]马丁·特罗.地位的分析[C].//[美]伯顿·克拉克.高等教育新论[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2001(12):145.
[5]Clark,Burton R.The Higher Education System:Academic Organization in Cross-national Perspective[M].Berkeley,CA:University of California Press,1983:165-166.
[6]蒋凯.声誉追寻下的大学迷思[J].大学教育科学,2018(06):4-12.
[7]张永宏.组织社会学的制度理论学派[C].上海:上海人民出版社,2007(07):4.
[8]陈学军.制度理论组织社会学视野下的教育组织研究[J].比较教育研究,2008,30(07):22-26.
[9]周雪光.组织社会学十讲[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003(12).
[10]吴红斌,郭建如.高等教育分层系统中的地方本科院校:困境、优势与出路--基于全国本科学生调查数据的分析[J].中国高教研究,2018(02):75-82.
[11]闫树涛.近十年我国大学的组织演进:制度主义视角--基于省属重点综合性大学的案例研究[J].高校教育管理,2012,6(05):38-44.
[12]李维安,王世权.大学治理[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2013:195-198.
[13]陈卓.大学声誉制度研究--基于制度主义的视角[J].中国高教研究,2016(03):73-79.
[14]张清,丁长峰.论高校声誉形成的基础与强化策略--一种制度的解释[J].黑龙江高教研究,2009(12):11-13.
[15]王占军.高等院校组织趋同行为的实证研究[J].中国人民大学教育学刊,2011(01):113-127.
[16]阎凤桥.大学的办学质量与声誉机制[J].国家教育行政学院学报,2012(12):16-20.
[17]教育部办公厅.关于加强高校毕业生就业信息服务工作的通知(教学厅[2013]5号)[EB/OL]http://www.gxgsxy.com/public/xgzx/gzzd/bwj/2018/07/11/17090231489.html.2013-04-16/2018-11-15.
[18]孙燕,胡弼成.“管办评分离”:大学走向善治的契机[J].大学教育科学,2015(05):13-18.
[19]余小波,陆启越,范玉鹏.“双一流”建设中引入大学社会评价机制的思考[J].大学教育科学,2017(06):26-31+120.
[20]林建华.理性认识大学排名在实现高等教育内涵式发展中的作用[J].中国高教研究,2018(01):1-3.