摘要
对于进化理论与伦理学之间的关系,不同看法构成了一个连续谱,采取互相排斥立场的两端各有问题,而中间立场的成立需要应对自然主义谬误和休谟法则提出的挑战。对于实践判断的分析能为自然主义清除障碍,而针对婴儿的社会评价行为的系列实验在为基于进化论的伦理自然主义提供依据的同时,也表明一定阶段从进化剥离的认知能力对道德价值的塑造超脱了生物学说明的范围。
引文
[1]Thomas Nagel. Mortal questions[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1979.
[2]Michael Ruse. Evolutionary naturalism:selected essays[M].London&New York:Routledge,1995.
[3]Michael Ruse. Evolutionary ethics and the search for predecessors:Kant,Hume,and all the way back to Aristotle?[J].Social Philosophy and Policy,1990(8).
[4]George Edward Moore. Principia ethica[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1903.
[5]朱志方.价值还原为事实:无谬误的自然主义[J].哲学研究,2013(8).
[6]休谟.人性论[M].关文运,译.北京:商务印书馆,1980.
[7]Philip S. Gorski. Beyond the fact/value distinction:ethical naturalism and the social sciences[J].Sociology,2013(50).
[8]Philip Kitcher. Vaulting ambition:sociobiology and the quest for human nature[M].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1985.
[9]Richard D. Alexander. The biology of moral systems[M].New York:Aldine de Gruyter,1987.
[10]Robert Richards. Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
[11]Hamlin J. K.,Wynn K.,Bloom P. Threemonth-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations[J].Developmental Science,2010(13:6).
[12]Hamlin J. K.,Wynn K.,Bloom P. Social evaluation by preverbal infants[J].Nature,2007(450).
[13]Hamlin J. K.,Wynn K.,Bloom P. How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA,2011(108:50).
[14]平克.语言本能——探索人类语言进化的奥秘[M].洪兰,译.汕头:汕头大学出版社,2004.