宫颈癌螺旋断层放疗与静态调强技术的剂量学比较
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer
  • 作者:刘娟 ; 李双双 ; 高山宝 ; 闫婧 ; 侯震 ; 朱丽晶
  • 英文作者:LIU Juan;LI Shuangshuang;GAO Shanbao;YAN Jing;HOU Zhen;ZHU Lijing;Cancer Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University;Laboratory for Medical Electronics, State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering,Southeast University;
  • 关键词:宫颈癌 ; 放射治疗 ; 螺旋断层放射治疗 ; 调强放射治疗 ; 剂量学
  • 英文关键词:cervical cancer;;radiotherapy;;helical tomotherapy;;intensity-modulated radiotherapy;;dosimetry
  • 中文刊名:YXWZ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
  • 机构:南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院肿瘤中心;东南大学生物科学与医学工程学院生物电子学国家重点实验室医学电子学实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-25
  • 出版单位:中国医学物理学杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.186
  • 基金:江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20150102)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YXWZ201901006
  • 页数:6
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:44-1351/R
  • 分类号:29-34
摘要
目的:比较宫颈癌盆腔照射螺旋断层放射治疗(Helical Tomotherapy,HT)计划与七野-静态调强放疗(7F-IMRT)计划的靶区和危及器官的剂量学差异。方法:选取2015年3月~2017年10月行HT治疗的25例宫颈癌患者,均采用俯卧位,憋尿状态。分别进行HT和7F-IMRT两种计划设计,比较两种计划模式之间靶区和危及器官之间的剂量学参数及机器输出跳数。结果:(1)计划靶区(PTV):HT组CI和HI均优于7F-IMRT组,具有统计学差异(0.898±0.017 vs 0.834±0.013,P<0.001;0.062±0.012 vs 0.109±0.019,P<0.001);HT组PTV的D_1、D_2均低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001),D_(mean)、D_(98)、D_(95)均较7F-IMRT组高(P=0.048,P<0.001,P=0.015)。(2)对于正常组织,HT组小肠、结肠、直肠和膀胱的D_(max)、D_(mean)、V_(30)、V_(40)以及直肠V_(50)均显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.001,P=0.006),其余V_(50)略低,无统计学差异(P=0.130);HT组双侧股骨头V_(25)、D_5、D_(mean)、D_(max)也显著低于7F-IMRT组(P<0.001);但是,HT组的机器输出量明显高于7F-IMRT组。结论:HT计划在适形度、均匀性及周围正常组织保护上显著优于7F-IMRT计划,在充分保证靶区剂量的同时又不增加患者放疗毒副反应;但其机器输出量高于7F-IMRT计划,对射束的利用率不高。在后续治疗实施过程中,HT系统作为影像引导放射治疗技术,确保每次治疗过程中的精准度,值得临床应用。
        Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of target areas and organs-at-risk between helical tomotherapy(HT)and 7-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy(7F-IMRT)for cervical cancer.Methods Twenty-five patients with cervical cancer who underwent helical tomography between March 2015 and October 2017 were enrolled in this study.All enrolled patients were treated in prone position,with a full bladder.Both HT planning and 7F-IMRT planning were carried out for each patient.The dosimetry parameters of target areas and organs-at-risk,and monitor units(MU)were compared between two planning modes.Results HT plan was better than 7F-IMRT plan in conformity index and homogeneity index[0.898±0.017 vs 0.834±0.013,P<0.001;0.062±0.012 vs 0.109±0.019,P<0.001].The D_(1 )and D_(2 )of planning target volume in HT group were lower than those in 7F-IMRT group(all P<0.001),while D_(mean),D_(98)and D_(95)in HT group were higher than those in 7F-IMRT group(P=0.048,P<0.001,P=0.015).The D_(max),D_(mean),V_(30)and V_(40)of small intestine,colon,rectum and bladder and the V_(50)of rectum were significant lower(P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.001,P=0.006),and the V_(50)of the other organs-at-risk was slightly lower(P=0.130)in HT group as compared with 7F-IMRT group.Moreover,the V_(25),D_5,D_(mean)and D_(max)of femoral heads in HT group were significantly lower than those in 7F-IMRT group(all P<0.001).However,compared with 7F-IMRT group,HT group had a much higher MU.Conclusion HT plan which ensures the target dose without increasing the radiotherapy toxicity is superior to 7F-IMRT plan in conformity index,homogeneity index andorgans-at-risk sparing.However,the MU of HT plan is higher than that of 7F-IMRT plan,which indicates a lower utilization rate of beams in HT plan.As an image-guided radiotherapy technology,HT system is worthy of application for it can ensure the accuracy of each radiotherapy.
引文
[1]庞皓文,邱杰,全红,等.宫颈癌调强放疗中膀胱解剖结构变化及对其吸收剂量影响研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2011,20(3):218-221.PANG H W,QIU J,QUAN H,et al.A study on the changes of bladder anatomical structure and the effect on the absorption dose in the intensive radiotherapy of cervical carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology,2011,20(3):218-221.
    [2]DUE?AS-GONZALEZ A,CETINA L,CORONEL J,et al.New pharmacotherapy options for cervical cancer[J].Expert Opin Pharmacotherapy,2014,15(1):51-60.
    [3]PERALTA-ZARAGOZA O,BERMúDEZ-MORALES V H,PéREZ-PLASENCIA C,et al.Targeted treatments for cervical cancer:a review[J].Once Targets Ther,2012,5:315-328.
    [4]FEUVRET L,NOEL G,MAZERON J J,et al.Conformity index:a review[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(2):333-342.
    [5]BRAGG C M,CONWAY J,ROBINSON M H.The role of intensitymodulated radiotherapy in the treatment of parotid tumors[J].Int JRadiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52(3):729-738.
    [6]HODAPP N.The ICRU Report 83:prescribing,recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)[J].Strahlenther Onkol,2012,188(1):97-99.
    [7]EZZELL G A,GALVIN J M,LOW D,et al.Guidance document on delivery,treatment planning,and clinical implement of IMRT:report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy comraittee[J].Med Phys,2003,30(8):2089-2115.
    [8]LIU H H,WANG X C,DONG L,et al.Feasibility of sparing lung and other thoracic structures with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2004,58(4):1268-1279.
    [9]PAPP Z,CSAPóZ,MAYER A,et al.Wertheim-operation 5-year survival of 501 consecutive patients with cervical cancer[J].Orv Heti,2006,147(12):537-545.
    [10]BARTNIK M,RYDEN L,FERRARI R,et al.The prevalence of abnormal glucose regulation in patients with coronary artery disease across Europe:the Euro heart survey on diabetes and the heart[J].Euro Heart J,2004,25(21):1880-1890.
    [11]MUNDT A J,LUJAN A E,ROTMENSCH J,et al.Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2002,52(5):1330-1337.
    [12]PORTELANCE L,CHAO C,GRISBY P W,et al.Intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT)reduces small bowel,rectum and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and paraortic irradiation[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51(5):261-266.
    [13]陈亚正,黎杰,廖雄飞,等.VMAT和IMRT技术在乳腺癌根治术后放疗中的剂量学比较[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2014,27(5):226-230.CHEN Y Z,LI J,LIAO X F,et al.Dosimetric comparison between VMAT and IMRT for postoperative radiotherapy of breast carcinoma[J].Journal of Cancer Control and Treatment,2014,27(5):226-230.
    [14]杨美玲,黎静,李志强,等.螺旋断层放疗与常规放疗在全脑全脊髓照射中的剂量学比较[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2014,19(8):718-722.YANG M L,LI J,LI Z Q,et al.Dosimetric comparison between helical tomotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for cranio spinal irradiation[J].Chinese Clinical Oncology,2014,19(8):718-722.
    [15]KIM Y J,KIM J Y,YOO S H,et al.High control rate for lymph nodes in cervical cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy[J].Techno Cancer Res Treat,2013,12(1):45-51.
    [16]SCHWARZ J K,WAHAB S,GRIGSBY P W.Prospective phase I-IItrial of helical tomotherapy with or without chemotherapy for postoperative cervical cancer patients[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2011,81(5):1258-1263.
    [17]CHANG A J,RICHARDSON S,GRIGSBY P W,et al.Split-field helical tomotherapy with or without chemotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,82(1):263-269.
    [18]MARNITZ S,KOHLER C,BUROVA E,et al.Helical tomotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost after laparoscopic staging in patients with cervical cancer:analysis of feasibility and early toxicity[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,82(2):e137-e143.
    [19]杨宗霞,沈建通,李幼平,等.螺旋断层放疗系统治疗肿瘤的快速卫生技术评估[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(9):1052-1069.YANG Z X,SHEN J T,LI Y P,et al.Helical tomotherapy for cancer treatment:a rapid health technology assessment[J].Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine,2014,14(9):1052-1069.
    [20]LU S H,CHENG J C,KUO S H,et al.Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma:a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-andshoot IMRT[J].Radiother Oncol,2012,104(3):324-330.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700