技术人工物的意向性分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Analysis of the Intention of Technical Artifact
  • 作者:杨又 ; 吴国林
  • 英文作者:YANG You;WU Guo-lin;School of Marxism,South China University of Technology;
  • 关键词:技术人工物 ; 意向性 ; 人工智能
  • 英文关键词:technical artifact;;intentionality;;artificial intelligence
  • 中文刊名:ZRBZ
  • 英文刊名:Studies in Dialectics of Nature
  • 机构:华南理工大学马克思主义学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-02-18
  • 出版单位:自然辩证法研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.34;No.360
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“基于信息技术哲学的当代认识论研究”(15ZDB019)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZRBZ201802006
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-1649/B
  • 分类号:33-38
摘要
人工物的意向有"被指"和"能指"两种状态。前者涉及人工物的意向源及其变现问题,即人工物是人类意向的凝结物,其意向主要源于设计者和使用者,是设计者和使用者使其由虚在走向实在,由非存在走向存在。人工物的"被指"状态决定人工物的意向具有外生性。而现代人工智能的介入,使人工物的意向具有了内生性。但内生意向以外生意向作为基础。后者涉及人工物的意向功能问题,即当人工物被变现以后,它也必然会以上手状态而指向人们日常生活的实践,从而进一步实现人改造自我、他我以及世界的目的。
        Artificial objects have two states of intentionality: "being directed"and"directing to". The former involves the source of intention of artificial objects,that is,technical artifacts are the condensation of human intention. The intention mainly comes from designer and user. It is the designer and user that transfer intention to reality from a virtual one,and to existence from non-existence. Therefore,the intentionality of technical artifacts is exogenous.However,the intervention of modern artificial intelligence makes the intentionality of technical artifacts become endogenous. In addition,endogenous intention is based on the exogenous one. The latter involves the intentional function of artificial objects,that is,after the technical artifacts are created,they must be applied to practices of people's daily life with a ready state to further realize the purpose of improving ourselves,others and the world.
引文
[1]John R.Searle.Intentionality:An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.[M].Cambridge University Press,1983.
    [2]倪梁康.意向性:现象学与分析哲学(专题讨论)——现象学背景中的意向性问题[J].学术月刊,2006(6):47-50.
    [3]倪梁康.胡塞尔现象学概念通释(增补版)[M].北京:商务印书馆,2016.
    [4]吴国林.论分析技术哲学的可能进路[J].中国社会科学,2016(10).
    [5]Tripathi A K.Hermeneutics of technological culture[J].Ai&Society,2017,32(2):137-148.
    [6]Deborah G.Johnson.Computer systems:Moral entities but not moral agents[J].Ethics and Information Technology,2006(8):195-204.
    [7][法]斯蒂格勒.技术与时间:爱比米修斯的过失[M].裴程译.南京:译林出版社,2002.
    [8][美]拉里·西克曼.杜威的实用主义技术[M].韩连庆译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
    [9]Houkes W.Knowledge of artefact functions[J].Studies in History&Philosophy of Science Part A,2006,37(1):102-113.
    [10][美]约翰·R·塞尔.社会实在的建构[M].李步楼译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.
    [11]Newton N.Dennett on Intrinsic Intentionality[J].Analysis,1992,52(1):18-23.
    [12]Silver D,Schrittwieser J,Simonyan K,et al.Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge[J].Nature,2017,550(7676):354.
    [13][加]麦克卢汉.理解媒介:论人的延伸(增订评注本)[M].何道宽译.南京:译林出版社,2011.
    [14]http://tech.163.com/17/0119/18/CB5OFDR300098GJ5.html.
    [15]https://baike.baidu.com/item/Harmony/20419306?fr=aladdin.
    [16]Verbeek P P.Ambient Intelligence and Persuasive Technology:The Blurring Boundaries Between Human and Technology[J].Nanoethics,2009,3(3):231-242.
    [17]Nitsch V,Popp M.Emotions in robot psychology[J].Biological Cybernetics,2014,108(5):621-629.
    [18][德]韦尔策.社会记忆:历史、回忆、传承[M].季斌,王立君,白锡堃译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
    [19]海德格尔选集[M].孙周兴选编.上海:三联书店,1996.
    [20][美]罗尔.媒介、传播、文化.一个全球性的途径[M].董洪川译.北京:商务印书馆,2012.
    [21]技术哲学经典读本[M].吴国盛编.上海:上海交通大学出版社,2008.
    [22]唐旭昌.大卫·哈维城市空间思想研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2014.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700