论技术伦理生态转向的逻辑必然性
|
摘要
一个人信奉的价值观决定了他行为的动机、方式和行为后果。技术主体受到传统的人际技术伦理观的影响设计出来的现代技术,具有明显的反生态性,它既是导致生态危机的根本原因,自身又存在着无法解决环境问题的局限性。为此,技术伦理需要生态转向,形成和确立技术主体的生态伦理价值观,进而建构出合生态的技术,才能真正、有效地解决当前日益恶化的生态危机。就此而言,技术伦理的生态转向有其现实的逻辑必然性。
The values that a person believes in determine the motives,ways,and behavioral consequences of his actions.Modern technology,which is designed by the influence of traditional interpersonal technical ethics,has obvious anti-ecological characteristics.It is not only the root cause of the ecological crisis,but also has its limitations that cannot solve environmental problems.To this end,technical ethics requires an ecological turn,forming and establishing the ecological ethical values of the technical subjects,and then constructing ecological technologies to truly and effectively solve the current deteriorating ecological crisis.In this regard,the ecological turn of technical ethics has its logical necessity.
The values that a person believes in determine the motives,ways,and behavioral consequences of his actions.Modern technology,which is designed by the influence of traditional interpersonal technical ethics,has obvious anti-ecological characteristics.It is not only the root cause of the ecological crisis,but also has its limitations that cannot solve environmental problems.To this end,technical ethics requires an ecological turn,forming and establishing the ecological ethical values of the technical subjects,and then constructing ecological technologies to truly and effectively solve the current deteriorating ecological crisis.In this regard,the ecological turn of technical ethics has its logical necessity.
引文
[1]刘增文.关于生态系统概念的讨论[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003(6):204-208.
[2]巴里·康芒纳.封闭的循环[M].侯文蕙,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.
[3]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来[M].李小兵,谢京生,张峰,等译.北京:东方出版社,1995.
[4]肖显静.论技术的本质与环境保护[J].中国人民大学学报,2003(4):39-45.
[5]许欧泳.环境伦理学[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2002.
[6]拉兹洛.系统哲学讲演集[M].闵家胤,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
[7]杰里米·里夫金,特德·霍华德.熵:一种新的世界观[M].吕明,袁舟,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[8]陈昌曙.哲学视野中的可持续发展[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[9]詹献斌.对环境伦理学的反思[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997(6):24-29.
[10]大卫·格里芬.后现代精神[M].王成兵,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
[11]布鲁诺.论原因、本原和太一[M].上海:商务印书馆,1994.
[12]海德格尔.技术的追问[M].上海:上海三联书店,1986.
[13]尚东涛.“无报复自然界”:可能抑或不可能[J].自然辩证法研究,2002(5):1-3.
[14]纳什.大自然的权利[M].杨通进,译.青岛:青岛出版社,1999.
[15]罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野[M].刘耳,叶平,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.
[16]戴维·弗里切.商业伦理学[M].杨斌,石坚,郭阅,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
[17]万俊人.生态伦理学三题[J].求索,2003(4):149-153.
[18]艾伦比.工程、工业生态学——政策框架与实施[M].翁端,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[19]金涌,ARONSJ.资源·能源·环境·社会[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009.
[20]王前.现代技术的哲学反思[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2003.
[21]哈里斯,普里查德.工程伦理:概念和案例[M].丛杭青,沈琪,译.北京:北京理工大学出版社,2006.
[22]李文潮.技术伦理与形而上学[J].自然辩证法研究,2003(2):41-46.
(1)海德格尔语。
[2]巴里·康芒纳.封闭的循环[M].侯文蕙,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.
[3]E·舒尔曼.科技文明与人类未来[M].李小兵,谢京生,张峰,等译.北京:东方出版社,1995.
[4]肖显静.论技术的本质与环境保护[J].中国人民大学学报,2003(4):39-45.
[5]许欧泳.环境伦理学[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2002.
[6]拉兹洛.系统哲学讲演集[M].闵家胤,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
[7]杰里米·里夫金,特德·霍华德.熵:一种新的世界观[M].吕明,袁舟,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[8]陈昌曙.哲学视野中的可持续发展[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000.
[9]詹献斌.对环境伦理学的反思[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1997(6):24-29.
[10]大卫·格里芬.后现代精神[M].王成兵,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1998.
[11]布鲁诺.论原因、本原和太一[M].上海:商务印书馆,1994.
[12]海德格尔.技术的追问[M].上海:上海三联书店,1986.
[13]尚东涛.“无报复自然界”:可能抑或不可能[J].自然辩证法研究,2002(5):1-3.
[14]纳什.大自然的权利[M].杨通进,译.青岛:青岛出版社,1999.
[15]罗尔斯顿.哲学走向荒野[M].刘耳,叶平,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.
[16]戴维·弗里切.商业伦理学[M].杨斌,石坚,郭阅,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2005.
[17]万俊人.生态伦理学三题[J].求索,2003(4):149-153.
[18]艾伦比.工程、工业生态学——政策框架与实施[M].翁端,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[19]金涌,ARONSJ.资源·能源·环境·社会[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2009.
[20]王前.现代技术的哲学反思[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2003.
[21]哈里斯,普里查德.工程伦理:概念和案例[M].丛杭青,沈琪,译.北京:北京理工大学出版社,2006.
[22]李文潮.技术伦理与形而上学[J].自然辩证法研究,2003(2):41-46.
(1)海德格尔语。