摘要
预料不到的技术效果一直是创造性审查中的焦点和难点,如何厘清预料不到的技术效果与显而易见性之间关系是讨论已久的问题。在高分子化学领域中,由于表征手段多样性,往往会出现一个手段对应多个效果的情况,增加了显而易见性和预料不到技术效果判断的难度。本文以案例为依托,分三个层次论述高分子领域的审查中多个技术效果与显而易见性之间关系。
Unexpected technical effects have always been the focus and difficulty in inventiveness examination. In the field of polymer chemistry, as to the diversity of test characterization methods, resulting in technical means corresponding to multiple technical effects, increasing the judgment difficulty of unexpected technical effects against the obviousness. This article discusses the relationship between several technical effects and obviousness in patent examination in the field of polymer chemistry.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国国家知识产权局.专利审查指南[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2010.
[2]李越,王轶,杜国顺.预料不到的技术效果与专利创造性评判——从铁素体系不锈钢案不同审级呈现的不同评判方式说起[J].审查业务通讯,2015,21(6):24-36.
[3]叶青.创造性审查中对预料不到技术效果的考量[J].审查业务通讯,2014,20(11):65-68.
[4]姚正阳.浅谈创造性审查中技术问题的确定[J].审查业务通讯,2015,2,2(6):41-45.
[5]王铮,吴莹莹,宋春雷,等.创造性审查中如何确定“实际解决的技术问题”[J].审查业务通讯,2017,23(7):15-22.