专利侵权抗辩中“科学研究和实验”的适用规则——陆正明诉上海工程成套总公司、无锡市环境卫生工程实验厂专利侵权上诉案
|
摘要
《专利法》第69条第1款第4项是为了贯彻落实专利法的立法宗旨而在必要的限度范围内对专利权进行限制的规定。作为主流学说的"对象及目的限定说",将"专为科学研究和实验"的对象限定为专利技术本身,其目的限定为促进科学技术进步的科学研究和实验。本案中,人民法院首次采用了与"对象及目的限定说"相近的判断标准,对"专为科学研究和实验"这一要件进行了讨论,具有重要的意义。
In order to implement the purpose of Patent Law, article 69, paragraph 1(4) of the Patent Law set a necessary limitation on patent right. The mainstream theory, subjective and objective limitation theory, holds that the subject of the scientific research and experimentation shall be limited to the patented invention itself, and the objective of that shall be limited to the scientific research and experiments that promote scientific and technological advancement. In this case, the People's court presented an affinity criterion with the subjective and objective limitation theory on scientific research and experiment for the first time, which is worth discussion.
In order to implement the purpose of Patent Law, article 69, paragraph 1(4) of the Patent Law set a necessary limitation on patent right. The mainstream theory, subjective and objective limitation theory, holds that the subject of the scientific research and experimentation shall be limited to the patented invention itself, and the objective of that shall be limited to the scientific research and experiments that promote scientific and technological advancement. In this case, the People's court presented an affinity criterion with the subjective and objective limitation theory on scientific research and experiment for the first time, which is worth discussion.
引文
[1]尹新天.中国专利法详解[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2011:817.
[2]王迁.知识产权法教程[M].第5版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016:357.
[3]李扬.知识产权法基本原理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010:565.
1《最高人民法院公报》1993年第4期。
2 1984年制定的《专利法》中规定在第62条第1款第5项,2000年修订时变更为第63条第1款第5项,以及2008年修订时变更为第69条第1款第4项。
[2]王迁.知识产权法教程[M].第5版.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2016:357.
[3]李扬.知识产权法基本原理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010:565.
1《最高人民法院公报》1993年第4期。
2 1984年制定的《专利法》中规定在第62条第1款第5项,2000年修订时变更为第63条第1款第5项,以及2008年修订时变更为第69条第1款第4项。