不同循环饥饿-投喂策略对珍珠龙胆石斑鱼生长和水质的影响
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Effects of Different Feeding Models on the Growth of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus(♀)× E.lanceolatus(♂)and Water Quality
  • 作者:王润 ; 王晓龙 ; 田相利 ; 董双林 ; 李志凌 ; 韩笑冰
  • 英文作者:WANG Run;WANG Xiaolong;TIAN Xiangli;DONG Shuanglin;LI Zhiling;HAN Xiaobing;The Key Laboratory for Mariculture of Ministry of Education,Ocean University of China;Shandong Oriental Ocean Sci-Tech Co,Ltd;
  • 关键词:补偿生长 ; 投喂模式 ; 能量收支 ; 珍珠水胆石斑鱼
  • 英文关键词:compensatory growth;;feeding mode;;input and output of energy;;Epinephelus fuscoguttatus(♀)× E.lanceolatus(♂)
  • 中文刊名:HYFB
  • 英文刊名:Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology
  • 机构:中国海洋大学海水养殖教育部重点实验室;山东东方海洋科技股份有限公司;
  • 出版日期:2018-08-15
  • 出版单位:海洋湖沼通报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:No.163
  • 基金:山东省农业重大应用技术创新课题(鲁财农指[2013]136号);; 山东省杰出青年基金项目(JQ201009)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HYFB201804009
  • 页数:8
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:37-1141/P
  • 分类号:68-75
摘要
研究了不同饥饿-投喂策略对珍珠龙胆石斑鱼(Epinephelus fuscoguttatus♀×Epinephelus lanceolatus♂)的生长和能量收支的影响。实验包括3个处理:C(持续投喂);S1R3(饥饿1d,投喂3d);S1R7(饥饿1d,投喂7d);S1R11(饥饿1d,投喂11d)。实验在生产性水泥养殖池中进行,养殖池规格为6m*6m,水深1.1m,日换水率为400%,珍珠龙胆石斑鱼的养殖密度为18.3ind·m-2。研究结果表明,处理组S1R7和S1R11石斑鱼末体重与对照差异不显著(P>0.05),而S1R3处理鱼末体重则显著低于对照(P<0.05);3个处理石斑鱼特定生长率变化趋势与末体重相似,处理组S1R7和S1R11石斑鱼与对照差异不显著(P>0.05),而S1R3处理则显著低于对照(P<0.05);处理组S1R7和S1R11石斑鱼摄食率与对照相比差异不显著(P>0.05),S1R3则显著低于对照组(P<0.05);处理组S1R7和S1R11石斑鱼饲料系数与对照相比差异不显著(P>0.05),S1R3则显著高于对照组(P<0.05);从各处理水质状况比较,S1R3和S1R7处理各指标浓度总体上要显著低于对照组(P<0.05),但S1R11处理与对照差异不大(P>0.05)。综合生长和水质指标可以看出,适宜的饥饿-投喂策略并不影响珍珠龙胆石斑鱼的正常生长。在本研究条件下,饥饿1天,投喂7d的循环投喂模式下,珍珠龙胆石斑鱼生长与对照相比差异不大,表现出完全补偿生长效应,水质指标则明显优于持续投喂。这一研究结果对于珍珠龙胆石斑鱼工厂化养殖技术与管理水平的提高具有一定的参考价值。
        A multi-cycle recovery growth experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different feeding models on the growth of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus(♀)× E.lanceolatus(♂)and water quality.Four treatments were set in the experiment,which included(S1 R3)fish were starved for 1 day and then were fed to satiation for 3 days;(S1 R7)fish were starved for 1 day and then were fed to satiation for 7 days;(S1 R11)fish were starved for 1 day and then were fed to satiation for 11 days;and(C,the control)fish were fed to satiation during the whole experimental period.The results indicated that the weight gain rate and the SGR of the fish in S1 R7 and S1 R11 were similar to those of C(P>0.05);the weight gain rate and the SGR of the fish in S1 R3 was significantly lower than that in C(P<0.05);the feed coefficient was similar between S1 R11,S1 R7 and C,but the feed coefficient of S1 R3 is significantly lower than that of C;and as a whole,the water quality index of S1 R3 and S1 R7 was superior to that of C,but that of S1 R11 was similar to that of C.Considering the results of growth and water quality,suitable feeding model did not impact on the normal growth of Epinephelus fuscoguttatus(♀)×E.lanceolatus(♂).When the fish was starved for 1 day and then were fed to satiation for 7 days,the growth of the fish was similar to that of fish fed to satiation every day,but the water quality was apparently superior.Our findings advanced a solution for the industrial fish farming and raised the management level.
引文
[1]Turano M J,Borski R J,Daniels H V.Effects of cyclic feeding on compensatory growth of hybrid striped bass(Morone chrysops×M.saxitilis)foodfish and water quality in production ponds[J].Oxford.Aquaculture Research,2008,39(14):1514-1523.
    [2]Abolfathi M,Hajimoradloo A,Ghorbani R,et al.Compensatory growth in juvenile roach Rutilus caspicus:effect of starvation and re‐feeding on growth and digestive surface area[J].Malden.Journal of fish biology,2012,81(6):1880-1890.
    [3]Velázquez M,Zamora S,Martínez F J.Influence of environmental conditions on demand‐feeding behaviour of gilthead seabream(Sparus aurata)[J].Malden Journal of Applied Ichthyology,2004,20(6):536-541.
    [4]Bavcevic L,Klanjscek T,Karamarko V,et al.Compensatory growth in gilthead sea bream(Sparus aurata)compensates weight,but not length[J].Amsterdam.Aquaculture,2010,301(1):57-63.
    [5]Peres H,Santos S,Oliva-Teles A.Lack of compensatory growth response in gilthead seabream(Sparus aurata)juveniles following starvation and subsequent refeeding[J].Amsterdam.Aquaculture,2011,318(3):384-388.
    [6]Tian X,Qin J G.A single phase of food deprivation provoked compensatory growth in barramundi Lates calcarifer[J].Amsterdam.Aquaculture,2003,224(1):169-179.
    [7]Ali M,Nicieza A,Wootton R J.Compensatory growth in fishes:a response to growth depression[J].Hoboken Fish and fisheries,2003,4(2):147-190.
    [8]Huang G,Wei L,Zhang X,et al.Compensatory growth of juvenile brown flounder Paralichthys olivaceus(Temminck&Schlegel)following thermal manipulation[J].Malden Journal of Fish Biology,2008,72(10):2534-2542.
    [9]Eroldogan O T,Ta?bozan O,Tabako?lu S.Effects of restricted feeding regimes on growth and feed utilization of juvenile gilthead sea bream,Sparus aurata[J].Malden.Journal of the World Aquaculture society,2008,39(2):267-274.
    [10]Maclean A,Metcalfe N B.Social status,access to food,and compensatory growth in juvenile Atlantic salmon[J].Malden.Journal of Fish Biology,2001,58(5):1331-1346.
    [11]Blanquet I,Oliva‐Teles A.Effect of feed restriction on the growth performance of turbot(Scophthalmus maximus L.)juveniles under commercial rearing conditions[J].Oxford.Aquaculture Research,2010,41(8):1255-1260.
    [12]李样红,韩巍,等.珍珠龙胆高位池养殖技术研究[J].无锡.科学养鱼,2013(2):41-42.
    [13]高露姣,陈立侨,等.饥饿和补偿生长对史氏鲟幼鱼摄食,生长和体成分的影响[J].上海.水产学报,2004,28(3):279-284.
    [14]Wang Y,Li C,Qin J G,et al.Cyclical feed deprivation and refeeding fails to enhance compensatory growth in Nile tilapia,Oreochromis niloticus L[J].Oxford.Aquaculture research,2009,40(2):204-210.
    [15]房景辉,田相利,等.不同循环投喂模式对半滑舌鳎的生长,体成分组成,代谢和能量收支的影响[J].上海.水产学报,2011,123(031):420.
    [16]王永生.鱼类补偿性生长研究[J].青岛海洋水产研究,2002,23(3):57-61.
    [17]区又君,刘泽伟.千年笛鲷幼鱼的饥饿和补偿生长[J].上海水产学报,2007,31(3):323-328.
    [18]Abdel-Hakim N F,Al-Azab A A,El-Kholy K F.Effect of feeding regimes on growth performance of juvenile hybrid tilapia(Oreochromis niloticus×Oreochromis aureus)[J].Pakistan.World Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2009,5(1):49-54.
    [19]王华.投喂策略对工厂化养殖半滑舌鳎的效应特征与投喂模型构建[D].青岛.中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所),2009.
    [20]吴耀华,王成桂,等.不同投喂模式对龙虎斑生长的影响[J].广州.广东海洋大学学报,2015,35(6):21-25.
    [21]姜志强,贾泽梅,等.美国红鱼继饥饿后的补偿生长及其机制[J].上海.水产学报,2002,01:67-72.
    [22]Blanquet I,Oliva‐Teles A.Effect of feed restriction on the growth performance of turbot(Scophthalmus maximus L.)juveniles under commercial rearing conditions[J].Oxford.Aquaculture Research,2010,41(8):1255-1260.
    [23]阮国良,刘家芳,等.间歇性禁食对黄鳝生长,消化酶活性及血液生化指标的影响[J].上海.水产学报,2013,37(7).
    [24]李建,王琨,等.不同循环饥饿投喂模式对尼罗罗非鱼补偿生长的影响[J].上海.水产学报,2014,6:013.
    [25]王岩.海水养殖罗非鱼补偿生长的生物能量学机制[J].青岛海洋与湖沼,2001,03:233-239.
    [26]Kim M K,Lovell R T.Effect of restricted feeding regimens on compensatory weight gain and body tissue changes in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus in ponds[J].Amsterdam.Aquaculture,1995,135(4):285-293.
    [27]Reigh R C,Williams M B,Jacob B J.Influence of repetitive periods of fasting and satiation feeding on growth and production characteristics of channel catfish,Ictalurus punctatus[J].Amsterdam.Aquaculture,2006,254(1):506-516.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700