摘要
城市道路隧道矿山法施工下穿既有铁路,往往具有开挖断面大、地层变形影响范围大和需要严格控制路基沉降等特点。以某城市道路以隧道形式下穿既有二级铁路工程为依托,采用FLAC3D三维数值模拟手段,对比三台阶法和CRD法施工对路基沉降、边坡位移和支护结构内力的影响。数值计算表明,CRD法设置临时仰拱,分块成环、随挖随撑,相比于三台阶法,能更好地控制围岩位移,减小路基沉降和边坡位移,支护结构安全性较高。对本隧道下穿铁路施工而言,CRD法优于三台阶法。
The construction of urban road tunnels under existing railways by the mining method often has the characteristics of large excavation section, large influence range of stratum deformation and strict control of roadbed settlement. Based on the existing second-class railway project which a city road is constructed in the tunnel form, the subgrade settlement, slope displacement and the internal force of support structure are compared under the threestep method and CRD method by FLAC3 D software. The numerical calculation shows that, the CRD method can control the displacement of surrounding rock better, reduce the settlement of roadbed and slope displacement and improve the safety of supporting structures by setting temporary inverted arch, dividing into blocks and forming rings and supporting with excavation. The CRD method is superior to the three-step method in such case.
引文
[1]孙连勇,黄永亮,王启民,等.地铁盾构隧道下穿既有铁路变形控制研究[J].现代隧道技术,2018,55(5):140-145.
[2]阮雷,孙雪兵,申兴柱,等.新建盾构隧道施工对既有铁路路基的影响研究[J].铁道标准设计,2018,62(6):99-103.
[3]余凡凡,张国炎.新建隧道下穿施工对既有铁路的影响问题探究[J].中国水运,2017,17(3):216-217.
[4]岳岭.超浅埋铁路隧道小角度下穿铁路沉降控制技术研究[J].铁道标准设计,2012(8):80-82.
[5]贾蓬,赵文,周佳俊,等.浅埋铁路隧道下穿高速公路施工方法比选[J].北京工业大学学报,2014,40(8):1256-1262.
[6]赵巧兰,邬泽.莞惠城际铁路大断面矿山法隧道下穿高层建筑的影响分析[J].铁道标准设计,2012(s1),60-65.
[7]黄棠,王效通.结构设计原理[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1997.
[8]曹成勇,施成华,彭立敏,等.下穿高速公路的浅埋大跨隧道开挖力学行为分析[J].现代隧道技术,2017,54(5),122-128.
[9]贾杰南,刘腾隆,张静.基于FLAC3D的高速公路隧道两种开挖方式稳定性分析[J].水利科技与经济,2018,24(4):70-75.