积极的护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的临床意义研究
|
摘要
目的探讨积极的护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的临床意义。方法 80例耳鼻喉手术术后患者,随机分为试验组和对照组,每组40例。对照组患者采取常规护理,试验组患者在对照组的基础上使用积极的护理干预。比较两组患者术后的疼痛程度。结果术后1 d,两组患者疼痛评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后3、6 d,试验组患者疼痛评分分别为(2.36±0.25)、(1.23±0.36)分,均低于对照组的(3.01±0.21)、(2.96±0.12)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对耳鼻喉手术术后患者使用积极的护理干预可以明显降低患者的疼痛程度,提高患者的生活质量,值得在临床推广。
Objective To discuss the clinical significance of active nursing intervention for postoperative pain after otorhinolaryngology surgery. Methods A total of 80 patients with ear-nose-throat surgery were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the experimental group received active nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The pain degree after operation in two groups was compared. Results At 1 d after operation,both groups had no statistically significant difference in pain score(P>0.05). At 3 and 6 d after operation, the experimental group had lower pain score respectively as(2.36±0.25) and(1.23±0.36) points than(3.01±0.21)and(2.96±0.12) points in the control group, and their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Positive nursing intervention for patients after otorhinolaryngology surgery can significantly reduce pain degree and improve the quality of life of patients, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective To discuss the clinical significance of active nursing intervention for postoperative pain after otorhinolaryngology surgery. Methods A total of 80 patients with ear-nose-throat surgery were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group received conventional nursing, and the experimental group received active nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The pain degree after operation in two groups was compared. Results At 1 d after operation,both groups had no statistically significant difference in pain score(P>0.05). At 3 and 6 d after operation, the experimental group had lower pain score respectively as(2.36±0.25) and(1.23±0.36) points than(3.01±0.21)and(2.96±0.12) points in the control group, and their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Positive nursing intervention for patients after otorhinolaryngology surgery can significantly reduce pain degree and improve the quality of life of patients, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.
引文
[1]陶丽.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度观察分析.中国卫生标准管理,2015,6(31):229-230.
[2]范淑环,孟凡菲,施中伟.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度效果分析.中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(1):236-237.
[3]陈丽君.认知行为干预护理在减轻耳鼻喉部手术术后疼痛程度的应用体会.世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(30):265,271.
[4]丁丽英.心理护理在减轻耳鼻喉部手术术后疼痛程度的应用体会.实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(6):65,67.
[5]潘璟.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响观察.基层医学论坛,2014,18(24):3213-3214.
[6]黄小华.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响.深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(14):164-165.
[7]李硕.对行耳鼻喉部手术患者进行心理护理干预对减轻其术后疼痛的效果研究.当代医药论丛,2015(3):79-80.
[8]杨晓.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响.中国继续医学教育,2015,22(29):226-227.
[2]范淑环,孟凡菲,施中伟.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度效果分析.中国卫生标准管理,2016,7(1):236-237.
[3]陈丽君.认知行为干预护理在减轻耳鼻喉部手术术后疼痛程度的应用体会.世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(30):265,271.
[4]丁丽英.心理护理在减轻耳鼻喉部手术术后疼痛程度的应用体会.实用临床护理学电子杂志,2017,2(6):65,67.
[5]潘璟.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响观察.基层医学论坛,2014,18(24):3213-3214.
[6]黄小华.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响.深圳中西医结合杂志,2015,25(14):164-165.
[7]李硕.对行耳鼻喉部手术患者进行心理护理干预对减轻其术后疼痛的效果研究.当代医药论丛,2015(3):79-80.
[8]杨晓.综合护理干预对耳鼻喉手术术后疼痛程度的影响.中国继续医学教育,2015,22(29):226-227.