基于耦合协调度的煤炭行业高质量发展评价体系研究
|
摘要
为了定量测度煤炭行业发展质量,采用系统论视角,将煤炭行业看作是由经济、生态和安全3个子系统耦合而成的开放型耗散结构系统,构建了基于耦合协调度的煤炭行业高质量发展评价模型。选取山西省煤炭行业进行实证研究,分析了山西省2008—2017年间煤炭行业发展质量及其时序特征。结果表明:山西省煤炭行业发展质量总体呈上升趋势,耦合协调度由2008年的0.28提升到2017年的0.88;开展煤炭资源整合和坚持生态环境修复是山西省煤炭行业发展质量提升的主要经验;经济子系统发展滞后是山西省煤炭行业发展的短板。未来,山西省煤炭行业应继续开展煤炭资源整合和生态环境修复,鼓励和引导煤炭企业通过科技创新向产品价值链高端攀升。
This paper focus on the evaluation of high-quality development of coal mining industry from the perspective of system theory. Coal mining industry,as an open system,is a dissipative structure coupled by its subsystems,which mainly contain economy subsystem,ecology subsystem and security subsystem. A high-quality development evaluation model of the coal mining industry is constructed based on coupling coordination degree function. The entropy method was applied to ensure the objectivity of weight determination in evaluation model. Taking Shanxi Province,the famous coal-producing province in China,as an example,an empirical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the evaluation model. The temporal characteristics of development quality of coal mining industry in Shanxi Province from 2008 to 2017 was analyzed. Results showed that the development quality of the coal mining industry in Shanxi Province was on the rise generally. The coupling coordination degree increased from 0.28 in 2008 to 0.88 in 2017. Sticking to the coal resource integration and ecological environment restoration was the main experience of coal mining industry development in Shanxi Province. The development of economic subsystem was the shortcoming of coal mining industry in Shanxi Province. In the future,coal resource integration and ecological environment restoration of coal mining industry should be carried out permanently in Shanxi province. Meanwhile,coal mining enterprises should be encouraged to conduct scientific and technological innovation to climb up the product value chain.
This paper focus on the evaluation of high-quality development of coal mining industry from the perspective of system theory. Coal mining industry,as an open system,is a dissipative structure coupled by its subsystems,which mainly contain economy subsystem,ecology subsystem and security subsystem. A high-quality development evaluation model of the coal mining industry is constructed based on coupling coordination degree function. The entropy method was applied to ensure the objectivity of weight determination in evaluation model. Taking Shanxi Province,the famous coal-producing province in China,as an example,an empirical study was conducted to explore the efficacy of the evaluation model. The temporal characteristics of development quality of coal mining industry in Shanxi Province from 2008 to 2017 was analyzed. Results showed that the development quality of the coal mining industry in Shanxi Province was on the rise generally. The coupling coordination degree increased from 0.28 in 2008 to 0.88 in 2017. Sticking to the coal resource integration and ecological environment restoration was the main experience of coal mining industry development in Shanxi Province. The development of economic subsystem was the shortcoming of coal mining industry in Shanxi Province. In the future,coal resource integration and ecological environment restoration of coal mining industry should be carried out permanently in Shanxi province. Meanwhile,coal mining enterprises should be encouraged to conduct scientific and technological innovation to climb up the product value chain.
引文
[1]孙雨,张洪潮.转型视角下煤炭企业低碳绩效评价[J].煤炭技术,2017,36(10):317-318.
[2]KUSI-SARPONG S,SARKIS J,XUPING W.Green supply chain practices and performan-ce in Ghana's mining industry:a comparative evaluation based on DEMATEL and AHP[J].International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling,2016,8(4):320-347.
[3]李民,姚建明,吴阳.基于“资源--能力--市场”框架的煤电联营模式下煤炭企业竞争力评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(10):3-11.
[4]刘运辉,李国栋,李岩.煤炭产业国际竞争力评价指标层次结构模型研究[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,29(5):480-487.
[5]安景文,朱伟,李松林,等.基于拓展型BSC-FANP模型的煤炭企业绩效评价[J].统计与决策,2018,34(18):181-184.
[6]MUTINGI M,NANGOLO V,MUSIYARIRA H,et al.Adoption of Maintenance Key Performance Indicators in the Namibian Mining Industry[C]//.the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science,2016.
[7]江涛,王佟,宋梅.煤炭行业绿色矿山建设标准及其评价指标初步探讨[J].煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(1):1-7.
[8]张金锁,张伟,宋世杰.区域煤炭资源安全绿色高效开采评价指标体系与标准--以陕北侏罗纪煤田为例[J].中国煤炭,2015,41(6):49-54.
[9]曾贤刚,段存儒.煤炭资源枯竭型城市绿色转型绩效评价与区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(7):127-135.
[10]PURWANTO,WIHARJA H A.Fundamental Performance Towards Capital Structure in Coal Mining Industry[J].Advanced Science Letters,2017,23(8):7746-7749.
[11]王雷,吴璘.新时代我国煤炭产业高质量发展初探[J].煤炭经济研究,2018,38(10):11-17.
[12]宋晓波,杨涛,宋晓锋.新时代下煤炭行业高质量发展策略研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(12):163-167.
[13]周铸.坚持高质量推进煤炭产业健康发展[N].2019-03-15.
[14]张倩,彭亦廷.以环境规制推进煤炭企业高质量绿色发展--兼论改革开放40年来的环境规制发展历程[J].煤炭经济研究,2018,38(11):23-28.
[15]本刊评论员.40年,致力构建煤矿安全保障“铁三角”--煤炭工业改革开放40周年系列评述之二[J].中国煤炭工业,2018,(10):19-20.
[16]谢和平,刘虹.煤炭行业实施“走出去”战略的思考与建议[J].煤炭经济研究,2015,35(7):6-9.
[17]王雪芹,盛武.区域煤炭产业经济-资源-环境系统耦合协调发展分析[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(10):196-200.
[18]袁显平,姜一.我国煤炭业上市公司多元化经营与公司绩效的相关性研究[J].煤炭技术,2017,36(12):308-310.
[19]李晋平.大型煤炭企业高质量转型发展的探索与实践[J].煤炭经济研究,2019,39(1):4-10.
[20]STEMN E,BOFINGER C,CLIFF D,et al.Examining the relationship between safety culture maturity and safety performance of the mining industry[J].Safety Science,2019,(113):345-355.
[21]王国法,王虹,任怀伟,等.智慧煤矿2025情景目标和发展路径[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(2):295-305.
[2]KUSI-SARPONG S,SARKIS J,XUPING W.Green supply chain practices and performan-ce in Ghana's mining industry:a comparative evaluation based on DEMATEL and AHP[J].International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling,2016,8(4):320-347.
[3]李民,姚建明,吴阳.基于“资源--能力--市场”框架的煤电联营模式下煤炭企业竞争力评价研究[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(10):3-11.
[4]刘运辉,李国栋,李岩.煤炭产业国际竞争力评价指标层次结构模型研究[J].江苏科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,29(5):480-487.
[5]安景文,朱伟,李松林,等.基于拓展型BSC-FANP模型的煤炭企业绩效评价[J].统计与决策,2018,34(18):181-184.
[6]MUTINGI M,NANGOLO V,MUSIYARIRA H,et al.Adoption of Maintenance Key Performance Indicators in the Namibian Mining Industry[C]//.the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science,2016.
[7]江涛,王佟,宋梅.煤炭行业绿色矿山建设标准及其评价指标初步探讨[J].煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(1):1-7.
[8]张金锁,张伟,宋世杰.区域煤炭资源安全绿色高效开采评价指标体系与标准--以陕北侏罗纪煤田为例[J].中国煤炭,2015,41(6):49-54.
[9]曾贤刚,段存儒.煤炭资源枯竭型城市绿色转型绩效评价与区域差异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(7):127-135.
[10]PURWANTO,WIHARJA H A.Fundamental Performance Towards Capital Structure in Coal Mining Industry[J].Advanced Science Letters,2017,23(8):7746-7749.
[11]王雷,吴璘.新时代我国煤炭产业高质量发展初探[J].煤炭经济研究,2018,38(10):11-17.
[12]宋晓波,杨涛,宋晓锋.新时代下煤炭行业高质量发展策略研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(12):163-167.
[13]周铸.坚持高质量推进煤炭产业健康发展[N].2019-03-15.
[14]张倩,彭亦廷.以环境规制推进煤炭企业高质量绿色发展--兼论改革开放40年来的环境规制发展历程[J].煤炭经济研究,2018,38(11):23-28.
[15]本刊评论员.40年,致力构建煤矿安全保障“铁三角”--煤炭工业改革开放40周年系列评述之二[J].中国煤炭工业,2018,(10):19-20.
[16]谢和平,刘虹.煤炭行业实施“走出去”战略的思考与建议[J].煤炭经济研究,2015,35(7):6-9.
[17]王雪芹,盛武.区域煤炭产业经济-资源-环境系统耦合协调发展分析[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(10):196-200.
[18]袁显平,姜一.我国煤炭业上市公司多元化经营与公司绩效的相关性研究[J].煤炭技术,2017,36(12):308-310.
[19]李晋平.大型煤炭企业高质量转型发展的探索与实践[J].煤炭经济研究,2019,39(1):4-10.
[20]STEMN E,BOFINGER C,CLIFF D,et al.Examining the relationship between safety culture maturity and safety performance of the mining industry[J].Safety Science,2019,(113):345-355.
[21]王国法,王虹,任怀伟,等.智慧煤矿2025情景目标和发展路径[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(2):295-305.