摘要
[目的 /意义]分析《欧盟数字化单一市场指令提案》中著作权例外条款,以期为我国图书馆相关实践工作提供学术建议及启示。[方法 /过程]采用文献综述、案例分析、法理剖析及比较论证等研究方法,解读《欧盟数字化单一市场指令提案》中著作权例外条款,评析该类条款对我国图书馆界实践工作的影响及借鉴。[结果/结论]我国图书馆界应当在立法、政策以及实践层面有理有节地推动图书馆永久馆藏的数字保存、争取文献传递基于非商业性目的的合理使用以及引领文本与数据挖掘在参考咨询以及检索查新等实践工作中的广泛开展。
[Purpose/significance]By analyzing the EU Directive Proposal on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,this paper aims to provide academic implication on the protection of library-related public interest in China. [Method/process]Based on the research methods of literature review,case study,jurisprudential analysis and comparison,this paper testifies the application of the EU Directive Proposal in the library area in China. [Result/conclusion]Libraries in China shall together,not only in legislation but also in policy-making and practice,advocate a wide-range digital preservation of permanent collection,strive for the fair use of non-commercial based document delivery,and take lead in the extensive application of text and data mining in its existing and future services.
引文
[1]EUROPEAN COMMISSIN.Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the digital single market[EB/OL].[2016-10-05].https://ec.europa.eu/digitalsingle-market/en/news/proposal-directive-european-parliament-and-council-copyright-digital-single-market.
[2]EUROPEAN COMMISSIN.Impact assessment on the modernization of EU copyright rules accompanying the document proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the digital single market[EB/OL].[2016-10-05].https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/impact-assessmentmodernisation-eu-copyright-rules.
[3]徐轩,孙益武.英国数据挖掘著作权例外条款研究及其启示[J].图书馆建设,2015(9):10-14.
[4]茹丽洁,顾立平,田鹏伟.国际出版商对文本和数据挖掘限制的正当性辨析[J].图书馆建设,2016(7):27-33.
[5]李钢.大数据时代文本挖掘的版权例外[J].图书馆工作与研究,2016(3):28-31.
[6]王爱霞,王鸿信,王慧莹.试论在数字信息资源长期保存中《著作权法》的缺失与完善对策[J].情报理论与实践,2014(11):30-33.
[7]张炜,李春明.著作权法中的限制与例外对数字资源长期保存的影响研究[J].图书馆建设,2009(6):1-4.
[8]周玲玲.英国著作权限制与例外改革及其对我国图书馆的启示[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(6):21-25.
[9]EUROPEAN UNION.The treaty on European Union[EB/OL].[2016-09-22].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:FULL&from=EN.
[10]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonization of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society[EB/OL].[2016-09-22].http://eur-lex.europa.eu/search.html?qid=1475045129739&text=directive%202001/29/EC&scope=EURLEX&type=quick&lang=en.
[11]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs[EB/OL].[2016-10-11].http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=208108.
[12]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain permitted uses of orphan works[EB/OL].[2016-10-11].http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=13043.
[13]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property[EB/OL].[2016-10-10].http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/es/text.jsp?file_id=179834.
[14]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases[EB/OL].[2016-12-06].http://ec.europa.eu/archives/ISPO/infosoc/legreg/docs/969ec.html.
[15]EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT.Survey carried out in the context of the study on“assessment of the impact of the European copyright framework on digitally-supported education and training practices”[EB/OL].[2016-10-10].http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/assessment-of-the-impact-of-the-european-copyright-framework-ondigitally-supported-education-and-training-practicespb NC0115883/.
[16]SAMUELSON P.Possible futures of fair use[J].Washington law review,2015 90(2):815-868.
[17]NAUTA G.Survey report on digitization in European cultural heritage institutions 2015[EB/OL].[2016-06-15].http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Projects/Project_list/ENUMERATE/presentations/enumerate-report-core-survey-3-2015.pdf.
[18]王爱霞,王鸿信.中外数字信息资源保存相关法律制度之比较[J].图书馆,2016(6):85-89.
[19]郑文晖.高校图书馆文献传递服务版权保护及风险防范策略研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2016(7):36-40.
[20]IFLA.IFLA statement on text and data mining[EB/OL].[2016-12-05].http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/dm/statements/iflastatement-on=-text-and-data-mining.pdf.
[21]LIBER.LIBER statement on enabling open science[EB/OL].[2016-12-06].http://libereurope.eu/news/liber-state-menton-enabling-open-science/.
[22]于静.国际图书馆界对文本和数据挖掘权利的争取及启示[J].图书馆,2016(3):80-84.