人民陪审员职务行为责任研究
|
摘要
参照德国"核心领域"理论中对法官职务行为的划分,可将人民陪审员的职务行为分为"核心领域"范围内的职务行为和"外部秩序领域"的职务行为。基于陪审员制度的特殊性以及对司法责任制的监督范围、"核心领域"理论的理解,陪审员不应就相对内化的"核心领域"范围内的职务行为负责。为解决由此造成的合议庭内部法官与陪审员责任承担分配不均的矛盾,提出结果责任与行为责任相分离、事实审与法律审相分离的改革进路并进行比较研究。
Referring to the division of judges' professional behavior in German "core field" theory, jurors' professional behavior can be divided into "core field" within the scope of professional behavior and "external order field" of professional behavior. Based on the particularity of the jury system and the understanding of the scope of supervision and the theory of "core areas", jurors should not be responsible for their duties within the relatively internalized "core areas". In order to solve the uneven distribution of the responsibilities of judges and jurors in the collegial panel, this paper puts forward two reform approaches: the separation of responsibility for results and responsibility for conduct, and the separation of trial by fact and trial by law, and makes a comparative study.
Referring to the division of judges' professional behavior in German "core field" theory, jurors' professional behavior can be divided into "core field" within the scope of professional behavior and "external order field" of professional behavior. Based on the particularity of the jury system and the understanding of the scope of supervision and the theory of "core areas", jurors should not be responsible for their duties within the relatively internalized "core areas". In order to solve the uneven distribution of the responsibilities of judges and jurors in the collegial panel, this paper puts forward two reform approaches: the separation of responsibility for results and responsibility for conduct, and the separation of trial by fact and trial by law, and makes a comparative study.
引文
[1] 尹泽海.论法官职务监督与法官独立[J].河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2005(1):48-52.
[2] 王葆莳.德国法官惩戒制度研究[J].时代法学,2017(3):23-32.
[3] 梁玉霞.司法责任认定标准的二元论[J].暨南学报,2016(4):106-108.
[4] 陈卫东.司法责任制改革研究[J].法学杂志,2017(8):31-41.
[5] 樊传明.陪审员裁决能力问题研究:优秀的还是拙劣的事实认定者?[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(2):91-115.
[6] 常乐.博弈论视野中人民陪审员参审之决策机制分析与制度完善[C]//贺荣.尊重司法规律与刑事法律适用研究(上):全国法院第27届学术讨论会获奖论文集,北京:人民法院出版社,2016.
[7] 田圣庭.人民陪审员制度改革试点新问题研究[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(6):58-62.
[8] 《山东审判》编辑部.加强审判权监督制约,完善审判权运行机制:部分中级法院院长谈审判权监督制约[J].山东审判.2013,29(4):4-22,26.
[2] 王葆莳.德国法官惩戒制度研究[J].时代法学,2017(3):23-32.
[3] 梁玉霞.司法责任认定标准的二元论[J].暨南学报,2016(4):106-108.
[4] 陈卫东.司法责任制改革研究[J].法学杂志,2017(8):31-41.
[5] 樊传明.陪审员裁决能力问题研究:优秀的还是拙劣的事实认定者?[J].中国刑事法杂志,2018(2):91-115.
[6] 常乐.博弈论视野中人民陪审员参审之决策机制分析与制度完善[C]//贺荣.尊重司法规律与刑事法律适用研究(上):全国法院第27届学术讨论会获奖论文集,北京:人民法院出版社,2016.
[7] 田圣庭.人民陪审员制度改革试点新问题研究[J].信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(6):58-62.
[8] 《山东审判》编辑部.加强审判权监督制约,完善审判权运行机制:部分中级法院院长谈审判权监督制约[J].山东审判.2013,29(4):4-22,26.