基于跌置指数法的危险废物填埋场地下水污染风险评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Contamination Risk Assessment of Groundwater in the Landfill of Hazardous Waste Based on the Overlay and Index Methods
  • 作者:张伯强 ; 高柏 ; 安达
  • 英文作者:Zhang Boqiang;Gao Bai;An Da;School of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China Institute of Technology;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences;
  • 关键词:危险废物 ; 填埋场 ; 地下水风险评价 ; 迭置指数法
  • 英文关键词:hazardous waste;;landfills;;groundwater risk assessment;;the overlay and index methods
  • 中文刊名:GDHG
  • 英文刊名:Guangdong Chemical Industry
  • 机构:东华理工大学水资源与环境工程学院;中国环境科学研究院国家环境保护地下水污染过程模拟与控制重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2016-05-15
  • 出版单位:广东化工
  • 年:2016
  • 期:v.43;No.323
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(41162007;,41362011)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GDHG201609080
  • 页数:5
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:44-1238/TQ
  • 分类号:175-178+197
摘要
以江苏省某危险废物填埋场为研究案例,利用迭置指数法的风险评价方法综合考虑了以填埋场自身潜在风险、含水层脆弱性、风险受体暴露性为主的3个方面的影响因素,构建了包含16个评价指标的指标体系,分析了各评价指标的权重,并建立了综合指数风险评价模型。经计算,该危险废物填埋场地下水风险综合指标为4.682,参考危险废物填埋场地下水污染风险分级标准,得出该危险废物填埋场地下水污染风险等级为较低。将填埋场自身潜在性质、含水层脆弱性以及风险受体暴露性三方面综合考虑的地下水污染风险评价方法,不仅可为污染场地的防治提供科学依据,可以为场址的选择参考。
        Taking a hazardous waste landfill in Jiangsu Province as a case study, the use of risk-based assessment method superposed exponential law considers the potential risks to the landfill itself, aquifer vulnerability, risk exposure of the main receptor 3 factors aspect, constructs an index system containing 16 index, and analyzes the weight of each evaluation index weight, and the establishment of a comprehensive risk assessment index model. Calculated that the risk of groundwater hazardous waste landfill comprehensive index of 4.6823, with reference to hazardous waste landfill site under the Water Pollution risk classification criteria, obtained the hazardous waste landfill Water pollution risk level is low at the venue. Groundwater contamination risk assessment method to the nature of the potential landfill itself, aquifer vulnerability and risk exposure of the receptor in three areas considered, not only can provide a scientific basis, you can select the site as a reference for the prevention and treatment of contaminated sites.
引文
[1]李琴,蔡木林,李敏,等.我国危险废物环境管理的法律法规和标准现状及建议[J].环境工程技术学报,2015,5(4):306-314.
    [2]AN D,YANG Y,JIANG Y H,et al.A new risk ranking method for groundwater contamination of hazardous waste landfills in China[J].Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,2013,22(8a):2371-2378.
    [3]Uricchio V F,Raffaele G,Nicola L.A fuzzy knowledge-based decision support system for groundwater pollution risk evaluation.[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2004,73(3):189-97.
    [4]庞国兴,李金轩,杨强,等.Visual Modflow在甘肃某矿区地下水数值模拟中的应用[J].东华理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,32(4):307-312.
    [5]张丽君,2006.固有脆弱性因素与人类土地利用因素的乘积关系[J].水文地质工程地质,6:115-119.
    [6]滕彦国,苏洁,翟远征,等.地下水污染风险评价的迭置指数法研究综述[J].地球科学进展,2012,27(10):1140-1147.
    [7]刘增超,何连生,董军,等.简易垃圾填埋场地下水污染风险评价[D].吉林大学,2013.
    [8]张丽君.地下水脆弱性和风险性评价研究进展综述[J].水文地质工程地质,2006(6):113-119.
    [9]Saaty T L.The Analytic Hierarchy Process[J].Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Operational Research in the Basque Provinces,1980,4(29):189-234.
    [10]夏虹,黄彩.基于AHP和熵权法赋权的煤炭企业社会责任评价[J].东华理工大学学报:社会科学版,2014,33(3):209-212.
    [11]董亮,朱荫湄,胡勤海,等.应用DRASTIC模型评价西湖流域地下水污染风险[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(2):217-220.
    [12]Secunda S,Collin M L,Melloul A J.Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel's Sharon region[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1998,54(1):39-57.
    [13]刘淑芬,郭永海.区域地下水防污性能评价方法及其在河北平原的应用[J].石家庄经济学院学报,1996(1):41-45.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700