针灸联合推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效分析
|
摘要
目的探讨针灸联合推拿手法治疗治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效及其安全性。方法选取于2014年1月~2016年12月在我院接受治疗的300例神经根型颈椎病患者作为研究对象,按随机分配方式分为对照组和治疗组,各150例,对照组给予针灸疗法治疗,治疗组给予针灸联合推拿手法治疗,观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效、治疗前后VAS评分、不良反应等情况。结果治疗组总有效率为94.67%,对照组总有效率为83.33%,两组比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05);治疗组治疗后VAS评分与对照组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05),两组患者VAS评分治疗前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论针灸联合推拿手法治疗能改善神经根型颈椎病患者肩颈部疼痛、患侧上肢放射痛或麻木感、头晕头痛等症状,具有操作简便、损伤少、恢复快、疗效高等优点,且不良反应发生率低,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with massage manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type. Methods 300 patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type who were treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were selected as study subjects. According to the random assignment method, the patients were divided into the control group and the treatment group, with 150 patients in each group. The control group was given acupuncture therapy, and the treatment group was given acupuncture combined with massage manipulation. The clinical efficacy, VAS scores before and after treatment, as well as adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate was 94.67% in the treatment group and 83.33% in the control group. The difference was significant between the two groups(P<0.05);there was significant difference in VAS scores after the treatment between the treatment group and the control group( P < 0.05). There was statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the adverse effect rate between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Acupuncture combined with massage manipulation can improve the pain of shoulder and neck,radiating pain and numbness of upper limb pain, and dizziness and headache in the patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type, with the advantages of easy operation, less damage, fast recovery and high efficacy, as well as low incidence of adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with massage manipulation in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type. Methods 300 patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type who were treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were selected as study subjects. According to the random assignment method, the patients were divided into the control group and the treatment group, with 150 patients in each group. The control group was given acupuncture therapy, and the treatment group was given acupuncture combined with massage manipulation. The clinical efficacy, VAS scores before and after treatment, as well as adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate was 94.67% in the treatment group and 83.33% in the control group. The difference was significant between the two groups(P<0.05);there was significant difference in VAS scores after the treatment between the treatment group and the control group( P < 0.05). There was statistically significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups before and after treatment(P<0.05); there was no statistically significant difference in the adverse effect rate between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion Acupuncture combined with massage manipulation can improve the pain of shoulder and neck,radiating pain and numbness of upper limb pain, and dizziness and headache in the patients with cervical spondylosis of nerve root type, with the advantages of easy operation, less damage, fast recovery and high efficacy, as well as low incidence of adverse reactions, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
引文
[1]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,2016:189.
[2]林浩,崔松园,金文勇.针刺结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].健康之路,2017,16(2):218-219.
[3]李金明.针灸推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病33例[J].光明中医,2016,31(22):3324-3325.
[4]杨学涛,孙永涛.综合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病患者的临床效果[J].医疗装备,2016,29(16):119-120.
[5]庞青民.针灸联合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病20例[J].光明中医,2017,32(1):103-105.
[6]刘忠毅.针灸联合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病45例临床观察[J].云南中医中药杂志,2016,37(7):73-74.
[7]彭文琦.针灸结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].实用中医药杂志,2016,32(11):1127-1128.
[8]王巨庆.经筋推拿结合微火针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,26(5):460-462.
[9]茹光普.葛根汤联合推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].北方药学,2017,14(2):41.
[10]郭豪,郭志坤.中医手法治疗神经根型颈椎病研究进展[J].长春中医药大学学报,2012,28(4):734-735.
[11]李乾,高扬,陈昌欢,等.推拿结合复方麝香按摩凝胶治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2017,39(4):46-48.
[12]朱有生,林健.中医药治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].实用中西医结合临床,2016,16(9):91-94.
[13]李思斌,袁绘,李正祥,等.脊柱微调手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(8):116-118.
[14]杨秀芳.观察神经根型颈椎病运用针灸推拿治疗的临床效果[J].医药前沿,2017,7(11):24-25.
[15]杨松.推拿联合针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病效果观察[J].中国乡村医药,2015,22(24):44-46.
[16]秦淑钏.针灸结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效观察[J].航空军医,2017,45(2):120-121.
[17]李金明.针灸推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病33例[J].光明中医,2016,31(22):3324-3325.
[18]余清云.中医推拿结合针灸治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效分析[J].当代医学,2016,22(1):156-157.
[19]邬宗祥.针灸配合推拿和牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病临床效果观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,3:118-119.
[20]周小丽.按摩推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].医药前沿,2017,7(5):361-362.
[2]林浩,崔松园,金文勇.针刺结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].健康之路,2017,16(2):218-219.
[3]李金明.针灸推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病33例[J].光明中医,2016,31(22):3324-3325.
[4]杨学涛,孙永涛.综合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病患者的临床效果[J].医疗装备,2016,29(16):119-120.
[5]庞青民.针灸联合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病20例[J].光明中医,2017,32(1):103-105.
[6]刘忠毅.针灸联合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病45例临床观察[J].云南中医中药杂志,2016,37(7):73-74.
[7]彭文琦.针灸结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].实用中医药杂志,2016,32(11):1127-1128.
[8]王巨庆.经筋推拿结合微火针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2016,26(5):460-462.
[9]茹光普.葛根汤联合推拿手法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].北方药学,2017,14(2):41.
[10]郭豪,郭志坤.中医手法治疗神经根型颈椎病研究进展[J].长春中医药大学学报,2012,28(4):734-735.
[11]李乾,高扬,陈昌欢,等.推拿结合复方麝香按摩凝胶治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].湖北中医杂志,2017,39(4):46-48.
[12]朱有生,林健.中医药治疗神经根型颈椎病的研究进展[J].实用中西医结合临床,2016,16(9):91-94.
[13]李思斌,袁绘,李正祥,等.脊柱微调手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(8):116-118.
[14]杨秀芳.观察神经根型颈椎病运用针灸推拿治疗的临床效果[J].医药前沿,2017,7(11):24-25.
[15]杨松.推拿联合针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病效果观察[J].中国乡村医药,2015,22(24):44-46.
[16]秦淑钏.针灸结合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效观察[J].航空军医,2017,45(2):120-121.
[17]李金明.针灸推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病33例[J].光明中医,2016,31(22):3324-3325.
[18]余清云.中医推拿结合针灸治疗神经根型颈椎病临床疗效分析[J].当代医学,2016,22(1):156-157.
[19]邬宗祥.针灸配合推拿和牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病临床效果观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,3:118-119.
[20]周小丽.按摩推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].医药前沿,2017,7(5):361-362.