损伤控制骨科在创伤骨科中的应用效果分析
|
摘要
目的探讨创伤骨科中实施损伤控制骨科的效果。方法以我院收治的142例骨创伤患者为研究对象,以入院先后顺序分为两组,治疗组(71例)实施损伤控制性治疗,对照组(71例)实施常规创伤性手术治疗,比较两组治疗后的临床效果、并发症发生情况,以及治疗前后的疼痛程度评分。结果治疗后,治疗组的总有效率显著高于对照组,并发症发生率显著低于对照组,疼痛评分显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对骨创伤患者实施损伤控制治疗,可以显著提高治疗效果,缓解患者的疼痛,有效减少并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To explore the effect of damage control orthopedics in the traumatic orthopedics department. Methods 142 cases of patients with bone trauma admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects. According to the order of admission, all patients were divided into the treatment group(damage control treatment, n = 71) and the control group(conventional traumatic surgery, n =71). The clinical effect and incidence of complications after treatment, and the pain degree scores before and after treatment were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group,the incidence of complications was significantly lower than that of control group, and the score of pain degree was significantly lower than that of control group(all P <0.05). Conclusions Damage control treatment applied in patients with bone trauma can obviously improve the curative effect, relieve patients' pain, and effectively reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
Objective To explore the effect of damage control orthopedics in the traumatic orthopedics department. Methods 142 cases of patients with bone trauma admitted to our hospital were selected as research objects. According to the order of admission, all patients were divided into the treatment group(damage control treatment, n = 71) and the control group(conventional traumatic surgery, n =71). The clinical effect and incidence of complications after treatment, and the pain degree scores before and after treatment were compared between two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group,the incidence of complications was significantly lower than that of control group, and the score of pain degree was significantly lower than that of control group(all P <0.05). Conclusions Damage control treatment applied in patients with bone trauma can obviously improve the curative effect, relieve patients' pain, and effectively reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.
引文
[1]韩瑞明.外固定支架结合损伤控制理念在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].河南医学研究,2017,26(14):2620-2621.
[2]张强,王金山,张镇江,等.外固定支架-行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J/CD].中西医结合心血管病杂志(电子版),2016,4(28):185-186.
[3]邵旭辉.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用效果分析[J].当代医学,2016,22(21):28-29.
[4]周大为,姜绍帅.损伤控制理论在创伤骨科救治领域的应用[J].黑龙江医药,2016,29(1):127-128.
[5]宋长利,金述涛,夏楠.外固定支架-行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].航空航天医学杂志,2016,27(1):6-8.
[6]陈宇斐.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用效果分析[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(14):192-194.
[7]黄劲东,陈伟强,卜波,等.外固定支架行损伤控制治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].中国临床新医学,2013,6(11):1077-1079.
[8]展宝明,谢学升,谷增泉.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用[J].医药论坛杂志,2013,34(3):29-30,33.
[9]蒋苏漳.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(2):501-502.
[10]巴音额古乐.损伤控制骨科理念在创伤骨科中的应用[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2011,43(6):677-679.
[11]程勇.外固定支架在创伤骨科严重粉碎性骨折,多发性骨折中的应用和疗效分析[J].临床医学工程,2013,20(12):1533-1534.
[2]张强,王金山,张镇江,等.外固定支架-行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J/CD].中西医结合心血管病杂志(电子版),2016,4(28):185-186.
[3]邵旭辉.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用效果分析[J].当代医学,2016,22(21):28-29.
[4]周大为,姜绍帅.损伤控制理论在创伤骨科救治领域的应用[J].黑龙江医药,2016,29(1):127-128.
[5]宋长利,金述涛,夏楠.外固定支架-行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].航空航天医学杂志,2016,27(1):6-8.
[6]陈宇斐.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用效果分析[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(14):192-194.
[7]黄劲东,陈伟强,卜波,等.外固定支架行损伤控制治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].中国临床新医学,2013,6(11):1077-1079.
[8]展宝明,谢学升,谷增泉.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用[J].医药论坛杂志,2013,34(3):29-30,33.
[9]蒋苏漳.外固定支架进行损伤控制性治疗在创伤骨科修复中的应用[J].中国医药指南,2013,11(2):501-502.
[10]巴音额古乐.损伤控制骨科理念在创伤骨科中的应用[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2011,43(6):677-679.
[11]程勇.外固定支架在创伤骨科严重粉碎性骨折,多发性骨折中的应用和疗效分析[J].临床医学工程,2013,20(12):1533-1534.