强度石漠化区不同植被修复模式下土壤螨类群落差异
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Differences in soil mite communities under different modes of vegetation restoration in an intense rocky desertification area,Guizhou,China
  • 作者:陈浒 ; 金道超 ; 陈航 ; 王鹏举 ; 周政 ; 林丹丹
  • 英文作者:CHEN Hu;JIN Daochao;CHEN Hang;WANG Pengju;ZHOU Zheng;LIN Dandan;Institute Entomology Guozhou University;The Provincial Special Key Laboratory for Development and Utilization of Insect Resources,Guizhou University;School of Karst Science,Guizhou Normal University/State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Rocky Desertification Control; The State Key Laboratory Incubation Base for Karst Mountain Ecology Environment of Guizhou Province;
  • 关键词:土壤螨类 ; 群落差异 ; 生态修复 ; 强度石漠化
  • 英文关键词:soil mites;;community difference;;ecological restoration;;intense rocky desertification
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:贵州大学昆虫研究所贵州大学昆虫资源开发利用省级特色重点实验室;贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院/国家喀斯特石漠化防治工程技术研究中心贵州省喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地;
  • 出版日期:2018-10-08
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.38
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划课题(2016YFC0502601);; 贵州省科技创新人才团队项目(20144001);; 农业昆虫与害虫防治贵州省研究生卓越人才计划(2013-010);; 国家重点科技支撑计划课题(2011BAC09B01)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201819026
  • 页数:12
  • CN:19
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:262-273
摘要
石漠化治理区不同植被修复模式下的土壤螨类群落差异反映了生态系统的恢复状况,可籍以反映石漠化治理的生态效果。2014年1月、4月、8月和10月,对贵州花江喀斯特峡谷区顶坛小流域强度石漠化区域的"花椒"、"金银花"、"花椒+金银花"3种植被修复生境的土壤螨类进行了调查,共捕获土壤螨类1372头,隶属3目55科89属。采用类群(属)数、个体数量、个体密度、多样性指数(H')、丰富度指数(SR)、均匀性指数(J)、相似性指数(CN)、捕食性螨类成熟度指数(MI)和甲螨MGP类群等参数对土壤螨类群落差异进行了表征。结果显示,花椒林拥有较丰富的螨类属,金银花林拥有较高的的个体数量和个体密度。不同模式下的科、属类群组成呈现差异;属数、个体数量存在一定的季节差异,花椒林的螨类属数、金银花林的螨类个体数量和个体密度呈现一定的表聚性;群落多样性大多存在季节差异;捕食性革螨以r选择型为主,甲螨主要为O型和M型。研究表明,强度石漠化在不同植被修复模式下,土壤螨类生物生态类群存在差异,土壤生态系统仍处于修复之中,其中螨类优势属、具有典型生物学与生态学特性差异的螨类类群对石漠化治理的生态效果具有重要的指示作用。
        Differences in soil mite communities among different vegetation restoration modes under rocky desertification control reflect the ecosystem restoration status and ecological effects of different rocky desertification control strategies.During January,April,August,and October 2014,a total of 1372 soil mites belonging to 3 orders,55 families,and 89 genera were captured from three kinds of vegetation restoration habitats,Chinese prickly ash( Zanthoxylum planispinum var.dingtanensis), honeysuckle( Lonicera japonica), and Chinese prickly ash + honeysuckle, in an intense rocky desertification area in the Dingtan small watershed in Huajiang Karst canyon,Guizhou Province. The number of genera,number of individuals,individual density,diversity index,richness index,evenness index,similarity index,maturity index,and oribatid mite community structure analysis were used to characterize the differences among soil mite communities. The results showed that the mite genera of Chinese prickly ash forest were rich,the individual mite numberand density in the honeysuckle forest were high,and the composition of families and genera were different among the three restoration modes. The genera numbers and individual numbers were different at each sampling time; in particular,the number of mite genera in Chinese prickly ash forests and the individual mite number and density in honeysuckle forests showed surface-aggregations. The community diversity showed seasonal differences. Predatory mites( Gamasina) were rselected,whereas oribatid mites were mainly O and M-type. In conclusion,the bio-ecological groups of soil mites were different among different modes of vegetation restoration,and the soil ecosystem of the investigated area was still in the restoration process. Meanwhile, the dominant genera of soil mites and groups of typical biological and ecological characteristics could indicate the effect of ecological restoration in rocky desertification control.
引文
[1]熊康宁,李晋,龙明忠.典型喀斯特石漠化治理区水土流失特征与关键问题.地理学报,2012,67(7):878-888.
    [2]屠玉麟,韦昌盛,左祖伦,鲁永明.花椒属一新变种——顶坛花椒及其品种的分类研究.贵州科学,2001,19(1):77-80.
    [3]王德炉,喻理飞,熊康宁.喀斯特石漠化综合治理效果的初步评价——以花江为例.山地农业生物学报,2005,24(3):233-238.
    [4]邓坤丰,刘肇军,肖时珍,李翔翔,符树琴,吴胜利.石漠化防治区综合治理效益指标体系的构建及评价研究——以贵州关岭-贞丰花江示范区为例.中国农学通报,2012,28(17):187-194.
    [5]熊康宁,陈永毕,陈浒,兰安军,隋喆.点石成金——贵州石漠化治理技术与模式.贵阳:贵州科技出版社,2011:57-172.
    [6]杨龙,熊康宁,肖时珍,蓝家程,敖向红.花椒林在喀斯特石漠化治理中的碳汇效益.水土保持通报,2016,36(1):292-297.
    [7]樊云龙,陈浒,熊康宁,苏孝良,韩会庆.花椒林地土壤动物多样性及其对凋落物分解的作用——以贵州花江峡谷为例.地球与环境,2010,38(3):314-319.
    [8]王仙攀,陈浒,熊康宁,李晋,赵基,徐玲,罗井升.喀斯特石漠化地区土壤动物功能类群及培育研究.干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(12):191-195.
    [9]Camann M A,Gillette N E,Lamoncha K L,Mori S R. Response of forest soil Acari to prescribed fire following stand structure manipulation in the southern Cascade Range. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2008,38(5):956-968.
    [10]Jung C,Kim J W,Marquardt T,Kaczmarek S. Species richness of soil gamasid mites(Acari:Mesostigmata)in fire-damaged mountain sites.Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology,2010,13(3):233-237.
    [11]Lindo Z,Visser S. Forest floor microarthropod abundance and oribatid mite(Acari:Oribatida)composition following partial and clear-cut harvesting in the mixedwood boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2004,34(5):998-1006.
    [12]Eeva T,Penttinen R. Leg deformities of oribatid mites as an indicator of environmental pollution. Science of the Total Environment,2009,407(16):4771-4776.
    [13]吴东辉,张柏,卜照义,陈鹏.长春市不同土地利用生境土壤螨类群落结构特征.生态学报,2006,26(1):16-25.
    [14]Ryabinin N A,Pan'kov A N. Successions of oribatid mites(Acariformes:Oribatida)on disturbed areas. Biology Bulletin,2009,36(5):510-515.
    [15]Minor M A,Norton R A. Effects of weed and erosion control on communities of soil mites(Oribatida and Gamasina)in short-rotation willow plantings in central New York. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2008,38(5):1061-1070.
    [16]丁程成,戴征凯,薛晓峰,李辉信,刘满强,陈小云,周静,张斌,胡锋.退化红壤植被恢复对土壤螨类群落结构的影响.生态学报,2008,28(10):4771-4781.
    [17]吴东辉,尹文英,杨振明.松嫩草原中度退化草地不同植被恢复方式下土壤螨类群落特征的差异.动物学报,2007,53(4):607-615.
    [18]吴东辉,尹文英,阎日青.东北松嫩草原重度退化草地两种典型植被恢复处理方式间土壤螨类群落特征比较.动物学研究,2007,28(5):519-525.
    [19]Krantz G W,Walter D E. A manual of Acarology. 3rd ed. Texas:Texas Tech University Press,2009:1-807.
    [20]李隆术,李云瑞.蜱螨学.重庆:重庆出版社,1988:1-520.
    [21]尹文英,胡圣豪,沈韫芬,宁应之,孙希达,吴纪华,诸葛燕,张云美,王敏,陈建英,徐成钢,梁彦龄,王洪铸,杨潼,陈德牛,张国庆,宋大祥,陈军,梁来荣,胡成业,王慧芙,张崇州,匡溥人,陈国孝,赵立军,谢荣栋,张骏,刘宪伟,韩美贞,毕道英,肖宁年,杨大荣.中国土壤动物检索图鉴.北京:科学出版社,1998:163-242,527-562.
    [22]殷绥公,贝纳新,陈万鹏.中国东北土壤革螨.北京:中国农业出版社,2013:1-360.
    [23]李朝品,沈兆鹏.中国粉螨概论.北京:科学出版社,2016:1-568.
    [24]郑祥,鲍毅新,孔军苗,葛宝明.金华北山阔叶林大型土壤动物群落的初步研究.土壤,2005,37(5):545-550.
    [25]Yeates G W,Bongers T. Nematode diversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,1999,74(1/3):113-135.
    [26]Magurra A E. Ecological diversity and its measurements. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press,1988.
    [27]Ruf A. A maturity index for predatory soil mites(Mesostigmata:Gamasina)as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils.Applied Soil Ecology,1998,9(1/3):447-452.
    [28]Aoki J I. Analysis of oribatid communities by relative abundance in the species and individual numbers of the three major groups(MGP-analysis).Bulletin,Institute of Environmental Science and Technology,Yokohama National University,1983,10(1):171-176.
    [29]谢桂林,傅荣恕,刘建丽,王昌儒,郑继军.菏泽牡丹园土壤甲螨群落特点研究.生态学报,2004,24(4):693-699.
    [30]Karg W. To the knowledge of the superfamily Phytoseioidea Karg,1965. Zoologische Jahrbücher,Abteilung für Systematik,1976,103:505-546.
    [31]阿加尔·恰肯,吾玛尔·阿布力孜,排孜力耶·合力力.新疆玛纳斯河流域土壤螨类群落多样性.生态学报,2017,37(24):8385-8396.
    [32]Zhang Y,Jin D C,Zhou Y F,Yang G P,Liang W Q. Community composition and diversity of soil oribatid mites(Acari:Oribatida)in karst forests in Shibing,Guizhou,Southwestern China. Acta Entomologica Sinica,2015,58(7):791-799.
    [33]Bedano J C,CantúM P,Doucet M E. Influence of three different land management practices on soil mite(Arachnida:Acari)densities in relation to a natural soil. Applied Soil Ecology,2006,32(3):293-304.
    [34]战丽莉,许艳丽,张兴义,裴希超,赵刚,王建华.耕作方式对土壤螨类群落结构的影响.中国生态农业学报,2013,21(5):598-605.
    [35]高梅香,刘冬,张雪萍,吴东辉.三江平原农田地表和地下土壤螨类丰富度与环境因子的空间关联性.生态学报,2016,36(6):1782-1792.
    [36]Nielsen U N,Osler G H R,Campbell C D,Burslem D F R P,van der Wal R. The influence of vegetation type,soil properties and precipitation on the composition of soil mite and microbial communities at the landscape scale. Journal of Biogeography,2010,37(7):1317-1328.
    [37]Hasegawa M,Okabe K,Fukuyama K,Makino S,Okochi I,Tanaka H,Goto H,Mizoguchi T,Sakata T. Community structures of Mesostigmata,Prostigmata and Oribatida in broad-leaved regeneration forests and conifer plantations of various ages. Experimental and Applied Acarology,2013,59(4):391-408.
    [38]尹文英,杨逢春,王振中,罗志义,沈韫芬,胡圣豪,王孝祖,赵立军,孙希达,伍惠生,张友梅,谢荣栋,陈德牛,梁彦龄,杨潼,宋大祥,张崇洲,张福祥,杨毅明,刘江,宋碧玉,顾曼如,伍焯田,谢志才,梁来荣,董惠琴,胡成业,戴爱云,李枢强,王大庆,范树德,薛鲁征,张骏,刘宪伟,毕道英,郑乐怡,唐觉,李参.中国亚热带土壤动物.北京:科学出版社,1992:30-39.
    [39]Badieritakis E G,Fantinou A A,Emmanouel N G. A qualitative and quantitative study of mites in similar alfalfa fields in Greece. Experimental and Applied Acarology,2014,62(2):195-214.
    [40]邓国藩,王慧芙,忻介六,王敦清,吴伟南,王孝祖.中国蜱螨概要.北京:科学出版社,1989:25-27.
    [41]Athias-Binche F.cologie des uropodidesédaphiques(Arachnides:Parasitiformes)de troisécosystèmes forestiers. 1. Introduction,matérial,biologie. Vie Milieu,1981,31:137-147.
    [42]Karg W. Vorkommen und ernhrung der milbencohors Uropodina(Scgildkr9tenmilben)sowie ihre eignung als indikatoren in agro9kosystemen.Pedobiologia,1986,29:285-295.
    [43]Paschoal A D. Recharacterization of Gymnodamaeoidea and erection of Plateremaeoidea(Acari,Oribatei),with key to families and genera. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia,1989,6(2):191-200.
    [44]Labandeira C C,Phillips T L,Norton R A. Oribatid mites and the decomposition of plant tissues in Paleozoic coalswamp forests. Palaios,1997,12(4):319-353.
    [45]Ermilov S G,Winchester N N,Lowman M M,Wassie A. Two new species of oribatid mites(Acari:Oribatida)from Ethiopia,including a key to species of Pilobatella. Systematic and Applied Acarology,2012,17(3):301-317.
    [46]木卡热木·阿吉木,吾玛尔·阿布力孜,阿布都如苏力·吐逊,吴松林.准噶尔盆地东南缘绿洲——荒漠交错带土壤甲螨群落结构.干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(8):164-170.
    [47]王克林,苏以荣,曾馥平,陈洪松,肖润林.西南喀斯特典型生态系统土壤特征与植被适应性恢复研究.农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):641-645.
    [48]周运超,王世杰,卢红梅.喀斯特石漠化过程中土壤的空间分布.地球与环境,2010,38(1):1-7.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700