生态系统文化服务研究进展——基于Web of Science分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 作者:戴培超 ; 张绍良 ; 刘润 ; 杨永均
  • 关键词:生态系统 ; 文化服务 ; 研究述评 ; 研究热点
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-21 16:40
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金(51474214)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201905036
  • 页数:13
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:383-395
摘要
随着社会经济的发展,人类对精神层面产品的需求越来越多。生态系统具有文化服务功能,因此近年来学者对文化服务的研究和关注越来越多,发表的文献数量也在持续增加。通过收集与生态系统文化服务相关的文献资料,运用统计分析方法,试图理清国际生态系统文化服务研究脉络。利用Web of Science核心合集数据库,共析出样本文献1530篇,分别对文化服务的研究趋势、时段特征、作者分布、机构分布和文献期刊分布等进行分析。研究发现,生态系统文化服务研究逐渐从以生态学为主,演变为融合生态学、地理学、管理学、社会学等众多学科的综合研究。未来文化服务的研究将集中在文化服务价值的货币化评估、文化服务管理与应用、文化服务指标体系构建、文化服务价值制图、游憩功能和美学功能6大方向。
        
引文
[1] Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H. Extinction: the Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: Random House, 1981.
    [2] Daily G. Nature′s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
    [3] Costanza R, d′Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O′Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(1): 253- 260.
    [4] World Resources Institute. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. 2nd ed. Washington DC: Island Press, 2003.
    [5] Jiang W. Ecosystem services research in China: a critical review. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 26: 10- 16.
    [6] Milcu A I, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(3): 44.
    [7] Englund O, Berndes G, Cederberg C. How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—a systematic review. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 73: 492- 504.
    [8] Nesbitt L, Hotte N, Barron S, Cowan J, Sheppard S R J. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: a review and suggestions for future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2017, 25: 103- 111.
    [9] Liquete C, Piroddi C, Drakou E G, Gurney L, Katsanevakis S, Charef A, Egoh B. Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. PLoS One, 2013, 8(7): e67737.
    [10] La Rosa D, Spyra M, Inostroza L. Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: a review. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 74- 89.
    [11] Hernández-Morcillo M, Plieninger T, Bieling C. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 29: 434- 444.
    [12] van Berkel D B, Verburg P H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 37: 163- 174.
    [13] Czembrowski P, Kronenberg J, Czepkiewicz M. Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods - SoftGIS and hedonic pricing. Ecological Economics, 2016, 130: 166- 175.
    [14] Ala-Hulkko T, Kotavaara O, Alahuhta J, Helle P, Hjort J. Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 66: 416- 427.
    [15] Yoshimura N, Hiura T. Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosystem Services, 2017, 24: 68- 78.
    [16] Everard M, Kataria G. Recreational angling markets to advance the conservation of a reach of the Western Ramganga River, India. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2011, 21(1): 101- 108.
    [17] de Souza Filho J R, Santos R C, Silva I R, Elliff C I. Evaluation of recreational quality, carrying capacity and ecosystem services supplied by sandy beaches of the municipality of Cama?ari, northern coast of Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Coastal Research, 2014, 70: 527- 532.
    [18] Tenerelli P, Püffel C, Luque S. Spatial assessment of aesthetic services in a complex mountain region: combining visual landscape properties with crowdsourced geographic information. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32(5): 1097- 1115.
    [19] Cooper N, Brady E, Steen H, Bryce R. Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ′services′. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 218- 229.
    [20] Darvill R, Lindo Z. The inclusion of stakeholders and cultural ecosystem services in land management trade-off decisions using an ecosystem services approach. Landscape Ecology, 2016, 31(3): 533- 545.
    [21] Ghaley B B, Vesterdal L, Porter J R. Quantification and valuation of ecosystem services in diverse production systems for informed decision-making. Environmental Science & Policy, 2014, 39: 139- 149.
    [22] Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Levitt E A. Looking to the future of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 2005, 8(2): 125- 132.
    [23] Chiesura A, de Groot R. Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 2003, 44(2/3): 219- 231.
    [24] Harrison P A, Vandewalle M, Sykes M T, Berry P M, Bugter R, de Bello F, Feld C K, Grandin U, Harrington R, Haslett J R, Jongman R H G, Luck G W, Da Silva P M, Moora M, Settele J, Sousa J P, Zobel M. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19(10): 2791- 2821.
    [25] Schnegg M, Rieprich R, Pr?pper M. Culture, nature, and the valuation of ecosystem services in northern Namibia. Ecology and Society, 2014, 19(4): 26.
    [26] Paracchini M L, Zulian G, Kopperoinen L, Maes J, Sch?gner J P, Termansen M, Zandersen M, Perez-Soba M, Scholefield P A, Bidoglio G. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 45: 371- 385.
    [27] Hicks C C, Graham N A J, Cinner J E. Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(6): 1444- 1453.
    [28] Ruhl J B. Adaptive management of ecosystem services across different land use regimes. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 183: 418- 423.
    [29] de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393- 408.
    [30] Jim C Y, Chen W Y. Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(1/2): 81- 96.
    [31] Boyle K J, Parmeter C F, Boehlert B B, Paterson R W. Due diligence in meta-analyses to support benefit transfers. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2013, 55(3): 357- 386.
    [32] Zandersen M, Tol R S J. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. Journal of Forest Economics, 2009, 15(1/2): 109- 130.
    [33] Ghermandi A. Benefits of coastal recreation in Europe: Identifying trade-offs and priority regions for sustainable management. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 152: 218- 229.
    [34] Jobstvogt N, Watson V, Kenter J O. Looking below the surface: the cultural ecosystem service values of UK marine protected areas (MPAs). Ecosystem Services, 2014, 10: 97- 110.
    [35] Oleson K L L, Barnes M, Brander L M, Oliver T A, van Beek I, Zafindrasilivonona B, van Beukering P. Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: a discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecological Economics, 2015, 114: 104- 116.
    [36] Raymond C M, Bryan B A, MacDonald D H, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(5): 1301- 1315.
    [37] Boersma P D, Parrish J K. Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution. Ecological Economics, 1999, 31(2): 287- 304.
    [38] You W B, Ji Z R, Wu L Y, Deng X P, Huang D H, Chen B R, Yu J A, He D J. Modeling changes in land use patterns and ecosystem services to explore a potential solution for meeting the management needs of a heritage site at the landscape level. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 73: 68- 78.
    [39] Kennedy J J, Thomas J W, Glueck P. Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century. Forest Policy and Economics, 2001, 3(1/2): 81- 95.
    [40] Elmqvist T, Colding J, Barthel S, Borgstr?m S, Duit A, Lundberg J, Andersson E, AhrnéK, Ernstson H, Folke C, Bengtsson J. The dynamics of social-ecological systems in urban landscapes: Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2004, 1023: 308- 322.
    [41] Hamilton S K, Gehrke P C. Australia′s tropical river systems: current scientific understanding and critical knowledge gaps for sustainable management. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2005, 56(3): 243- 252.
    [42] S?derqvist T, Eggert H, Olsson B, Soutukorva ?. Economic valuation for sustainable development in the Swedish coastal zone. Ambio, 2005, 34(2): 169- 175.
    [43] Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Corlianò M E, Zaccarelli N, Dadamo M. Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79(1): 29- 37.
    [44] Zander K K, Garnett S T, Straton A. Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation - willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(12): 2519- 2528.
    [45] Malinga R, Gordon L J, Lindborg R, Jewitt G. Using participatory scenario planning to identify ecosystem services in changing landscapes. Ecology and Society, 2013, 18(4): 10.
    [46] Bredin Y K, Lindhjem H, van Dijk J, Linnell J D C. Mapping value plurality towards ecosystem services in the case of Norwegian wildlife management: A Q analysis. Ecological Economics, 2015, 118: 198- 206.
    [47] Rall E, Bieling C, Zytynska S, Haase D. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 77: 80- 95.
    [48] Brown G, Montag J M, Lyon K. Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society & Natural Resources, 2012, 25(7): 633- 651.
    [49] Plieninger T, Dijks S, Oteros-Rozas E, Bieling C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33: 118- 129.
    [50] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
    [51] Boyd J, Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(2/3): 616- 626.
    [52] Wallace K J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 2007, 139(3/4): 235- 246.
    [53] Burkhard B, Gee K. Establishing the resilience of a coastal-marine social-ecological system to the installation of offshore wind farms. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(4): 32.
    [54] Haines-Young R, Potschin M. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003. Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham, 2013. https://cices.eu/.
    [55] Sagie H, Morris A, Rofè Y, Orenstein D E, Groner E. Cross-cultural perceptions of ecosystem services: a social inquiry on both sides of the Israeli-Jordanian border of the Southern Arava Valley Desert. Journal of Arid Environments, 2013, 97: 38- 48.
    [56] Fletcher R, Baulcomb C, Hall C, Hussain S. Revealing marine cultural ecosystem services in the Black Sea. Marine Policy, 2014, 50: 151- 161.
    [57] Yap H T. The case for restoration of tropical coastal ecosystems. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2000, 43(8/9): 841- 851.
    [58] Fagerholm N, K?yhk? N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M. Community stakeholders′ knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 18: 421- 433.
    [59] Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Laterra P, Barrena J, Aguayo M. A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: the case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 40: 90- 101.
    [60] Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Bennett E M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(11): 5242- 5247.
    [61] Kearney A R, Bradley G. Human dimensions of forest management: an empirical study of stakeholder perspectives. Urban Ecosystems, 1998, 2(1): 5- 16.
    [62] Rolf W, Lenz R, Peters D. Development of a quantitative ‘bioassay’ approach for ecosystem mapping. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2012, 8(1/2): 71- 79.
    [63] Brown G, Fagerholm N. Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 13: 119- 133.
    [64] Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J, Clement J M. An application of social values for ecosystem services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36: 68- 79.
    [65] Klain S C, Chan K M A. Navigating coastal values: participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning. Ecological Economics, 2012, 82: 104- 113.
    [66] Peňa L, Casado-Arzuaga I, Onaindia M. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosystem Services, 2015, 13: 108- 118.
    [67] Fish R, Church A, Willis C, Winter M, Tratalos J A, Haines-Young R, Potschin M. Making space for cultural ecosystem services: insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative. Ecosystem Services, 2016, 21: 329- 343.
    [68] Canedoli C, Bullock C, Collier M J, Joyce D, Padoa-Schioppa E. Public participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services: citizen perception and park management in the Parco Nord of Milan (Italy). Sustainability, 2017, 9(6): 891.
    [69] Costanza R. The ecological, economic, and social importance of the oceans. Ecological Economics, 1999, 31(2): 199- 213.
    [70] Hermy M, Van Der Veken S, Van Calster H, Plue J. Forest ecosystem assessment, changes in biodiversity and climate change in a densely populated region (Flanders, Belgium). Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 2008, 142(3): 623- 629.
    [71] Tzoulas K, James P. Peoples′ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: a case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2010, 9(2): 121- 128.
    [72] Chen W Y, Jim C Y. Resident motivations and Willingness-to-Pay for urban biodiversity conservation in Guangzhou (China). Environmental Management, 2010, 45(5): 1052- 1064.
    [73] Laband D N. The neglected stepchildren of forest-based ecosystem services: cultural, spiritual, and aesthetic values. Forest Policy and Economics, 2013, 35: 39- 44.
    [74] Mekala G D, Jones R N, MacDonald D H. Valuing the benefits of creek rehabilitation: building a business case for public investments in urban green infrastructure. Environmental Management, 2015, 55(6): 1354- 1365.
    [75] Ribeiro F P, Ribeiro K T. Participative mapping of cultural ecosystem services in Pedra Branca State Park, Brazil. Natureza & Conserva??o, 2016, 14(2): 120- 127.
    [76] Blake D, Augé A A, Sherren K. Participatory mapping to elicit cultural coastal values for Marine Spatial Planning in a remote archipelago. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017, 148: 195- 203.
    [77] Li F, Wang R S, Liu X S, Zhang X L. Urban forest in China: development patterns, influencing factors and research prospects. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2005, 12(2): 197- 204.
    [78] Groenfeldt D. Multifunctionality of agricultural water: looking beyond food production and ecosystem services. Irrigation and Drainage, 2006, 55(1): 73- 83.
    [79] Anthony A, Atwood J, August P, Byron C, Cobb S, Foster C, Fry C, Gold A, Hagos K, Heffner L, Kellogg D Q, Lellis-Dibble K, Opaluch J J, Oviatt C, Pfeiffer-Herbert A, Rohr N, Smith L, Smythe T, Swift J, Vinhateiro N. Coastal lagoons and climate change: ecological and social ramifications in U.S. Atlantic and gulf coast ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 2009, 14(1): 8.
    [80] Quétier F, Rivoal F, Marty P, de Chazal J, Thuiller W, Lavorel S. Social representations of an alpine grassland landscape and socio-political discourses on rural development. Regional Environmental Change, 2010, 10(2): 119- 130.
    [81] Grala R K, Tyndall J C, Mize C W. Willingness to pay for aesthetics associated with field windbreaks in Iowa, United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 108(2/4): 71- 78.
    [82] Casado-Arzuaga I, Madariaga I, Onaindia M. Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 129: 33- 43.
    [83] Tribot A S, Mouquet N, Villéger S, Raymond M, Hoff F, Boissery P, Holon F, Deter J. Taxonomic and functional diversity increase the aesthetic value of coralligenous reefs. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 34229.
    [84] De Lacy P, Shackleton C. Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites. Sustainability, 2017, 9(9): 1628.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700