广义摄动度及BKS推理方法的鲁棒性
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Generalized perturbation degree and robustness of BKS reasoning method
  • 作者:王媛媛 ; 裴道武
  • 英文作者:WANG Yuanyuan;PEI Daowu;School of Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University;
  • 关键词:模糊逻辑 ; 模糊推理 ; 摄动 ; 广义摄动 ; BKS推理方法 ; 鲁棒性
  • 英文关键词:fuzzy logic;;fuzzy reasoning;;perturbation degree;;generalized perturbation degree;;BKS reasoning method;;robustness
  • 中文刊名:ZJSG
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University(Natural Sciences Edition)
  • 机构:浙江理工大学理学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-11-16 16:45
  • 出版单位:浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(11171308,61379018,61472471)
  • 语种:英文;
  • 页:ZJSG201902025
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:33-1338/TS
  • 分类号:119-125
摘要
针对用于研究模糊推理鲁棒性的模糊集摄动程度概念不统一的状况,提出了广义摄动度的概念,使文献中出现的多个概念成为新概念的特殊情形。基于提出的广义摄动度概念,系统研究了一些常用蕴涵和模糊连接词的摄动程度,给出了常用蕴涵和模糊连接词的广义摄动度,并且得到基于五个模糊蕴涵的Bandler-Kohout Subproduct(BKS)推理方法的鲁棒性结果。
        Aiming at the situation that the concept of fuzzy set perturbation degree used to study the robustness of fuzzy reasoning is not uniform, the concept of generalized perturbation is proposed, which makes the multiple concepts appearing in the literature become special cases of the new concept. Based on the proposed concept of generalized perturbation degree, the perturbation degree of some commonly used implications and fuzzy connection words are systematically studied. The generalized perturbation of common implications and fuzzy connection words are given, and the robustness of the Bandler-Kohout Subproduct(BKS) reasoning method based on five fuzzy implications is obtained.
引文
[1] Pappis C P. Value approximation of fuzzy systems variables[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1991, 39(1): 111-115.
    [2] Ying M S. Perturbation of fuzzy reasoning [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 1999, 7(5): 625-629.
    [3] Hong D H, Hwang S Y. A note on the value similarity of fuzzy systems variables[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994, 66(3): 383-386.
    [4] Dai S S, Pei D W, Wang S M. Perturbation of fuzzy sets and fuzzy reasoning based on normalized Minkowski distances[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2011, 189(1): 63-73.
    [5] Montes S, Couso I, Gil P, et al. Divergence measures between fuzzy sets[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2002, 30(2): 91-105.
    [6] Wang G J, Duan J Y. On robustness of the full implication triple I inference method with respect to finer measurements[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2014, 55(3): 787-796.
    [7] 王国俊,段景瑶.适宜于展开模糊推理的两类模糊度量空间[J].中国科学:信息科学,2014,44(5):623-632.
    [8] Li Y F, Qin K Y, He X, et al. Robustness of fuzzy connectives and fuzzy reasoning with respect to general divergence measures[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2016, 294: 63-78.
    [9] 裴道武.基于三角模的模糊逻辑理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2013:7-15.
    [10] Cai K Y. qualities of fuzzy sets [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1995, 76(1): 97-112.
    [11] Duan J Y, Li Y M. Robustness analysis of logic metrics on F(X) F(X) math container loading mathjax [J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2015, 61: 33-42.
    [12] Zadeh L A. Outline of new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1973, 3(1): 28-44.
    [13] Pedrycz W. Applications of fuzzy relational equations for methods of reasoning in presence of fuzzy data[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 16(2): 163-175.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700