人工降雨和放水冲刷试验下红壤坡面径流与泥沙特征分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Characteristics of Runoff and Sediment Yield on Red Soil Slope under Artificial Rainfall and Scouring
  • 作者:钟壬琳 ; 张平仓
  • 英文作者:ZHONG Ren-lin;ZHANG Ping-cang;Water Resources Management Center of Zhejiang Province ( Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Center);Soil and Water Conservation Department,Yangtze River Scientific ResearchInstitute;
  • 关键词:红壤 ; 人工降雨 ; 放水冲刷 ; 径流量 ; 泥沙量
  • 英文关键词:red soil;;artificial rainfall;;scouring;;runoff volume;;sediment load
  • 中文刊名:CJKB
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute
  • 机构:浙江省水资源管理中心(浙江省水土保持监测中心);长江科学院水土保持研究所;
  • 出版日期:2018-02-06 10:17
  • 出版单位:长江科学院院报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.244
  • 基金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2007CB407203)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CJKB201902009
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:42-1171/TV
  • 分类号:37-42
摘要
南方红壤丘陵区是我国水土流失最严重的区域之一,严重的水土流失会导致土壤退化,也会影响农业生产的可持续发展,因此,研究红壤坡面侵蚀规律对南方红壤丘陵区水土流失防治意义重大。以红壤坡面为研究对象,应用人工降雨和放水冲刷试验,选择5°,10°,15°,20°四个坡度,设计0.8,1.2,2.1,2.6 mm/min四种降雨强度(相对应的放水流量分别为1.4,3.0,5.7,7.0 L/min),对红壤坡面的径流和泥沙特征进行了研究。结果表明:2种试验条件下,红壤坡面初始产流时间均随着坡度和降雨强度(放水流量)的增大而减小,尤以5°坡和0.80 mm/min降雨强度(1.40 L/min放水流量)下变化幅度最为明显,且在坡度较小时(5°和10°),人工降雨试验产流快; 2种试验条件下红壤坡面径流量稳定时间为15~20 min,人工降雨试验红壤坡面泥沙量稳定时间为10~15 min,放水冲刷试验红壤坡面泥沙量稳定时间为15~20 min;径流和产沙总量随降雨强度(放水流量)和坡度增加而增大,在降雨强度(放水流量)和坡度较小时变化幅度较大;降雨试验的径流总量超过放水试验,产沙总量在降雨强度(放水流量)和坡度较小时,放水试验多,但随着降雨强度(放水流量)和坡度的增加,降雨试验多; 5°坡在不同的降雨强度和放水流量下,径流和泥沙总量变化幅度最大,故应重视5°坡的水土流失预防。研究结果有助于全面了解红壤侵蚀规律,并为南方红壤丘陵区开展土壤侵蚀治理提供数据支撑。
        Hilly red soil region in south China is a region with the most severe water and soil loss in China. Severe soil erosion will lead to soil degradation and will also affect the sustainable development of agricultural production.Studying the erosion law of red soil slope is of great significance for the prevention and control of water loss and soil erosion in hilly red soil region in south China. The features of runoff and sediment yield on red soil slope were studied in this research through artificial rainfall and scouring test. Slope gradient was designed as 5°,10°,15°,and20°,and rainfall intensity at four levels,namely,0.8 mm/min,1.2 mm/min,2.1 mm/min,and 2.6 mm/min,and the corresponding scouring discharge 1.4 L/min,3.0 L/min,5.7 L/min,and 7.0 L/min,respectively. Research results are concluded as follows: 1) Under both artificial rainfall and scouring conditions,the initial runoff yield duration of red soil slope declined with the increase of slope gradient and scouring discharge,and such decline was the most remarkable on slope of 5° gradient in the presence of 0.8 mm/min rainfall intensity( 1.4 L/min scouring flow rate). On slope of small gradient( 5° and 10°),initial runoff yield in artificial rainfall test came earlierthan in scouring test. 2) Under both test conditions,runoff stabilized within 15-20 min; sediment load stabilized in10-15 min under artificial rainfall and 15-20 min under scouring. 3) The total volume of runoff and sediment yield on red soil slope increased with the rise of rainfall intensity and scouring discharge,and such increase was particularly apparent on slopes of small gradient in the presence of small rainfall intensity and scouring discharge. The total volume of runoff in artificial rainfall test was larger than that in scouring test; on the contrary,the total sediment yield in artificial rainfall test was smaller than that in scouring test under small rainfall intensity and scouring discharge,but became larger with the rise of rainfall intensity. 4) In addition,attentions should be paid to the prevention of soil and water loss on slopes of 5° gradient as the total runoff and sediment yield on 5° slope gradient changed more dramatically than on other gradients despite rainfall intensity and scouring discharge. The research results are conducive to understanding red soil erosion and offer data support for the treatment of red soil erosion in south China.
引文
[1]陈文亮,王占礼.国内外人工模拟降雨装置综述[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(1):61-65.
    [2]任树梅,刘洪禄,顾涛.人工模拟降雨技术研究综述[J].中国农村水利水电,2003,(3):73-75.
    [3]王洁,胡少伟,周跃.人工模拟降雨装置在水土保持方面的应用[J].水土保持研究,2005,12(4):188-190,194.
    [4]MUTCHLER C K,HERMSMEIER L I.A Review of Rainfall Simulators[J].Transactions of the America Society of Agricultural Engineers,1965,8(1):67-68.
    [5]MOLDENHAUER W C.Rainfall Simulation as a Research Tool[C]∥Proceedings of the Rainfall Simulator Workshop.U.S.Department of Agriculture Science and Education Administration.Tucson,Arizona,March 7-9,1979:90-95.
    [6]付兴涛,张丽萍.坡长对红壤侵蚀影响人工降雨模拟研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(3):474-483.
    [7]洪斌,张祖莲,黄英,等.人工降雨条件下云南红土坡面土壤侵蚀特性[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(4):118-123.
    [8]马美景,王军光,郭忠录,等.放水冲刷对红壤坡面侵蚀过程及溶质迁移特征的影响[J].土壤学报,2016,53(2):365-374.
    [9]彭旭东,江东,史东梅,等.紫色丘陵区不同弃土弃渣下垫面产流产沙试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):9-13.
    [10]王爱娟,丁文峰,王万君.人工降雨和放水冲刷条件下紫色土坡面产流产沙特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(3):31-34.
    [11]尹武君.黄土坡面土壤侵蚀能量描述[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2012:1-54.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700