政府与市场关系的三元视角
|
摘要
政府与市场的关系一直以来都是重要的讨论话题,但主要是从二元视角来进行探讨的。在讨论了市场是信息传递的媒介和市场活动的场所的本质之后,尝试着引入企业这一市场行动主体到政府与市场二元关系的讨论中,将其拓展为政府、市场、企业三元关系的讨论,最后指出讨论政府、市场、企业三元关系的现实意义在于为市场问题的解决提供多元视角,并认为通过给予非政府主体更多的自主权可以减少信息不对称,从而达到发挥政府和市场优势的目的。
The relationship between government and market has been an important topic of discussion, but the argument from before is focused on the dual perspectives. After discussion of the nature of the market, which are the medium of the spread of market information and the place for market activities, we try to make the enterprise, a kind of market subject, into the discussion of the relationship between government and market, so that make it changed into the argument about the relationship of three subjects of government,market and enterprise, in the last, it points out that the practical significance of the ternary relationship between government, market and enterprise is to provide multiple perspectives for the solution of market problems, and believes that by giving non-governmental subjects more rights, information asymmetry can be reduced, so as to give full play to the advantages of government and market.
The relationship between government and market has been an important topic of discussion, but the argument from before is focused on the dual perspectives. After discussion of the nature of the market, which are the medium of the spread of market information and the place for market activities, we try to make the enterprise, a kind of market subject, into the discussion of the relationship between government and market, so that make it changed into the argument about the relationship of three subjects of government,market and enterprise, in the last, it points out that the practical significance of the ternary relationship between government, market and enterprise is to provide multiple perspectives for the solution of market problems, and believes that by giving non-governmental subjects more rights, information asymmetry can be reduced, so as to give full play to the advantages of government and market.
引文
[1]山田重克.市场经济:历史、思想、现在[M].张秀风,等,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
[2]杨春学,谢志刚,王瑶.对自有市场的两种理解——芝加哥学派与奥地利学派的比较[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[3]伊斯雷尔·柯兹纳.市场过程的含义[M].冯兴元,檀学文,朱海就,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:112.
[4]路德维希·拉赫曼.资本及其结构[M].刘纽泽,译,熊越,蒲定东,校.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2015:9.
[5]理查德·R.纳尔逊,悉尼·G.温特.经济变迁的演化理论[M].胡世凯,译,北京:商务印书馆,1997:293.
[6]杰弗里·M.霍奇逊.演化与制度——论演化经济学和经济学的演化[M].任荣华,等,译,张林,孟婕,校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:35.
[7]刘祖云.政府与市场的关系:双重博弈与伙伴相依[J].江海学刊,2006,(2):106-112.
[8]张永丽,柳建平.论和谐社会——一个政府与市场关系的理论框架[J].经济体制改革,2007,(1):113-117.
[9]胡钧.政府与市场关系论[J].当代经济研究,2013,(8):22-30.
[10]白永秀,王颂吉.我国经济体制改革核心重构——政府与市场关系[J].改革,2014,(7):14-21.
[11]张群群.超越二元论:对政府与市场关系的反思[J].当代经济科学,2000,(6):8-12.
[12]高宏伟,王金桃.新型城镇化发展的三维逻辑:政府、市场、社会[J].经济问题,2018,(3):100-105.
[13]杨春学.政府与市场关系的中国视野[J].经济纵横,2018,(2):19-21.
(1)我国古代集市大都有时间限制,一般是在白天的某一时段,这和市场规模有关系,因此夜市的出现从另一个角度说明了当时生产力水平比较高,人们的剩余产品比较丰富。
(2)坊市制度的出现打破了市场经营时间的限制,也打破了政府的对市场监管的传统。
(3)此处市场问题主要是指市场无法有效配置资源。
[2]杨春学,谢志刚,王瑶.对自有市场的两种理解——芝加哥学派与奥地利学派的比较[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2013.
[3]伊斯雷尔·柯兹纳.市场过程的含义[M].冯兴元,檀学文,朱海就,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2012:112.
[4]路德维希·拉赫曼.资本及其结构[M].刘纽泽,译,熊越,蒲定东,校.上海:上海财经大学出版社,2015:9.
[5]理查德·R.纳尔逊,悉尼·G.温特.经济变迁的演化理论[M].胡世凯,译,北京:商务印书馆,1997:293.
[6]杰弗里·M.霍奇逊.演化与制度——论演化经济学和经济学的演化[M].任荣华,等,译,张林,孟婕,校.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:35.
[7]刘祖云.政府与市场的关系:双重博弈与伙伴相依[J].江海学刊,2006,(2):106-112.
[8]张永丽,柳建平.论和谐社会——一个政府与市场关系的理论框架[J].经济体制改革,2007,(1):113-117.
[9]胡钧.政府与市场关系论[J].当代经济研究,2013,(8):22-30.
[10]白永秀,王颂吉.我国经济体制改革核心重构——政府与市场关系[J].改革,2014,(7):14-21.
[11]张群群.超越二元论:对政府与市场关系的反思[J].当代经济科学,2000,(6):8-12.
[12]高宏伟,王金桃.新型城镇化发展的三维逻辑:政府、市场、社会[J].经济问题,2018,(3):100-105.
[13]杨春学.政府与市场关系的中国视野[J].经济纵横,2018,(2):19-21.
(1)我国古代集市大都有时间限制,一般是在白天的某一时段,这和市场规模有关系,因此夜市的出现从另一个角度说明了当时生产力水平比较高,人们的剩余产品比较丰富。
(2)坊市制度的出现打破了市场经营时间的限制,也打破了政府的对市场监管的传统。
(3)此处市场问题主要是指市场无法有效配置资源。