既有建筑节能改造市场的政府治理研究综述
|
摘要
既有建筑节能改造市场发展是多主体协同驱动的结果,既有建筑节能改造的公共品属性决定了政府作用的关键性。本文基于市场治理视角,从完善法律法规、实施激励政策、构建信息平台、优化融资环境等四个方面概括了国外既有建筑节能改造市场政府治理实践特征;梳理了国外既有建筑节能改造的激励政策、能效标识、EPC模式、风险共担等研究成果。基于市场发展视角,解析了我国既有建筑节能改造市场政府管制实践进程,阐述了我国既有建筑节能改造市场政府监管、融资模式、行为策略、激励机制、运行机理等理论研究动态,论证了基于市场治理视角下既有建筑节能改造市场发展的政府作用力形成与实施机理研究的必要性。
The development of existing building energy-saving renovation market is the result of cooperative driving of many subjects. The public goods properties of the existing building energy-saving determine the key role of the government. Based on the perspective of market governance,this paper summarizes the practice characteristics of government governance in existing buildings energy-saving renovation market of foreign countries from four aspects: perfecting laws and regulations,implementing incentive policies,building information platform and optimizing financing environment; the paper also combs the foreign research results of incentive policies,energy efficiency labeling,EPC mode and risk sharing in existing building energy-saving renovation. Based on the perspective of market development,the process of government regulation in China 's existing building energy-saving renovation market is analyzed,and the theoretical research trends of the government regulation,financing mode,behavior strategy,incentive mechanism and operation mechanism of existing building energy-saving renovation market in china are expounded, the necessity of the research on the formation and implementation mechanism of the government's force in the development of the existing energy-saving building renovation market under the view of market governance is demonstrated.
The development of existing building energy-saving renovation market is the result of cooperative driving of many subjects. The public goods properties of the existing building energy-saving determine the key role of the government. Based on the perspective of market governance,this paper summarizes the practice characteristics of government governance in existing buildings energy-saving renovation market of foreign countries from four aspects: perfecting laws and regulations,implementing incentive policies,building information platform and optimizing financing environment; the paper also combs the foreign research results of incentive policies,energy efficiency labeling,EPC mode and risk sharing in existing building energy-saving renovation. Based on the perspective of market development,the process of government regulation in China 's existing building energy-saving renovation market is analyzed,and the theoretical research trends of the government regulation,financing mode,behavior strategy,incentive mechanism and operation mechanism of existing building energy-saving renovation market in china are expounded, the necessity of the research on the formation and implementation mechanism of the government's force in the development of the existing energy-saving building renovation market under the view of market governance is demonstrated.
引文
[1]曹芳.中国建筑业节能政策措施研究:国际比较及启示[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2012,29(4):14-21.
[2]张琦.国外建筑节能政策比较分析及启示[J].国际经济合作,2012,(5):48-53.
[3]Vringer K,van Middelkoop M,Hoogervorst N.Saving energy is not easy:An impact assessment of Dutch policy to reduce the energy requirements of buildings[J].Energy Policy,2016,93:23-32.
[4]Gram-Hanssen K.Existing buildings-users,renovations and energy policy[J].Renewable Energy,2014,61:136-140.
[5]Roy A M,Seraspe R L,Desai T.Using building size to optimize electric utility energy efficiency incentives[J].Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment,2016,36(1):18-31.
[6]Visscher H,Meijer F,Majcen D,et al.Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing[J].Building Research and Information,2016,44(5-6):552-561.
[7]Muresan A A,Attia S.Energy efficiency in the Romanian residential building stock:A literature review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,74:349-363
[8]Hrsman B,Daghbashyan Z,Chaudhary P.On the quality and impact of residential energy performance certificates[J].Energy and Buildings,2016,113:711-723.
[9]Olaussen J O,Oust A,Solstad J T.Energy performance certificates-informing the informed or the indifferent?[J].Energy Policy,2017,111:246-254.
[10]Principi P,Fiorett R,Carbonari A,et al.Evaluation of energy conservation opportunities through Energy Performance Contracting:A case study in Italy[J].Energy and Buildings,2016,128:886-899.
[11]Polzin F,von Flotow P,Nolden C.What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting?Evidence from German municipalities[J].Energy Policy,2016,94:317-330.
[12]Carbonari A,Fioretti R,Lemma M,et al.Managing energy retrofit of acute hospitals and community clinics through EPC contracting:The MARTE project[J].Energy Procedia,2015,78:1033-1038.
[13]Garbuzova-Schlifter M,Madlener R.AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia[J].Energy Policy,2016,97:559-581.
[14]Khazaeni G,Khanzadi M,Afshar A.Fuzzy adaptive decision making model for selection balanced risk allocation[J].International Journal of Project Management,2012,30:511-522.
[15]Hufen H,de Bruijn H.Getting the incentives right.Energy performance contracts as a tool for property management by local government[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:2717-2729.
[16]住房和城乡建设部科技发展促进中心.中国建筑节能发展报告——既有建筑节能改造[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[17]张严柱.我国公共建筑节能政策设计原则与建议[J].建筑经济,2012,(4):5-7.
[18]符冠云,裴庆冰,郁聪.新常态下提高重点用能企业节能内生动力的机制探索[J].中国能源,2016,38(10):12-16.
[19]李新英.节能减排——基于市场与政府的双重作用[J].生态经济,2010,(1):50-53.
[20]赵盈盈,申玲.既有建筑节能改造进程中群体间的演化博弈分析[J].四川建筑科学研究,2012,38(3):323-326.
[21]丁友卫.合同能源管理融资模式探讨[J].价格月刊,2012,(6):76-79.
[22]商惠敏,李朝庭.美国合同能源管理融资模式及经验探析与启示[J].科技管理研究,2013,(13):48-51.
[23]段小萍.低碳经济情境的合同能源管理与融资偏好[J].改革,2013,(5):120-126.
[24]郭本海,黄良义,刘思峰.基于“政府–企业”间委托代理关系的节能激励机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):160-164.
[25]魏兴,郭汉丁,杨彩霞.既有建筑节能改造激励政策下政府与ESCO的博弈[J].建筑,2015,(8):23-25.
[26]王星,郭汉丁,陶凯,等.既有建筑节能改造市场发展协同激励路径优化研究综述[J].建筑经济,2016,37(7):100-104.
[27]邓建英,兰秋军.建筑节能监管体系中消费者与房地产开发商之间诚信博弈模型[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2014,28(3):66-69.
[28]刘晓君,张晨曦.既有居住建筑节能改造中业主与ESCO进化博弈分析——基于合同能源管理模式(EMC)[J].建筑经济,2015,36(9):100-103.
[29]朱茹琳.基于博弈分析的既有建筑节能改造经济激励政策研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.
[30]侯静,武涌,刘伊生.既有公共建筑节能改造市场化途径研究[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(6):1-5.
[31]郭汉丁,马兴能,尚伶.既有建筑节能改造市场培育实践与理论研究综述[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(18):151-156.
[32]马兴能,郭汉丁,尚伶.国内外既有建筑节能改造市场培育实践研究分析[J].建筑节能,2012,40(2):71-74.
[2]张琦.国外建筑节能政策比较分析及启示[J].国际经济合作,2012,(5):48-53.
[3]Vringer K,van Middelkoop M,Hoogervorst N.Saving energy is not easy:An impact assessment of Dutch policy to reduce the energy requirements of buildings[J].Energy Policy,2016,93:23-32.
[4]Gram-Hanssen K.Existing buildings-users,renovations and energy policy[J].Renewable Energy,2014,61:136-140.
[5]Roy A M,Seraspe R L,Desai T.Using building size to optimize electric utility energy efficiency incentives[J].Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment,2016,36(1):18-31.
[6]Visscher H,Meijer F,Majcen D,et al.Improved governance for energy efficiency in housing[J].Building Research and Information,2016,44(5-6):552-561.
[7]Muresan A A,Attia S.Energy efficiency in the Romanian residential building stock:A literature review[J].Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,74:349-363
[8]Hrsman B,Daghbashyan Z,Chaudhary P.On the quality and impact of residential energy performance certificates[J].Energy and Buildings,2016,113:711-723.
[9]Olaussen J O,Oust A,Solstad J T.Energy performance certificates-informing the informed or the indifferent?[J].Energy Policy,2017,111:246-254.
[10]Principi P,Fiorett R,Carbonari A,et al.Evaluation of energy conservation opportunities through Energy Performance Contracting:A case study in Italy[J].Energy and Buildings,2016,128:886-899.
[11]Polzin F,von Flotow P,Nolden C.What encourages local authorities to engage with energy performance contracting for retrofitting?Evidence from German municipalities[J].Energy Policy,2016,94:317-330.
[12]Carbonari A,Fioretti R,Lemma M,et al.Managing energy retrofit of acute hospitals and community clinics through EPC contracting:The MARTE project[J].Energy Procedia,2015,78:1033-1038.
[13]Garbuzova-Schlifter M,Madlener R.AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia[J].Energy Policy,2016,97:559-581.
[14]Khazaeni G,Khanzadi M,Afshar A.Fuzzy adaptive decision making model for selection balanced risk allocation[J].International Journal of Project Management,2012,30:511-522.
[15]Hufen H,de Bruijn H.Getting the incentives right.Energy performance contracts as a tool for property management by local government[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016,112:2717-2729.
[16]住房和城乡建设部科技发展促进中心.中国建筑节能发展报告——既有建筑节能改造[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[17]张严柱.我国公共建筑节能政策设计原则与建议[J].建筑经济,2012,(4):5-7.
[18]符冠云,裴庆冰,郁聪.新常态下提高重点用能企业节能内生动力的机制探索[J].中国能源,2016,38(10):12-16.
[19]李新英.节能减排——基于市场与政府的双重作用[J].生态经济,2010,(1):50-53.
[20]赵盈盈,申玲.既有建筑节能改造进程中群体间的演化博弈分析[J].四川建筑科学研究,2012,38(3):323-326.
[21]丁友卫.合同能源管理融资模式探讨[J].价格月刊,2012,(6):76-79.
[22]商惠敏,李朝庭.美国合同能源管理融资模式及经验探析与启示[J].科技管理研究,2013,(13):48-51.
[23]段小萍.低碳经济情境的合同能源管理与融资偏好[J].改革,2013,(5):120-126.
[24]郭本海,黄良义,刘思峰.基于“政府–企业”间委托代理关系的节能激励机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):160-164.
[25]魏兴,郭汉丁,杨彩霞.既有建筑节能改造激励政策下政府与ESCO的博弈[J].建筑,2015,(8):23-25.
[26]王星,郭汉丁,陶凯,等.既有建筑节能改造市场发展协同激励路径优化研究综述[J].建筑经济,2016,37(7):100-104.
[27]邓建英,兰秋军.建筑节能监管体系中消费者与房地产开发商之间诚信博弈模型[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2014,28(3):66-69.
[28]刘晓君,张晨曦.既有居住建筑节能改造中业主与ESCO进化博弈分析——基于合同能源管理模式(EMC)[J].建筑经济,2015,36(9):100-103.
[29]朱茹琳.基于博弈分析的既有建筑节能改造经济激励政策研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2014.
[30]侯静,武涌,刘伊生.既有公共建筑节能改造市场化途径研究[J].城市发展研究,2014,21(6):1-5.
[31]郭汉丁,马兴能,尚伶.既有建筑节能改造市场培育实践与理论研究综述[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(18):151-156.
[32]马兴能,郭汉丁,尚伶.国内外既有建筑节能改造市场培育实践研究分析[J].建筑节能,2012,40(2):71-74.