营商环境建设中的政府责任:历史逻辑、理论逻辑与实践逻辑
|
摘要
营商环境建设中的政府责任具有历史、理论和实践三重内在逻辑。从历史逻辑来看,营商环境建设中的政府责任经历了起步、拓展、调整优化和全面协同四个从混沌到清晰的发展阶段;从理论逻辑来看,作为公共产品和公共治理结果的营商环境具有非排他性、非竞争性、社会需求性以及多元性和复杂性等特征,决定了政府在营商环境建设中负有首要和主导责任。同时,从政府与市场关系的理论视角探寻营商环境政府责任的边界、内容和方式;从实践逻辑来看,营商环境建设中的政府责任包括从顶层设计到地方政策落地的自上而下的实践逻辑、从地方政府改革试点到中央政府总结推广自下而上的实践逻辑以及地区间对标先进的横向实践逻辑。
The government responsibility in the business environment construction has triple logics of history, theory and practice. From the perspective of historical logic, the government responsibility in the business environment construction has gone through four stages from chaos to clarity: starting,expanding, adjusting and optimizing, and comprehensively coordinating. From the point of theoretical logic, the business environment, as a public product and the result of public governance, is characterized by non-exclusivity, non-competitiveness, social demand, diversity and complexity, which determines that the government has the primary and leading responsibility in the business environment construction. At the same time, based on the theoretical perspective of the relationship between government and market,the paper explores the boundary content and mode of government responsibility of business environment;From the viewpoint of practical logic, government responsibilities in the construction of business environment include top-down practical logic from the top-level design to the implementation of local policies, from the pilot reform of local governments to the summary and promotion of bottom-up practical logic by the central government and the advanced horizontal practical logic of inter-regional benchmarking.
The government responsibility in the business environment construction has triple logics of history, theory and practice. From the perspective of historical logic, the government responsibility in the business environment construction has gone through four stages from chaos to clarity: starting,expanding, adjusting and optimizing, and comprehensively coordinating. From the point of theoretical logic, the business environment, as a public product and the result of public governance, is characterized by non-exclusivity, non-competitiveness, social demand, diversity and complexity, which determines that the government has the primary and leading responsibility in the business environment construction. At the same time, based on the theoretical perspective of the relationship between government and market,the paper explores the boundary content and mode of government responsibility of business environment;From the viewpoint of practical logic, government responsibilities in the construction of business environment include top-down practical logic from the top-level design to the implementation of local policies, from the pilot reform of local governments to the summary and promotion of bottom-up practical logic by the central government and the advanced horizontal practical logic of inter-regional benchmarking.
引文
[1]Balchin L.Trade-related business climate and manufacturing export performance in Africa:a firm-level analysis[J].Journal of Development Perspectives,2008,4(1):32-66.
[2]Arbatli M E.Economic policies and FDI inflows to emerging market economies[M].Internationa Monetary Fund,2011:14-18.
[3]Carlin W,Seabright P.Bring me sunshine:which parts of the business climate should public policy try to fix[J].ABCDE,2009:99.
[4]Klapper L,Lewin A,Delgado J M Q.The impact of the business environment on the business cre ation process[M]//Entrepreneurship and Economic Development.Palgrave Macmillan,London,2011:108-123.
[5]Bah E,Fang L.Impact of the business environment on output and productivity in Africa[J].Journa of Development Economics,2015,114:159-171.
[6]何立胜.改善营商环境建设开放型经济新体制[J].现代国企研究,2018(9):60-62.
[7]娄成武,张国勇.治理视阈下的营商环境:内在逻辑与构建思路[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(2):59-65+177.
[8]董志强,魏下海,汤灿晴.制度软环境与经济发展---基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J].管理世界,2012(4):9-20.
[9]魏下海,董志强,张永璟.营商制度环境为何如此重要?---来自民营企业家“内治外攘”的经验证据[J].经济科学,2015(2):105-116.
[10]张季平,骆温平,刘永亮.营商环境对制造业与物流业联动发展影响研究[J].管理学刊,2017(5):25-33.
[11]周超,刘夏,辜转.营商环境与中国对外直接投资---基于投资动机的视角[J].国际贸易问题,2017(1):143-152.
[12]江静.制度、营商环境与服务业发展---来自世界银行《全球营商环境报告》的证据[J].学海,2017(1):176-183.
[13]袁宁.东北文化环境对民营企业家成长的影响解析[J].东北亚论坛,2008(5):68-72.
[14]许可,王瑛.后危机时代对中国营商环境的再认识---基于世界银行对中国2700家私营企业调研数据的实证分析[J].改革与战略,2014(7):118-124.
[15]笪可宁,彭一峰,郭宝荣.基于熵权法的城市营商环境问题研究---以沈阳市为例[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):250-255.
[16]娄成武,张国勇.基于市场主体主观感知的营商环境评估框架构建---兼评世界银行营商环境评估模式[J].当代经济管理,2018(6):60-68.
[17]魏淑艳,孙峰.东北地区投资营商环境评估与优化对策[J].长白学刊,2017(6):84-92.
[18]杨涛.营商环境评价指标体系构建研究-基于鲁苏浙粤四省的比较分析[J].商业经济研究,2015(13):28-31.
[19]张威.我国营商环境存在的问题及优化建议[J].理论学刊,2017(5):60-72.
[20]洪海.从世界银行评价指标体系入手全面优化营商环境[J].中国市场监管研究,2018(3):72-74.
[21]王晓玲.辽宁自贸试验区营商环境评价与优化[J].东北财经大学学报,2018(4):90-97.
[22]张波.企业营商环境指标的国际比较及我国的对策[J].经济纵横,2006(10):62-65.
[23]史长宽,梁会君.营商环境省际差异与扩大进口---基于30个省级横截面数据的经验研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2013(5):12-23.
[24]方世荣.东北振兴中的营商环境治理-关于拓展行政公益诉讼范围的思考[J].社会科学辑刊,2018(4):49-54.
[25]李新宝.行业协会、异地商会在优化营商环境中应发挥好桥梁纽带作用[J].辽宁经济,2018(4):60-61.
[26]潘同人.嵌入关系:中国招商引资中的政府与市场[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2017:77.
[27]秦颖.论公共产品的本质---兼论公共产品理论的局限性[J].经济学家,2006(3):77-82.
[28]刘易斯.经济增长理论[M],梁小民译,上海:上海三联书店,1994:78.
(1)参见1980年8月颁布的《广东经济特区条例》。
(1)3月中旬至5月,首批在北京、上海、厦门、深圳、武汉、沈阳、成都、杭州、兰州、辽宁葫芦岛、浙江衢州、陕西延安12个城市开展试评价。根据试评价地方反馈的意见,对指标进行了调试修正。4月下旬至6月,第二批在天津、重庆、青岛、广州、南京、合肥、贵阳、湖北襄阳、海南三亚、浙江义乌10个城市。
[2]Arbatli M E.Economic policies and FDI inflows to emerging market economies[M].Internationa Monetary Fund,2011:14-18.
[3]Carlin W,Seabright P.Bring me sunshine:which parts of the business climate should public policy try to fix[J].ABCDE,2009:99.
[4]Klapper L,Lewin A,Delgado J M Q.The impact of the business environment on the business cre ation process[M]//Entrepreneurship and Economic Development.Palgrave Macmillan,London,2011:108-123.
[5]Bah E,Fang L.Impact of the business environment on output and productivity in Africa[J].Journa of Development Economics,2015,114:159-171.
[6]何立胜.改善营商环境建设开放型经济新体制[J].现代国企研究,2018(9):60-62.
[7]娄成武,张国勇.治理视阈下的营商环境:内在逻辑与构建思路[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(2):59-65+177.
[8]董志强,魏下海,汤灿晴.制度软环境与经济发展---基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J].管理世界,2012(4):9-20.
[9]魏下海,董志强,张永璟.营商制度环境为何如此重要?---来自民营企业家“内治外攘”的经验证据[J].经济科学,2015(2):105-116.
[10]张季平,骆温平,刘永亮.营商环境对制造业与物流业联动发展影响研究[J].管理学刊,2017(5):25-33.
[11]周超,刘夏,辜转.营商环境与中国对外直接投资---基于投资动机的视角[J].国际贸易问题,2017(1):143-152.
[12]江静.制度、营商环境与服务业发展---来自世界银行《全球营商环境报告》的证据[J].学海,2017(1):176-183.
[13]袁宁.东北文化环境对民营企业家成长的影响解析[J].东北亚论坛,2008(5):68-72.
[14]许可,王瑛.后危机时代对中国营商环境的再认识---基于世界银行对中国2700家私营企业调研数据的实证分析[J].改革与战略,2014(7):118-124.
[15]笪可宁,彭一峰,郭宝荣.基于熵权法的城市营商环境问题研究---以沈阳市为例[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):250-255.
[16]娄成武,张国勇.基于市场主体主观感知的营商环境评估框架构建---兼评世界银行营商环境评估模式[J].当代经济管理,2018(6):60-68.
[17]魏淑艳,孙峰.东北地区投资营商环境评估与优化对策[J].长白学刊,2017(6):84-92.
[18]杨涛.营商环境评价指标体系构建研究-基于鲁苏浙粤四省的比较分析[J].商业经济研究,2015(13):28-31.
[19]张威.我国营商环境存在的问题及优化建议[J].理论学刊,2017(5):60-72.
[20]洪海.从世界银行评价指标体系入手全面优化营商环境[J].中国市场监管研究,2018(3):72-74.
[21]王晓玲.辽宁自贸试验区营商环境评价与优化[J].东北财经大学学报,2018(4):90-97.
[22]张波.企业营商环境指标的国际比较及我国的对策[J].经济纵横,2006(10):62-65.
[23]史长宽,梁会君.营商环境省际差异与扩大进口---基于30个省级横截面数据的经验研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2013(5):12-23.
[24]方世荣.东北振兴中的营商环境治理-关于拓展行政公益诉讼范围的思考[J].社会科学辑刊,2018(4):49-54.
[25]李新宝.行业协会、异地商会在优化营商环境中应发挥好桥梁纽带作用[J].辽宁经济,2018(4):60-61.
[26]潘同人.嵌入关系:中国招商引资中的政府与市场[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2017:77.
[27]秦颖.论公共产品的本质---兼论公共产品理论的局限性[J].经济学家,2006(3):77-82.
[28]刘易斯.经济增长理论[M],梁小民译,上海:上海三联书店,1994:78.
(1)参见1980年8月颁布的《广东经济特区条例》。
(1)3月中旬至5月,首批在北京、上海、厦门、深圳、武汉、沈阳、成都、杭州、兰州、辽宁葫芦岛、浙江衢州、陕西延安12个城市开展试评价。根据试评价地方反馈的意见,对指标进行了调试修正。4月下旬至6月,第二批在天津、重庆、青岛、广州、南京、合肥、贵阳、湖北襄阳、海南三亚、浙江义乌10个城市。