中国城镇居民住房政策偏好的影响因素分析
|
摘要
居民住房政策偏好是住房政策设计与调整的依据,会受到客观和主观层面的因素影响。本文基于一项全国问卷调查数据,从客观和主观层面对城镇居民住房政策偏好影响因素的研究表明,客观层面的个人年收入水平、主观层面的房价满意度等因素都会对住房政策偏好产生影响。个人年收入水平越高,就越认为应当对房价进行干预;对房价的接受程度越高,就越不倾向于支持对房价进行干预。如果将房价偏高归因于监管不力,就越认为应当干预房价;如果将房价偏高归因于炒房,就越会支持对房价进行干预。如果对于房价的接受程度越高,就越不认为政府应当提供保障性住房。如果将房价上涨归因于土地政策不合理,就更为支持提供保障性住房;如果将房价偏高归因于政府监管不力,就越会支持提供保障性住房。相关发现对于住房政策的调整具有积极借鉴意义。
The housing policy preference,as the basis of designing and adjusting housing policies,can be affected by the objective and subjective content. Based on data from a national survey,the research on the factors affecting the housing policy preference of urban residents from the objective and subjective levels shows that the objective level of individual income and the subjective level of house price satisfaction will affect the housing policy preference. Specifically,the higher the individual's annual income level,the more the house price is considered to be intervened,while the higher the acceptance of the house price,the less support for the intervention. If the higher house price is due to poor supervision,the house price is more likely to be intervened,while if it is attributed to real estate,it is more likely to support the housing price intervention. If the acceptability of housing prices is higher,the government should not provide affordable housing. If the price rise is attributable to the unreasonable land policy,and if the high house price is due to poor government supervision,there will be more support for the provision of affordable housing. Related findings may provide positive implications for housing policy adjustment.
The housing policy preference,as the basis of designing and adjusting housing policies,can be affected by the objective and subjective content. Based on data from a national survey,the research on the factors affecting the housing policy preference of urban residents from the objective and subjective levels shows that the objective level of individual income and the subjective level of house price satisfaction will affect the housing policy preference. Specifically,the higher the individual's annual income level,the more the house price is considered to be intervened,while the higher the acceptance of the house price,the less support for the intervention. If the higher house price is due to poor supervision,the house price is more likely to be intervened,while if it is attributed to real estate,it is more likely to support the housing price intervention. If the acceptability of housing prices is higher,the government should not provide affordable housing. If the price rise is attributable to the unreasonable land policy,and if the high house price is due to poor government supervision,there will be more support for the provision of affordable housing. Related findings may provide positive implications for housing policy adjustment.
引文
[1]阿韦尔.居住与住房[M].齐淑琴,译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
[2]阿布朗.人人都要房子住[M].丁寒,译.香港:今日中国出版社,1975.
[3]张群.居有其屋:中国住房权历史研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[4]王宏哲.适足住房权研究[C]∥徐显明.人权研究(第7卷).济南:山东人民出版社,2007.
[5]张群.居有其屋:中国住房权历史研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[6]刘洪玉,郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[7]施瓦兹.美国住房政策[M].黄瑛,译.北京:中信出版社,2008.
[8]孙洛龟.房地产阶级社会[M].芦恒,译.南京:译林出版社,2012.
[9]刘洪玉,郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[10]谢宇,张晓波,李建新,等.中国民生发展报告(2014)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[11]袁浩,马丹.上海社会质量与居民生活满意度研究[M]∥张海东.社会质量研究:理论、方法与经验.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[12]李友梅.上海调查:2009[M].上海:上海大学出版社,2010.
[13]钟君,吴正杲.中国城市基本公共服务力评价(2014)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
[14]朱亚鹏.住房制度改革:政策创新与住房公平:[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2007.
[15]郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[16]李斌.中国城市居住空间阶层化研究[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2013.
[17]唐晓岚.城市居住分化现象研究:对南京城市居住社区的社会学分析[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2007.
[18]黄怡.城市社会分层与居住隔离[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2006.
[19]吴启焰.大城市居住空间分异的理论与实证研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[20]麻宝斌,杜平.社会正义测评:主题、内容与框架[J].理论探讨,2014(2):5-10.
[21]谢宇.上海社会质量研究(2010-2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[22]谢宇,张晓波,李建新,等.中国民生发展报告(2013)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[23]刘祖云,毛小平.中国城市住房分层:基于2010年广州市千户问卷调查[J].中国社会科学,2012(2):94-109.
[24]张海东.上海社会质量研究(2010-2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[25]国务院发展研究中心课题组.中国民生调查2015[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2016.
[26]李斌.住房利益分化与社会分层机制变迁[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2004.
[27]WHITE J M.American neighborhoods and residential differentiation[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1988.
[28]李强.转型时期城市“住房地位群体”[J].江苏社会科学,2009(4):42-53.
[29]建设部课题组.多层次住房保障体系研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
(1)世界人权宣言,http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/chn.pdf.
(1)《2016年第四季度城镇储户问卷调查报告》,中国人民银行,http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/3222094/201612291-4284392008.pdf。
[2]阿布朗.人人都要房子住[M].丁寒,译.香港:今日中国出版社,1975.
[3]张群.居有其屋:中国住房权历史研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[4]王宏哲.适足住房权研究[C]∥徐显明.人权研究(第7卷).济南:山东人民出版社,2007.
[5]张群.居有其屋:中国住房权历史研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2009.
[6]刘洪玉,郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[7]施瓦兹.美国住房政策[M].黄瑛,译.北京:中信出版社,2008.
[8]孙洛龟.房地产阶级社会[M].芦恒,译.南京:译林出版社,2012.
[9]刘洪玉,郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[10]谢宇,张晓波,李建新,等.中国民生发展报告(2014)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2014.
[11]袁浩,马丹.上海社会质量与居民生活满意度研究[M]∥张海东.社会质量研究:理论、方法与经验.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011.
[12]李友梅.上海调查:2009[M].上海:上海大学出版社,2010.
[13]钟君,吴正杲.中国城市基本公共服务力评价(2014)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
[14]朱亚鹏.住房制度改革:政策创新与住房公平:[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2007.
[15]郑思齐.城市与房地产经济学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
[16]李斌.中国城市居住空间阶层化研究[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2013.
[17]唐晓岚.城市居住分化现象研究:对南京城市居住社区的社会学分析[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2007.
[18]黄怡.城市社会分层与居住隔离[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2006.
[19]吴启焰.大城市居住空间分异的理论与实证研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2016.
[20]麻宝斌,杜平.社会正义测评:主题、内容与框架[J].理论探讨,2014(2):5-10.
[21]谢宇.上海社会质量研究(2010-2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[22]谢宇,张晓波,李建新,等.中国民生发展报告(2013)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
[23]刘祖云,毛小平.中国城市住房分层:基于2010年广州市千户问卷调查[J].中国社会科学,2012(2):94-109.
[24]张海东.上海社会质量研究(2010-2013)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2016.
[25]国务院发展研究中心课题组.中国民生调查2015[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2016.
[26]李斌.住房利益分化与社会分层机制变迁[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2004.
[27]WHITE J M.American neighborhoods and residential differentiation[M].New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1988.
[28]李强.转型时期城市“住房地位群体”[J].江苏社会科学,2009(4):42-53.
[29]建设部课题组.多层次住房保障体系研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.
(1)世界人权宣言,http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/chn.pdf.
(1)《2016年第四季度城镇储户问卷调查报告》,中国人民银行,http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/3222094/201612291-4284392008.pdf。