大数据背景下数据权利的法理分析
|
摘要
科技的进步不断地扩展人们对权利范畴的探索。随之深入以后,不仅仅是对人们权利意识的开拓,更是对传统权利领域的变革。数据作为信息技术发展后的存储介质,自发地与人们的财产权利、人格权利相连接,形成了一种存在广泛争议的权利形态,并且需要得到自身发展的路径。因为主体对数据运用所产生的社会关系,不可避免地要面对一些窘境,只有积极地把数据权利纳入到法律体系范围内,才能依靠良性的规制手段去解决存在的问题。在私法中,"法无规定皆自由"的精神,使我们看到民法领域可以作为数据权利进入法律体系的突破口,提升整个社会对数据权利的认知。
The advancement of science and technology continues to expand people's exploration of the scope of rights. Afterwards,it has not only enhanced people's rights awareness,but also transformed the traditional rights. As a storage medium for the development of information technology,data are spontaneously connected with people's property rights and dignity rights,forming a formulation of rights that is controversial and needs to be developed. Because the social relationship generated by data use of the subjects inevitably faces some dilemmas,we can rely on benign regulatory measures to solve the current problems only by actively incorporating data rights into the legal system. In the private law,the spirit of "The law is free of rules"enables us to understand that the civil law can be used as a breakthrough in the entry of data rights into the legal system,and enhance the awareness of data rights in society as a whole.
The advancement of science and technology continues to expand people's exploration of the scope of rights. Afterwards,it has not only enhanced people's rights awareness,but also transformed the traditional rights. As a storage medium for the development of information technology,data are spontaneously connected with people's property rights and dignity rights,forming a formulation of rights that is controversial and needs to be developed. Because the social relationship generated by data use of the subjects inevitably faces some dilemmas,we can rely on benign regulatory measures to solve the current problems only by actively incorporating data rights into the legal system. In the private law,the spirit of "The law is free of rules"enables us to understand that the civil law can be used as a breakthrough in the entry of data rights into the legal system,and enhance the awareness of data rights in society as a whole.
引文
[1]梅夏英.数据的法律属性与民法定位[J].中国社会科学,2016(9):164-183.
[2]肖冬梅,文禹衡.数据权谱系论纲[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(6):69-75.
[3]杨立新,杜泽夏.被遗忘权的权利归属与保护标准———任甲玉诉百度公司被遗忘权案裁判理由评述[J].法律适用(司法案例),2017(16):29-39.
[4]李爱君.数据权利属性与法律特征[J].东方法学,2018(3):64-74.
[5]程啸.论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J].中国社会科学,2018(2):103-122.
[6]常健.论权利的合理性基础[J].南开学报,1998(5):1-9.
[7]郭瑜.个人数据保护法研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012(3):176.
[8]任彦.捍卫“数据主权”[N].人民日报,2015-01-14(24).
[9]沈国麟.大数据时代的数据主权和国家数据战略[J].南京社会科学,2014(6):113-119.
[10]齐爱民,盘佳.数据权、数据主权的确立与大数据保护的基本原则[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(1):64-70.
[11]王泽鉴.民法思维———请求权基础理论体系[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009(12):41.
[12]王渊,黄道丽,杨松儒.数据权的权利性质及其归属研究[J].科学管理研究,2017(5):37-40.
[2]肖冬梅,文禹衡.数据权谱系论纲[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(6):69-75.
[3]杨立新,杜泽夏.被遗忘权的权利归属与保护标准———任甲玉诉百度公司被遗忘权案裁判理由评述[J].法律适用(司法案例),2017(16):29-39.
[4]李爱君.数据权利属性与法律特征[J].东方法学,2018(3):64-74.
[5]程啸.论大数据时代的个人数据权利[J].中国社会科学,2018(2):103-122.
[6]常健.论权利的合理性基础[J].南开学报,1998(5):1-9.
[7]郭瑜.个人数据保护法研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012(3):176.
[8]任彦.捍卫“数据主权”[N].人民日报,2015-01-14(24).
[9]沈国麟.大数据时代的数据主权和国家数据战略[J].南京社会科学,2014(6):113-119.
[10]齐爱民,盘佳.数据权、数据主权的确立与大数据保护的基本原则[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(1):64-70.
[11]王泽鉴.民法思维———请求权基础理论体系[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009(12):41.
[12]王渊,黄道丽,杨松儒.数据权的权利性质及其归属研究[J].科学管理研究,2017(5):37-40.