新世纪以来中国文学理论批评史撰著述论
|
摘要
新世纪以来,中国文学理论批评史的撰著在通史、断代史、分体史、专题史等方面都呈现出鲜明的特色。通史的撰著既强化个性鲜明的学术特色,又要求其具有科学性;断代文学批评史的撰著进一步细密化,使传统文论史显示出动态性与鲜活化的特征;分体文学批评史的撰著,更体现出传统文论史内在的逻辑性;专题文学批评史的撰著,表明文论史的建构正朝着多维度与精细化的方向发展。上述几个方面,标示出中国文学批评史这一学科的日见兴盛与成熟。
Since the beginning of the new century,the works of Chinese literary criticism history has shown striking characteristics in terms of general history,dynastic history,different-genre history and specialized history.The works of general history not only strengthens the academic characteristics of distinctive personality,but also strives to make it more scientific.The works of the history of dynastic literary criticism is further refined and the history of traditional literary criticism shows more dynamic and vivid characteristics.The works of the history of different-genre literary criticism helps the history of traditional literary criticism display more inherent logicality.The works of the history of thematic literary criticism shows that the construction of the history of literary criticism is moving towards a multi-dimensional and refined direction.The above aspects indicate the prosperity and maturity of the discipline of Chinese literary criticism.
Since the beginning of the new century,the works of Chinese literary criticism history has shown striking characteristics in terms of general history,dynastic history,different-genre history and specialized history.The works of general history not only strengthens the academic characteristics of distinctive personality,but also strives to make it more scientific.The works of the history of dynastic literary criticism is further refined and the history of traditional literary criticism shows more dynamic and vivid characteristics.The works of the history of different-genre literary criticism helps the history of traditional literary criticism display more inherent logicality.The works of the history of thematic literary criticism shows that the construction of the history of literary criticism is moving towards a multi-dimensional and refined direction.The above aspects indicate the prosperity and maturity of the discipline of Chinese literary criticism.
引文
[1]周兴陆.中国文论通史[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2018:574.
[2]黄霖.中国文学理论批评史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.
[3]张毅.罗宗强先生的中国文学思想史研究[J].阴山学刊,2002(4).
[4]徐雁平.清代诗学史的拓展与开掘——评蒋寅著《〈清代诗学史〉(第一卷)》[J].中华文史论丛,2013(4):375-387.
[5]刘少坤.清代词律批评理论史[M].北京:人民出版社,2015:1.
[2]黄霖.中国文学理论批评史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2018.
[3]张毅.罗宗强先生的中国文学思想史研究[J].阴山学刊,2002(4).
[4]徐雁平.清代诗学史的拓展与开掘——评蒋寅著《〈清代诗学史〉(第一卷)》[J].中华文史论丛,2013(4):375-387.
[5]刘少坤.清代词律批评理论史[M].北京:人民出版社,2015:1.