2014～2018年中英文期刊论文“一带一路”研究对比分析
|
摘要
[目的/意义]随着"一带一路"走实走深,相关研究也逐渐增多,本文试图探究与对比分析中英文期刊论文中"一带一路"主题的研究特点,为相关研究提供参考。[方法/过程]选取中国知网(CNKI)和Web of Science数据库作为数据来源,通过文献计量学方法对"一带一路"相关主题下的中英文期刊论文进行计量分析,利用共词分析法、聚类分析法等多种方法梳理并总结了2014～2018年中英文"一带一路"研究论文的发文走势、高产作者、研究主题、科研机构合著等发展情况和研究热点。[结果/结论]研究发现,国际期刊中"一带一路"相关研究的数量仍然较少,但增长极快。从研究主题来看,国内外学者均聚焦于政策沟通、设施联通、贸易畅通和资金融通四个方面,对历史文化与交流的研究相对较少。但与此同时在这一研究领域,国际期刊的相关文章多出自中国的研究机构,国内外科研论文合作网络也仍处于萌芽阶段。
[Purpose/significance] With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI), related research has gradually increased. This paper attempts to explore the research characteristics of BRI studies in Chinese and English journals to provide references for related research. [Method/process] Taking Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Web of Science databases as data sources, this paper analyses the journal articles relevant to BRI studies published in 2014-2018 by bibliometric methods. It makes a survey of their development, including article publishing trends, high-yield authors, research topics,cooperation between research institutions as well as research hotspots by co-word analysis, cluster analysis and some other methods. [Result/conclusion] This paper finds that the number of the articles related to BRI researches in international journals was small, but it was growing extremely fast. Scholars at home and abroad all focused on the topics of policy coordination, connectivity of infrastructure and facilities, unimpeded trade, and financial integration, while fewer articles focused on historical and cultural exchanges. At the same time, the relevant articles in international journals were mostly from Chinese research institutions, and the cooperation network of research at home and abroad was still in its infancy.
[Purpose/significance] With the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative(BRI), related research has gradually increased. This paper attempts to explore the research characteristics of BRI studies in Chinese and English journals to provide references for related research. [Method/process] Taking Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Web of Science databases as data sources, this paper analyses the journal articles relevant to BRI studies published in 2014-2018 by bibliometric methods. It makes a survey of their development, including article publishing trends, high-yield authors, research topics,cooperation between research institutions as well as research hotspots by co-word analysis, cluster analysis and some other methods. [Result/conclusion] This paper finds that the number of the articles related to BRI researches in international journals was small, but it was growing extremely fast. Scholars at home and abroad all focused on the topics of policy coordination, connectivity of infrastructure and facilities, unimpeded trade, and financial integration, while fewer articles focused on historical and cultural exchanges. At the same time, the relevant articles in international journals were mostly from Chinese research institutions, and the cooperation network of research at home and abroad was still in its infancy.
引文
[1]刘卫东.“一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(5):538-544.
[2]胡鞍钢,马伟,鄢一龙.“丝绸之路经济带”:战略内涵、定位和实现路径[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,35(2):1-11.
[3]邹嘉龄,刘春腊,尹国庆,唐志鹏.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易格局及其经济贡献[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(5):598-605.
[4]陈汝模,佘泽鑫,孟雪梅.我国图情档领域“一带一路”研究文献的可视化分析[J].高校图书馆工作,2017,37(5):21-29.
[5]黄娟.基于文献计量的中国“一带一路”研究综述[J].南宁职业技术学院学报, 2019, 24(1):21-28.
[6]王连喜,蒋盛益,李霞,甘穗福.“一带一路”:研究热点与新兴主题发展分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(2):71-77.
[7]吴建南,杨若愚,郑长旭.中国与发达国家及“一带一路”国家科技合作态势对比分析[J].情报杂志,2015,34(11):79-83.
[8]周静梅,黄颖,汪雪锋,陈云,付芸,马萍萍.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科研合作态势研究——基于Web of Science的计量分析[J].情报工程,2016,2(4):69-79.
[9]金卓,杨若愚.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科技合作中高影响力文献特征研究——基于ESI数据库高被引论文的计量分析[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(20):14-20.
[10]余丹丹,宋秀琚.台湾学界对“一带一路”倡议的研究综述[J].现代台湾研究,2019(1):13-19.
[11]李灏.英国《卫报》(网络版)“一带一路”新闻报道研究(2013.9-2017.9)[D].湖南:湘潭大学,2018.
[12]邱均平,吕红.国内高等教育质量保障研究现状及热点分析[J].中国高校科技,2012(12):70-75.
[13]朱庆华,彭希羡,刘璇.基于共词分析的社会计算领域的研究主题[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(12):7-11+6.
[14]王一博,郭鑫,王继民.基于词共现的大数据研究主题分析[J].图书馆论坛,2014,34(8):96-102.
[15]推动共建丝绸之路经济带和21世纪海上丝绸之路的愿景与行动[EB/OL].[2017-04-25].http://ydyl.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0425/c411837-29235511.html.
[2]胡鞍钢,马伟,鄢一龙.“丝绸之路经济带”:战略内涵、定位和实现路径[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,35(2):1-11.
[3]邹嘉龄,刘春腊,尹国庆,唐志鹏.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易格局及其经济贡献[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(5):598-605.
[4]陈汝模,佘泽鑫,孟雪梅.我国图情档领域“一带一路”研究文献的可视化分析[J].高校图书馆工作,2017,37(5):21-29.
[5]黄娟.基于文献计量的中国“一带一路”研究综述[J].南宁职业技术学院学报, 2019, 24(1):21-28.
[6]王连喜,蒋盛益,李霞,甘穗福.“一带一路”:研究热点与新兴主题发展分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(2):71-77.
[7]吴建南,杨若愚,郑长旭.中国与发达国家及“一带一路”国家科技合作态势对比分析[J].情报杂志,2015,34(11):79-83.
[8]周静梅,黄颖,汪雪锋,陈云,付芸,马萍萍.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科研合作态势研究——基于Web of Science的计量分析[J].情报工程,2016,2(4):69-79.
[9]金卓,杨若愚.中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科技合作中高影响力文献特征研究——基于ESI数据库高被引论文的计量分析[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(20):14-20.
[10]余丹丹,宋秀琚.台湾学界对“一带一路”倡议的研究综述[J].现代台湾研究,2019(1):13-19.
[11]李灏.英国《卫报》(网络版)“一带一路”新闻报道研究(2013.9-2017.9)[D].湖南:湘潭大学,2018.
[12]邱均平,吕红.国内高等教育质量保障研究现状及热点分析[J].中国高校科技,2012(12):70-75.
[13]朱庆华,彭希羡,刘璇.基于共词分析的社会计算领域的研究主题[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(12):7-11+6.
[14]王一博,郭鑫,王继民.基于词共现的大数据研究主题分析[J].图书馆论坛,2014,34(8):96-102.
[15]推动共建丝绸之路经济带和21世纪海上丝绸之路的愿景与行动[EB/OL].[2017-04-25].http://ydyl.people.com.cn/n1/2017/0425/c411837-29235511.html.