摘要
在创新驱动背景下,创新已成为全社会的共识,企业创新速度备受关注。从宏观作用机制方面对企业创新速度进行分析,利用面板门槛回归模型对企业创新速度特征进行研究。结果发现:①企业创新速度对创新成果具有正向促进作用;②创新速度并非越快越好,其与创新成果呈倒U型关系;③创新速度自身存在门槛效应,创新速度越快,其对创新结果的弹性系数也就越大;④创新速度存在创新成果门槛效应,企业创新成果越多,创新速度对其的弹性系数也就越高。
In the context of innovation-driven,innovation has become a consensus of society,and speed of businesses innovation is also a concern.This paper first analyzes the mechanism of businesses innovation through the mechanism of micro overlay mechanism and macro action mechanism.Then,this paper uses the panel threshold regression model to study the characteristics of businesses innovation speed.Empirical research shows that:the innovation speed of high technology businesses has a positive effect on the innovation results,for the innovation speed.It would not be the sooner the better,the innovation speed and innovation results in the inverted U curve relationship.The innovation speed has threshold effect,the faster the innovation speed is,the greater the elasticity coefficient of innovation results.Innovation speed has threshold effect of innovation results,the greater the innovation results are,the higher the elasticity coefficient of innovation speed.
引文
[1]孙卫,徐昂,尚磊.创新速度理论研究评述与展望[J].科技进步与对策,2010(4):156-160.
[2]张赤东.企业创新政策体系与使用指南[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2017:112-118.
[3]URBAN G L,CARTERT S,GASKIN Z M.Market share rewards to pioneering brands:an empirical analysis and strategic implications[J].Management Science,1986,32(6):645-659.
[4]张赤东.创新型企业评价理论与实践[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2015:66-71.
[5]MANISFIELD E.The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and United States:external vs.internal technology[J].Management Science,1988,34:1157-1169.
[6]KESSLER E H,CHAKRABARTI A K.Innovation speed:a conceptual model of context,antecedents and outcomes[J].Academy of Management Review,1996(21):1143-1491.
[7]COHEN M A,ELIASHBERG J.New product development:the performance and time-to-market tradeoff[J].Management Science,1996,42(2):173-186.
[8]GRIFFIN A.The voice of the customer[J].Marketing Science,1993,12(1):1-27.
[9]MURMANN P A.Expected development time reductions in the german mechanical engineering industry[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,1994,11(3):236-252.
[10]KARAGOZOGLU N,BROWN W B.Time-based management of the new product development process[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,1993,10(3):204-215.
[11]ZIRGER B J,HARTLEY J L.The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time[J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,1996(43):143-152.
[12]马永远.新产品开发团队时间压力、自省性与创新绩效[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(2):139-146.
[13]CHEN J Y,REILLY R R,LYNN G S.New product development speed:too much of a good thing[J].Journal of product Innovation Management,2012,29(2):288-303.
[14]STREICHER G,SCHIBANY A,GRETZMACHER N.Input additionality effects of R&D subsidies in Austria[M].sterr Institution Wirtsch,2004:9-15.
[15]GRILICHES Z.Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1979(1):92-116.
[16]JAFFEA B.Real effects of academic research[J].The A-merican Economic Review,1989(5):957-970.
[17]MUNDLAK Y.Empirical productions free of management bias[J].Journal of Farm Economics,1961(43):44-56.
[18]BLUNDELL R,BOND S.Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models[J].Journal of E-conometrics,1998,87:115-143.
[19]GRILICHES Z.Patent sstatistics as economic indicators:a survey[J].Journal of economic literature,1990,28(12):1661-1707.
[20]HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation,testing and inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999,(93):345-368.