全球化、金融危机与韩国发展型国家的转型
摘要
随着发展型政策的长期推行,韩国积累了大量需要应对的老问题,新自由主义被认为是解决这些问题的唯一选择,但以此为指导的改革显然超出了应对问题的范畴,最终导致韩国发展型国家趋向解体。韩国经验表明,发展型国家的转型是一个相对独立于发展型国家本身的政治经济议题,对这类体制的新自由主义改革及其后果取决于发展的"外部性"、政治体制转型、国家能力的变化、危机事件的诊断及其应对方式等。
引文
(1)[美]查默斯·约翰逊《通产省与日本奇迹——产业政策的成长(1925—1975)》吉林出版集团2010年版第341—342页。
(2)朱天飚《发展型国家的衰落》,载于《经济社会体制比较》2005年第5期。
(3)Yu-Shan Wu,“Taiwan’s Developmental State:After the Economic and Political Turmoil”,in Asian Survey,Vol.47,No.6,2007,pp.977-1001.
(4)[美]阿图尔·科利《国家引导的发展——全球边缘地区的政治权力与工业化》吉林出版集团2007年版第21页。
(1)Robert Wade,“Japan,the World Bank,and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance:The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective”,in New Left Review,Vol.217,1996,pp.3-36.
(2)Jung-En Woo,Race to the Swift:State and Finance in Korean Industrialization,New York:Columbia University Press,1991,p.163.
(3)David Chamberlin Cole and Yung Chul Park,Financial Development in Korea,1945-1978,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1983,p.66.
(4)张振华《社会冲突与制度回应:转型期中国政治整合机制的调适研究》天津人民出版社2016年版第204页。
(5)Jung-En Woo,Race to the Swift:State and Finance in Korean Industrialization,New York:Columbia University Press,1991,p.163
(6)Elizabeth Thurbon and Linda Weiss,“Investing in Openness:The Evolution of FDI Strategy in South Korea and Taiwan”,in New Political Economy,Vol.11,No.1,2006,pp.1-22.
(1)Pyung Joo Kim,“Financial Institutions”,in Lee Jay Cho and Yoon-Hyung Kim(eds.),Korea’s Political Economy:An Institutional Perspective,Boulder:Westview,1994,pp.273-319.
(2)张振华《大企业主阶级与韩国民主化》,载于《当代韩国》2008年春季号。
(3)张振华《劳工阶级与韩国民主化》,载于《当代韩国》2005年冬季号。
(4)Doo-Seung Hong,Kim Byung-Jo and Jo Dong-Gi,Occupational Structure in Korea,Seoul:Seoul University Press,2003,p.141.
(5)张振华《公民社会兴起的政治意蕴:以韩国为样本》,载于《经济社会体制比较》2013年第3期。
(6)Eun Mee Kim,“Contradictions and Limits of a Developmental State:With Illustrations from the South Korean Case”,in Social Problems,Vol.40,No.2,1993,pp.228-249.
(7)任泽平《中国L型经济的三种可能:台湾模式、日韩模式和拉美模式》,参见华尔街见闻https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/229191。
(1)See Maxwell J.Fry,Money,Interest,and Banking in Economic Development,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1988;Ronald Mc Kinnon,Money and Capital in Economic Development,Washington,DC:Brookings Institution,1973.
(2)Arvid Lukauskas,“Financial Restriction and the Developmental State in East Asia:Toward a More Complex Political Economy”,in Comparative Political Studies,Vol.35,No.4,2002,pp.379-412.
(3)张振华《三星丑闻的“土壤”》,载于《中国企业家》2008年第9期。
(1)Pyung Joo Kim,“Financial Institutions”,in Lee Jay Cho and Yoon-Hyung Kim(eds.),Korea’s Political Economy:An Institutional Perspective,Boulder:Westview,1994,p.300.
(2)Carter J.Eckert,“The South Korean Bourgeoisie:A Class in Search of Hegemony”,in Journal of Korean Studies,Vol.7,1990,pp.115-148.
(1)Won-Am Park,“Financial Liberalization:The Korean Experience”,in Takatoshi Ito and Anne O.Krueger(eds.),Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1996,pp.254-255.
(2)Elizabeth Thurbon,“Ideational Inconsistency and Institutional Incapacity:Why Financial Liberalization in South Korea Went Horribly Wrong”,in New Political Economy,Vol.8,No.3,2003,pp.341-361.
(3)Yoon Je Cho,“The Political Economy of Financial Liberalization and the Crisis in South Korea”,in Chung H.Lee(ed.),Financial Liberalization and the Economic Crisis in Asia,London:Routledge,2003,p.84.
(4)See Joseph E.Stiglitz,Globalization and Its Discontents,Norton:New York,2002.
(1)最为典型的案例是,三星电子在这一时期进入已经饱和的家用汽车市场。
(2)Yeon-Ho Lee,“The Failure of the Weak State in Economic Liberalization:Liberalization,Democratization and the Financial Crisis in South Korea”,in The Pacific Review,Vol.13,No.1,2000,pp.115-131.
(3)张振华《解剖发展型国家:东亚奇迹的国家主义再解释》,载于《天津社会科学》2017年第3期。
(4)Chung-in Moon and Jongryn Mo,“Democracy and the Origins of the 1997 Korean Economic Crisis”,in Jongryn Mo and Chung-in Moon(eds.),Democracy and the Korean Economy,Stanford,CA:Hoover Institution Press,1998,pp.171-198.
(5)Moon and Rhyu,“The State,Structural Rigidity and The End of Asian Capitalism”,in Richard Robison,Mark Beeson,Kanishka Jayasuriya and Hyuk-Rae Kim(eds.),Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis,London:Routledge,2000,pp.77-98.
(6)Iain Pirie,“The New Korean State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.10,No.1,2005,pp.25-42;Kanishka Jayasuriya,“Beyond Institutional Fetishism:From the Developmental to the Regulatory State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.10,No.3,2005,pp.381-387.
(1)参见张振华、张彦华《去势的阶级:民主化与新自由主义情景下韩国劳工政治的嬗变》,载于《学海》2017年第2期。
(2)Sook-Jong Lee and Taejoon Han,“The Demise of‘Korea,Inc.’:Paradigm Shift in Korea’s Developmental State”,in Journal of Contemporary Asia,Vol.36,No.3,2006,pp.314-315.
(3)See Ronald Dore,Stock Market Capitalism:Welfare CapitalismJapan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons,New York:Oxford University Press,2000,Ch.4.
(4)Hyun-Chin Lim and Jin-Ho Jang,“Neo-liberalism in Postcrisis South Korea:Social Conditions and Outcomes”,in Journal of Contemporary Asia,Vol.36,No.4,2006,pp.442-463.
(5)Thomas Kalinowski and Hyekyung Cho,“The Political Economy of Financial Liberation in South Korea”,in Asian Survey,Vol.9,No.2,2009,pp.221-242.
(6)Thomas Kalinowski,“Korea’s Recovery Since the 1997/98Financial Crisis:The Last Stage of the Developmental State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.13,No.4,2008,pp.447-462.
(1)Elizabeth Thurbon and Linda Weiss,“Investing in Openness:the Evolution of FDI Strategy in South Korea and Taiwan”,in New Political Economy,Vol.11,No.1,2006,pp.1-22.
(2)Meredith Jung-En Woo,“After the Miracle:Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia”,in Meredith Jung-En Woo(eds.),Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2007,p.15.
(3)罗伯特·韦德(Robert Wade)区分了领导市场(leading the market)与追随市场(following the market)两种国家干预经济的方式,参见Robert Wade,Governing the Market:Economic Theory and The Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization,Princeton N.J.:Princeton University Press,1990,p.28.
(4)最为常见的情况是,总统所在的政党没能取得议会中的多数席位。
(5)See Ronald Mc Kinnon,The Order of Economic Liberalization:Financial Control in the Transition to a Market Economy,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1991.
(2)朱天飚《发展型国家的衰落》,载于《经济社会体制比较》2005年第5期。
(3)Yu-Shan Wu,“Taiwan’s Developmental State:After the Economic and Political Turmoil”,in Asian Survey,Vol.47,No.6,2007,pp.977-1001.
(4)[美]阿图尔·科利《国家引导的发展——全球边缘地区的政治权力与工业化》吉林出版集团2007年版第21页。
(1)Robert Wade,“Japan,the World Bank,and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance:The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective”,in New Left Review,Vol.217,1996,pp.3-36.
(2)Jung-En Woo,Race to the Swift:State and Finance in Korean Industrialization,New York:Columbia University Press,1991,p.163.
(3)David Chamberlin Cole and Yung Chul Park,Financial Development in Korea,1945-1978,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,1983,p.66.
(4)张振华《社会冲突与制度回应:转型期中国政治整合机制的调适研究》天津人民出版社2016年版第204页。
(5)Jung-En Woo,Race to the Swift:State and Finance in Korean Industrialization,New York:Columbia University Press,1991,p.163
(6)Elizabeth Thurbon and Linda Weiss,“Investing in Openness:The Evolution of FDI Strategy in South Korea and Taiwan”,in New Political Economy,Vol.11,No.1,2006,pp.1-22.
(1)Pyung Joo Kim,“Financial Institutions”,in Lee Jay Cho and Yoon-Hyung Kim(eds.),Korea’s Political Economy:An Institutional Perspective,Boulder:Westview,1994,pp.273-319.
(2)张振华《大企业主阶级与韩国民主化》,载于《当代韩国》2008年春季号。
(3)张振华《劳工阶级与韩国民主化》,载于《当代韩国》2005年冬季号。
(4)Doo-Seung Hong,Kim Byung-Jo and Jo Dong-Gi,Occupational Structure in Korea,Seoul:Seoul University Press,2003,p.141.
(5)张振华《公民社会兴起的政治意蕴:以韩国为样本》,载于《经济社会体制比较》2013年第3期。
(6)Eun Mee Kim,“Contradictions and Limits of a Developmental State:With Illustrations from the South Korean Case”,in Social Problems,Vol.40,No.2,1993,pp.228-249.
(7)任泽平《中国L型经济的三种可能:台湾模式、日韩模式和拉美模式》,参见华尔街见闻https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/229191。
(1)See Maxwell J.Fry,Money,Interest,and Banking in Economic Development,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1988;Ronald Mc Kinnon,Money and Capital in Economic Development,Washington,DC:Brookings Institution,1973.
(2)Arvid Lukauskas,“Financial Restriction and the Developmental State in East Asia:Toward a More Complex Political Economy”,in Comparative Political Studies,Vol.35,No.4,2002,pp.379-412.
(3)张振华《三星丑闻的“土壤”》,载于《中国企业家》2008年第9期。
(1)Pyung Joo Kim,“Financial Institutions”,in Lee Jay Cho and Yoon-Hyung Kim(eds.),Korea’s Political Economy:An Institutional Perspective,Boulder:Westview,1994,p.300.
(2)Carter J.Eckert,“The South Korean Bourgeoisie:A Class in Search of Hegemony”,in Journal of Korean Studies,Vol.7,1990,pp.115-148.
(1)Won-Am Park,“Financial Liberalization:The Korean Experience”,in Takatoshi Ito and Anne O.Krueger(eds.),Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia,Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1996,pp.254-255.
(2)Elizabeth Thurbon,“Ideational Inconsistency and Institutional Incapacity:Why Financial Liberalization in South Korea Went Horribly Wrong”,in New Political Economy,Vol.8,No.3,2003,pp.341-361.
(3)Yoon Je Cho,“The Political Economy of Financial Liberalization and the Crisis in South Korea”,in Chung H.Lee(ed.),Financial Liberalization and the Economic Crisis in Asia,London:Routledge,2003,p.84.
(4)See Joseph E.Stiglitz,Globalization and Its Discontents,Norton:New York,2002.
(1)最为典型的案例是,三星电子在这一时期进入已经饱和的家用汽车市场。
(2)Yeon-Ho Lee,“The Failure of the Weak State in Economic Liberalization:Liberalization,Democratization and the Financial Crisis in South Korea”,in The Pacific Review,Vol.13,No.1,2000,pp.115-131.
(3)张振华《解剖发展型国家:东亚奇迹的国家主义再解释》,载于《天津社会科学》2017年第3期。
(4)Chung-in Moon and Jongryn Mo,“Democracy and the Origins of the 1997 Korean Economic Crisis”,in Jongryn Mo and Chung-in Moon(eds.),Democracy and the Korean Economy,Stanford,CA:Hoover Institution Press,1998,pp.171-198.
(5)Moon and Rhyu,“The State,Structural Rigidity and The End of Asian Capitalism”,in Richard Robison,Mark Beeson,Kanishka Jayasuriya and Hyuk-Rae Kim(eds.),Politics and Markets in the Wake of the Asian Crisis,London:Routledge,2000,pp.77-98.
(6)Iain Pirie,“The New Korean State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.10,No.1,2005,pp.25-42;Kanishka Jayasuriya,“Beyond Institutional Fetishism:From the Developmental to the Regulatory State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.10,No.3,2005,pp.381-387.
(1)参见张振华、张彦华《去势的阶级:民主化与新自由主义情景下韩国劳工政治的嬗变》,载于《学海》2017年第2期。
(2)Sook-Jong Lee and Taejoon Han,“The Demise of‘Korea,Inc.’:Paradigm Shift in Korea’s Developmental State”,in Journal of Contemporary Asia,Vol.36,No.3,2006,pp.314-315.
(3)See Ronald Dore,Stock Market Capitalism:Welfare CapitalismJapan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons,New York:Oxford University Press,2000,Ch.4.
(4)Hyun-Chin Lim and Jin-Ho Jang,“Neo-liberalism in Postcrisis South Korea:Social Conditions and Outcomes”,in Journal of Contemporary Asia,Vol.36,No.4,2006,pp.442-463.
(5)Thomas Kalinowski and Hyekyung Cho,“The Political Economy of Financial Liberation in South Korea”,in Asian Survey,Vol.9,No.2,2009,pp.221-242.
(6)Thomas Kalinowski,“Korea’s Recovery Since the 1997/98Financial Crisis:The Last Stage of the Developmental State”,in New Political Economy,Vol.13,No.4,2008,pp.447-462.
(1)Elizabeth Thurbon and Linda Weiss,“Investing in Openness:the Evolution of FDI Strategy in South Korea and Taiwan”,in New Political Economy,Vol.11,No.1,2006,pp.1-22.
(2)Meredith Jung-En Woo,“After the Miracle:Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia”,in Meredith Jung-En Woo(eds.),Neoliberalism and Institutional Reform in East Asia,London:Palgrave Macmillan,2007,p.15.
(3)罗伯特·韦德(Robert Wade)区分了领导市场(leading the market)与追随市场(following the market)两种国家干预经济的方式,参见Robert Wade,Governing the Market:Economic Theory and The Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization,Princeton N.J.:Princeton University Press,1990,p.28.
(4)最为常见的情况是,总统所在的政党没能取得议会中的多数席位。
(5)See Ronald Mc Kinnon,The Order of Economic Liberalization:Financial Control in the Transition to a Market Economy,Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,1991.