两阶段生产系统下我国省际生态效率评价研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Evaluation on China's Interprovincial Eco-efficiency Under Two-stage Production System
  • 作者:王爱玲 ; 李雷鸣
  • 英文作者:Wang Ailing;Li Leiming;School of Economics & Management,China University of Petroleum;Institute of Organizational Mode Innovation, China University of Petroleum;
  • 关键词:两阶段生产系统 ; 共同前沿 ; 生态效率 ; 区域差异
  • 英文关键词:two-stage production system;;meta-frontier;;eco-efficiency;;regional difference
  • 中文刊名:TJJC
  • 英文刊名:Statistics & Decision
  • 机构:中国石油大学(华东)经济管理学院;中国石油大学(华东)组织模式创新研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-30 15:45
  • 出版单位:统计与决策
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.524
  • 基金:山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2016GQ06);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(17CX04017B)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TJJC201908023
  • 页数:5
  • CN:08
  • ISSN:42-1009/C
  • 分类号:95-99
摘要
文章将区域生态效率视为由资源转换和环境治理两个阶段串联构成的生产系统,应用环境生产技术和数据包络分析构建生态效率评价模型,在区域异质性视角下对我国2008—2015年27个省份生态效率进行评价研究,结果表明:考察期内我国大多数省份在不同前沿下资源转换效率均较高且差异不大,不同省份生态效率差异主要来源于环境治理效率;低排放区域在不同前沿下三大效率差距较小,但中高排放区域在不同前沿下三大效率差距较大,我国生态效率同类区域趋同特征显现。
        This paper regards the regional ecological efficiency as a tow-stage series-form production system composed of resource conversion and environmental management, and uses environmental production technology and data envelopment analysis(DEA) to build the eco-efficiency evaluation model, carrying out an evaluation research on the ecological efficiency of 27 provinces in China from 2008 to 2015 from the perspective of regional heterogeneity. The results show that during the study period, most provinces in China had high resource conversion efficiency with no significant differences under different frontiers, and the difference of ecological efficiency in different provinces mainly comes from the efficiency of environmental governance; the three efficiency gaps in the low-emission regions are small under different frontiers, but those in the medium-high emission regions are large under different frontiers, hence obvious convergence characteristics of ecological efficiency in regions of the same kind of China.
引文
[1]WBCSD. Eco-efficient Leadership for Improved Economic and Envi?ronmental Performance[M]. Geneva:WBCSD, 1996.
    [2]Dyckhoff H, Allen K. Measuring Ecological Efficiency with Data En?velopment Analysis(DEA):European Journal of Operational Re?search, 2001,(132).
    [3]程晓娟,韩庆兰,全春光.基于PCA-DEA组合模型的中国煤炭产业生态效率研究[J].资源科学,2013,35(6).
    [4]Casu B, Girardone C. Integration and Efficiency Convergence in EU Banking Markets[J]. Omega, 2010,(38).
    [5]孙源远,武春友.工业生态效率及评价研究综述[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,(11).
    [6]吴小庆,王远等.基于物质流分析的江苏省区域生态效率评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(10).
    [7]Picazo-Tadeo A J,et al. Assessing Eco-efficiency With Directional Distance Functions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2012,(220).
    [8]陈傲.中国区域生态效率评价及影响因素实证分析——以2000—2006年省际数据为例[J].中国管理科学,2008,10(16).
    [9]崔玮,苗建军,杨晶.基于碳排放约束的城市非农用地生态效率及影响因素分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(7).
    [10]付丽娜,陈晓红等.基于超效率DEA模型的城市群生态效率研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(4).
    [11]王恩旭,武春友.基于超效率DEA模型的中国省际生态效率时空差异研究[J].管理学报,2011,8(3).
    [12]邓波,张学军,郭军华.基于三阶段DEA模型的区域生态效率研究[J].中国软科学,2011,(1).
    [13]毕功兵,梁梁等.两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(2).

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700