论冯友兰的正的方法和负的方法及其关系
|
摘要
冯友兰先生的哲学方法论在20世纪中国哲学的发展进程中起到了极其重要的作用。他通过逻辑分析法对中国哲学进行解释,并将中国哲学生命体证的方法同西方的逻辑分析相结合。在此基础上他开始了对新理学方法的求证,提出了正的方法与负的方法的哲学方法论。正的方法就是对概念进行逻辑分析,运用概念思维去把握世界;负的方法则是通过直觉与体认去把握世界。这两种方法结合才是他所认为的哲学研究方法。冯友兰的哲学方法并不相互矛盾,而是一个从正到负的过程,负的方法不仅仅是对正的方法的补充,也是哲学方法的归宿。
Feng Youlan's philosophical methodology plays an extremely important role in the development of Chinese philosophy in the 20 th century. He explains Chinese philosophy through logic analysis and combined the embody of Chinese Philosophy with the logic of the West. On this basis, he begins to verify the new method of physics, and proposes the philosophical methodology of the positive method and the negative method. The positive method is to logically analyze concepts, and it uses conceptual thinking to grasp the world; the negative method is to grasp the world through intuition and recognition. The combination of these two methods is what he considers to be a philosophical research method. Feng Youlan's philosophical methods is not contradictory, but a process from positive to negative. The negative method is not only a supplement to the positive method, but also the destination of the philosophical method.
Feng Youlan's philosophical methodology plays an extremely important role in the development of Chinese philosophy in the 20 th century. He explains Chinese philosophy through logic analysis and combined the embody of Chinese Philosophy with the logic of the West. On this basis, he begins to verify the new method of physics, and proposes the philosophical methodology of the positive method and the negative method. The positive method is to logically analyze concepts, and it uses conceptual thinking to grasp the world; the negative method is to grasp the world through intuition and recognition. The combination of these two methods is what he considers to be a philosophical research method. Feng Youlan's philosophical methods is not contradictory, but a process from positive to negative. The negative method is not only a supplement to the positive method, but also the destination of the philosophical method.
引文
[1]冯友兰.三松堂全集:第四卷[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,2000.
[2]冯友兰.贞元六书[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996.
[3]冯友兰.中国哲学史[M].北京:中华书局,1961.
[4][古希腊]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[5]邓晓芒.黑格尔辩证法演讲录[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[6]冯友兰.三松堂全集:第五卷[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,2000.
[7]冯友兰.三松堂学术文集[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1984.
[8]冯友兰.中国哲学简史[M].涂又光,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
[9]冯友兰.冯友兰学术论著自选集[M].北京:北京师范学院出版社,1992.
[10]薛花.直觉主义的方法与形而上学“正的方法”[J].兰州学刊,2005,(5):69-71.
[2]冯友兰.贞元六书[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996.
[3]冯友兰.中国哲学史[M].北京:中华书局,1961.
[4][古希腊]亚里士多德.形而上学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[5]邓晓芒.黑格尔辩证法演讲录[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[6]冯友兰.三松堂全集:第五卷[M].郑州:河南人民出版社,2000.
[7]冯友兰.三松堂学术文集[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1984.
[8]冯友兰.中国哲学简史[M].涂又光,译.北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
[9]冯友兰.冯友兰学术论著自选集[M].北京:北京师范学院出版社,1992.
[10]薛花.直觉主义的方法与形而上学“正的方法”[J].兰州学刊,2005,(5):69-71.