摘要
由于史料的缺失,使学界对刘永福早期革命活动的研究产生了困扰,使这一时期许多史事无法立于可信的基础。现可利用已有的公牍档案资料、地方文史资料、方志和公私撰著为依据,通过"往投吴亚终"和"离开吴亚终"等方面史料进行详细的考证,以述其史事,考其真伪,探其因由,勾勒出1865—1867年间刘永福在追随吴亚终时期的革命活动。
Due to the lack of historical data,Liu Yongfu's early revolutionary activities were like a mystery.Although some works have disclosed part of the revolution process,many historical events in this period cannot be trusted because of insufficient data support.Now,on the basis of the existing official documents and archives,local literature and history materials,local chronicles,and public and private writings,through detailed textual research in such aspects as "following Wu Yazhong" and "leaving Wu Yazhong",this paper explains its history,examines its authenticity,and finds out the reasons for it,so as to outline the revolutionary activities during 1865-1867 when Liu Yongfu followed Wu Yazhong.
引文
[1] 论广西祸患之将来[N].大公报(天津),1902-11-03.
[2] 田汉.访冯子材墓[M]//田汉.田汉诗选.北京:人民文学出版社,1982:274.
[3] 平寇宜不分畛域說[N].申报,1878-12-13(4).
[4] 广西壮族自治区通志馆,广西壮族自治区图书馆编.清实录广西资料辑录:第4册[M].南宁:广西人民出版社,1988:366.
[5] 李健儿.刘永福传[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1970.
[6] 颜嗣徽.光绪归顺直隶州志:第5卷·纪事志[M].清光绪25年(1899)公体.桂林:桂林图书馆.
[7] 罗香林辑校.刘永福历史草[M].台北:正中书局,1936.
[8] 堂匪总录[M]//苏凤文.中国史学丛书续编20.台北:台湾学生书局,1972.
[9] 张卿云.征南辑略:卷2[M]//沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊三编·第43辑.台北:文海出版社,1966.
[10] 许文堂,谢奇懿.大南实录清越关系史料汇编[M].台北:中研院东南亚研究,2000:317.
① 在这年正月庚子(1871年2月28日)给军机大臣的上谕中,第一次提到刘永福,不过当时将其名写成“刘泳福”。具体内容见《穆宗实录》卷302:19-20.