景区边缘型乡村旅游地社会脆弱性评价与影响因素——以大南岳旅游圈为例
|
摘要
从敏感性和适应能力视角出发,构建景区边缘型乡村旅游地社会脆弱性评价指标体系。结果显示:(1)空间距离临近性对景区边缘型乡村旅游地敏感性产生了一定的扰动,但影响程度有限,大南岳旅游圈乡村旅游地社会脆弱性主要集中在核心景区的东部。(2)单一的季节性旅游自然景观或单一的文化景观开发是当前许多景区边缘型乡村旅游地发展存在的主要现象,这种开发模式不利于乡村旅游地的长久发展。(3)景观类型与核心区相同时无法有效吸引游客,而景观类型具有独特性时能有效吸引游客。(4)适应能力对社会脆弱性的影响程度高于敏感性对社会脆弱性的影响程度,旅游服务质量等8个指标对乡村旅游地社会脆弱性有着重要影响。
From the point of view of sensitivity and adaptability,the social vulnerability evaluation index system of the marginal rural tourist area was carried out.The results showed that:(1)Spatial distance proximity had a certain disturbance to the sensitivity of the marginal rural tourist areas in the scenic area,but the degree of influence was limited.The social vulnerability of rural tourism areas in the grand Nanyue tourism circle was mainly concentrated in the east of the core scenic area.(2)Single seasonal tourism natural landscape or single cultural landscape development was a phenomena existing in the development of marginal rural tourism sites in many scenic spots.It was not conducive to the long-term development of rural tourism.(3)It could effectively attract tourists when landscape types were full of its own uniqueness instead of the repetition of landscape types and core area.(4)The influence of adaptability on social vulnerability was higher than that of sensitivity on social vulnerability. Eight indicators,such as tourism service quality,had an important impact on the social vulnerability of rural tourism destinations.
From the point of view of sensitivity and adaptability,the social vulnerability evaluation index system of the marginal rural tourist area was carried out.The results showed that:(1)Spatial distance proximity had a certain disturbance to the sensitivity of the marginal rural tourist areas in the scenic area,but the degree of influence was limited.The social vulnerability of rural tourism areas in the grand Nanyue tourism circle was mainly concentrated in the east of the core scenic area.(2)Single seasonal tourism natural landscape or single cultural landscape development was a phenomena existing in the development of marginal rural tourism sites in many scenic spots.It was not conducive to the long-term development of rural tourism.(3)It could effectively attract tourists when landscape types were full of its own uniqueness instead of the repetition of landscape types and core area.(4)The influence of adaptability on social vulnerability was higher than that of sensitivity on social vulnerability. Eight indicators,such as tourism service quality,had an important impact on the social vulnerability of rural tourism destinations.
引文
[1]李伯华,刘沛林,窦银娣,等.景区边缘型乡村旅游地人居环境演变特征及影响机制研究:以大南岳旅游圈为例[J].地理科学,2014,34(11)∶1353-1360.
[2]李伯华,牛鑫,窦银娣,等.景区边缘型乡村旅游地资源开发潜力评价:以大南岳旅游圈为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(5)∶37-44.
[3]黄晓军,黄馨,崔彩兰.社会脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(11)∶1512-1525.
[4]何艳冰,黄晓军,翟令鑫.西安快速城市化边缘区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J].地理学报,2016,71(8)∶1315-1328.
[5]何艳冰,黄晓军,杨新军.西安城市边缘区失地农户社会脆弱性评价[J].经济地理,2017,37(4)∶149-157.
[6]王岩,方创琳.大庆市城市脆弱性综合评价与动态演变研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(5)∶547-555.
[7]刘凯,任建兰,程钰.黄河三角洲地区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J].经济地理,2016,36(7)∶45-52.
[8]苏飞,储毓婷,张平宇.我国典型旅游城市经济脆弱性及障碍因素分析[J].经济地理,2013,33(12)∶189-194.
[9]陈佳,杨新军,王子侨,等.乡村旅游社会—生态系统脆弱性及影响机理:基于秦岭景区农户调查数据的分析[J].旅游学刊,2015,30(3)∶64-75.
[10]谢盼,王仰麟,刘焱序,等.基于社会脆弱性的中国高温灾害人群健康风险评价[J].地理学报,2015,70(7)∶1041-1051.
[2]李伯华,牛鑫,窦银娣,等.景区边缘型乡村旅游地资源开发潜力评价:以大南岳旅游圈为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(5)∶37-44.
[3]黄晓军,黄馨,崔彩兰.社会脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(11)∶1512-1525.
[4]何艳冰,黄晓军,翟令鑫.西安快速城市化边缘区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J].地理学报,2016,71(8)∶1315-1328.
[5]何艳冰,黄晓军,杨新军.西安城市边缘区失地农户社会脆弱性评价[J].经济地理,2017,37(4)∶149-157.
[6]王岩,方创琳.大庆市城市脆弱性综合评价与动态演变研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(5)∶547-555.
[7]刘凯,任建兰,程钰.黄河三角洲地区社会脆弱性评价与影响因素[J].经济地理,2016,36(7)∶45-52.
[8]苏飞,储毓婷,张平宇.我国典型旅游城市经济脆弱性及障碍因素分析[J].经济地理,2013,33(12)∶189-194.
[9]陈佳,杨新军,王子侨,等.乡村旅游社会—生态系统脆弱性及影响机理:基于秦岭景区农户调查数据的分析[J].旅游学刊,2015,30(3)∶64-75.
[10]谢盼,王仰麟,刘焱序,等.基于社会脆弱性的中国高温灾害人群健康风险评价[J].地理学报,2015,70(7)∶1041-1051.