综合护理干预在新生儿肺炎治疗中的应用价值分析
|
摘要
目的探析综合护理干预在新生儿肺炎治疗中的临床应用价值。方法选取我院2015年1月~2018年12月新生儿科收治的80例肺炎患儿,随机分为采用全面护理干预的观察组和采用常规护理干预的对照组两组,每组各40例。比较两组新生儿肺炎患儿的临床症状改善时间、住院时间及治疗效果。结果观察组新生儿肺炎患儿在咳嗽时间、退热时间、肺部啰音消失时间及住院时间均小于对照组,比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组新生儿肺炎患儿的治疗总有效率97.5%高于对照组的80.0%,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预能提升新生儿肺炎患儿的治疗效果,并改善临床症状。
Objective To explore the clinical application value of comprehensive nursing intervention in the treatment of neonatal pneumonia. Methods Eighty children with pneumonia admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were randomly divided into observation group with comprehensive nursing intervention and control group with routine nursing intervention, 40 patients in each group. The clinical symptom improvement time, hospitalization time and treatment effect of children with neonatal pneumonia were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, children with neonatal pneumonia had lower cough time,fever time, lung voice disappearance time and hospital stay than the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The total effective rate of treatment was 97.5% higher than that of the control group(80.0%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the therapeutic effect of children with neonatal pneumonia and improve clinical symptoms.
Objective To explore the clinical application value of comprehensive nursing intervention in the treatment of neonatal pneumonia. Methods Eighty children with pneumonia admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2018 were randomly divided into observation group with comprehensive nursing intervention and control group with routine nursing intervention, 40 patients in each group. The clinical symptom improvement time, hospitalization time and treatment effect of children with neonatal pneumonia were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, children with neonatal pneumonia had lower cough time,fever time, lung voice disappearance time and hospital stay than the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).The total effective rate of treatment was 97.5% higher than that of the control group(80.0%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the therapeutic effect of children with neonatal pneumonia and improve clinical symptoms.
引文
[1]柯欢,殷苑琴,肖云红,等.转变体位护理对新生儿肺炎患儿的影响[J].护理学杂志,2017,32(21):43-45.
[2]汤菊妹,王绍娟.集束化护理在新生儿肺炎雾化吸入治疗中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(12):92-93.
[3]DukeT.Neonatalpneumoniaindevelopingcountries[J].ArchivesofDiseasein Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition,2005,90(3):F211-f219.
[4]Black R E,Morris S S,Bryce J.Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?[J].Lancet,2003,361(9376):2226-34.
[5]Dickson K E,Chopra M.Reducing neonatal mortality in resource poor settings[J].BMJ,2012,344:e2197.
[6]肖玉,刘翠,李兴霞.转变体位护理在新生儿肺炎患儿中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(10):32-33.
[7]邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
[8]Nair N S,Lewis L E,Murthy S,et al.Treatment options and barriers to case management of neonatal pneumonia in India:A protocol for a scoping review[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(9):e017617.
[9]Zhang P,Cui T T,Zhang Z H,et al.Low-dose vitamin a therapy on Tlymphocyte function in neonatal pneumonia[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2018,22(13):4371-4374.
[10]Vishnu B B,Adhisivam B.Can we reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy for neonatal pneumonia?[J].Indian J Pediatr,2018,85(11):952-953.
[11]Nair S,Lewis L E,Godinho M Aet al.Factors associated with neonatal pneumonia in India:Protocol for a systematic review and planned metaanalysis[J].BMJ Open,2018,8(1):e018790.
[12]Misra S,Bhakoo O N,Ayyagiri A,et al.Clinical&Bacteriological profile of neonatal pneumonia[J].Indian J Med Res,1991,93:366-70.
[13]Nair N S,Lewis L E,Lakiang T,et al.Risk factors and barriers to case management of neonatal pneumonia:Protocol for a pan-India qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(9):e017403.
[2]汤菊妹,王绍娟.集束化护理在新生儿肺炎雾化吸入治疗中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2016,13(12):92-93.
[3]DukeT.Neonatalpneumoniaindevelopingcountries[J].ArchivesofDiseasein Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition,2005,90(3):F211-f219.
[4]Black R E,Morris S S,Bryce J.Where and why are 10 million children dying every year?[J].Lancet,2003,361(9376):2226-34.
[5]Dickson K E,Chopra M.Reducing neonatal mortality in resource poor settings[J].BMJ,2012,344:e2197.
[6]肖玉,刘翠,李兴霞.转变体位护理在新生儿肺炎患儿中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2018,24(10):32-33.
[7]邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.
[8]Nair N S,Lewis L E,Murthy S,et al.Treatment options and barriers to case management of neonatal pneumonia in India:A protocol for a scoping review[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(9):e017617.
[9]Zhang P,Cui T T,Zhang Z H,et al.Low-dose vitamin a therapy on Tlymphocyte function in neonatal pneumonia[J].Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2018,22(13):4371-4374.
[10]Vishnu B B,Adhisivam B.Can we reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy for neonatal pneumonia?[J].Indian J Pediatr,2018,85(11):952-953.
[11]Nair S,Lewis L E,Godinho M Aet al.Factors associated with neonatal pneumonia in India:Protocol for a systematic review and planned metaanalysis[J].BMJ Open,2018,8(1):e018790.
[12]Misra S,Bhakoo O N,Ayyagiri A,et al.Clinical&Bacteriological profile of neonatal pneumonia[J].Indian J Med Res,1991,93:366-70.
[13]Nair N S,Lewis L E,Lakiang T,et al.Risk factors and barriers to case management of neonatal pneumonia:Protocol for a pan-India qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions[J].BMJ Open,2017,7(9):e017403.