经颅多普勒超声联合颈动脉超声对颈动脉狭窄支架治疗的临床价值分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of Clinical Value of Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography and Carotid Ultrasound in the Treatment of Carotid Artery Stenosis
  • 作者:吕娜
  • 英文作者:LYU Na;Department of Health and Management, Mudan People's Hospital,Heze, Shandong Province;
  • 关键词:经颅多普勒超声 ; 颈动脉狭窄支架 ; 颈动脉超声
  • 英文关键词:Transcranial Doppler ultrasound;;Carotid stenosis stent;;Carotid artery ultrasound
  • 中文刊名:XTYX
  • 英文刊名:Systems Medicine
  • 机构:山东省菏泽市牡丹人民医院健康管理部;
  • 出版日期:2018-03-20
  • 出版单位:系统医学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.3;No.42
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XTYX201806035
  • 页数:3
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:10-1369/R
  • 分类号:99-101
摘要
目的分析颈动脉超声和经颅多普勒超声联合对颈动脉狭窄支架的临床应用效果。方法选择该院2016年1—12月共计100例实行颈动脉狭窄支架的患者,使用经颅多普勒超声联合颈动脉超声的检测方式等检测患者的颈动脉狭窄局部管径,狭窄段收缩期峰值流速,搏动指数等相关指标,观察其测量效果。结果颈动脉狭窄患者实行颈动脉支架植入术后原来狭窄部位的局部管径从(3.24±0.75)mm逐渐增加为手术之后1周左右的(5.14±1.15)mm,治疗前后差异有统计学意义(t=5.152,P<0.05)。其他指标治疗前后亦差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于颈动脉支架术后的患者来说,使用经颅多普勒超声检测联合颈动脉超声检测的方式能够表明患者血管内径和脑部血流动力学的改善情况优异,颈动脉超声和经颅多普勒超声联合可以作为颈动脉支架植入术疗效评价的重要手段。
        Objective To analyze the clinical effect of carotid artery ultrasound and transcranial Doppler ultrasound on carotid artery stenosis. Methods A total of 100 cases of carotid artery stenosis stent in our hospital from January to December 2016 year, and the local diameter of carotid artery stenosis, peak systolic peak velocity in narrow section and pulsatility index of patients was tested by the carotid artery ultrasound and transcranial Doppler ultrasound, and the measurement effect was observed. Results After the carotid artery stent implantation, the local diameter of carotid artery stenosis increased from(3.24±0.75)mm to(5.14±1.15)mm in 1 week after operation, and the difference before and after treatment was significant(t=5.152,P<0.05). There were significant differences in other indexes before and after treatment(P<0.05) Conclusion For patients after carotid artery stenting, the transcranial Doppler detection combined with carotid artery ultrasonography can show the improvement of brain hemodynamics in patients with vascular diameter is excellent, and the carotid artery ultrasound and transcranial Doppler ultrasound can used as a major means in evaluating the curative effect of carotid artery stenting.
引文
[1]陈胜江,尚智伟,曲智峰,等.症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术患者不同疗效的术前超声指标分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2018(2):122-125.
    [2]阿力木吾甫尔,韩登峰,哈力旦·加马力丁,等.颅内侧枝循环开放程度与颈动脉支架置入术后短期预后的关系[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2018(2):186-189,193.
    [3]徐保庆,曹春光,谢方民,等.Solitaire AB支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤的临床研究[J].泰山医学院学报,2018(2):156-159.
    [4]陈兴河,冯三平,赵锦程,等.双LVIS支架辅助栓塞治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤临床研究[J].河北医药,2018,40(2):251-254.
    [5]王子亮,许岗勤,白卫星,等.颈动脉支架成形术后颅内出血临床分析[J].介入放射学杂志,2017,26(12):1068-1072.
    [6]刘南暖,周发明,郑永强,等.颈内动脉支架植入术后出血的临床分析[J].湖北医药学院学报,2017,36(6):529-531.
    [7]吴志强,李润雄,罗根培,等.重度颈动脉狭窄支架植入术远期效果评价[J].实用医学杂志,2017,33(24):4102-4104.
    [8]祖力飞亚·阿勒滕别克.数字化超声经颅多普勒血流分析仪对颈动脉重度狭窄及对颈动脉支架植入术前后血流改变的应用[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2016.
    [9]王洪科.颈动脉超声和经颅多普勒超声联合评价颈动脉狭窄支架治疗的临床价值[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2014.
    [10]王洪科,张小宁,刘培琴,等.颈动脉超声和经颅多普勒超声联合评价颈动脉狭窄支架治疗的临床价值[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2014,40(1):31-34.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700