财政补助、外部融资与企业自主研发投入——基于2016年全国企业调查数据
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Financial Aid, External Financing and Enterprise Independent R&D Investment——Based on the Survey Data of National Association in 2016
  • 作者:林小玲
  • 英文作者:LIN Xiao-ling;School of Economics,Shenzhen University;
  • 关键词:财政补助 ; 外部融资 ; 自主研发投入 ; 长期借贷 ; 调节效应
  • 英文关键词:financial subsidy;;external financing;;independent R&D investment;;long-term borrowing;;moderating effect
  • 中文刊名:SXCJ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
  • 机构:深圳大学经济学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-18 09:30
  • 出版单位:山西财经大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41;No.319
  • 基金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(14JJD790041
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SXCJ201905006
  • 页数:13
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:14-1221/F
  • 分类号:73-85
摘要
采用2016年全国企业调查数据分析了财政补助对企业自主研发投入的影响,并且检验了长期信贷、股权融资的中介效应与调节效应。结果发现,财政补助增加了长期信贷、股权融资和企业研发投入,其对东部企业的研发激励效应比中西部企业更显著,对非战略性新兴产业的研发激励效应比战略性新兴产业更显著,对国有企业、私有企业、外资企业的研发激励效应依次减弱,对小微企业的研发激励效应比大中型企业更显著。
        Based on the survey data of national association in 2016, we made a research on the effect of financial aid on enterprise independent R&D investment, and tested the mesomeric effect and moderating effect of long-term credit and equity financing.Then we know that financial subsidies have attracted more long-term credit and equity financing into enterprise R&D, which is more obvious in eastern enterprises than that in Midwestern enterprises.And financial subsidies have stimulated non-strategic emerging industries more strongly than strategic emerging industries. Moreover, the incentive effect of financial subsidies reveals a declining tendency among state-owned enterprises, private enterprises and foreign-funded enterprises in turn, and it is more effective in micro and small enterprises than that in large and medium-sized enterprises.
引文
[1]Tassey G.Competing in Advanced Manufacturing:The Need for Improved Growth Models and Policies[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,2014,28(1):27-48.
    [2]Gorodnichenko Y,Schnitzer M.Financial Constraints Innovation:Why Poor Countries Don't Catch Up[J].Journal of the European Economic Association,2013,11(5):1115-1152.
    [3]Martin S,Scott J T.The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation[J].Cie Discussion Papers,2000,29(4-5):437-447.
    [4]Becker B.Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment:A Survey of the Empirical Evidence[J].Journal of Economic Surveys,2015,29(5):917-942.
    [5]王明海,李小静.政府干预、外部投资与企业自主创新——基于信号传递视角的研究[J].上海经济研究,2017(2):9-16.
    [6]Filipe Silva,Carlos Carreira.Do Financial Constraints Threat the Innovation Process?Evidence from Portuguese Firms[J].Gemf Working Papers,2012,21(8):701-736.
    [7]熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆出版社,1991.
    [8]Song Z,Storesletten K,Zilibotti F.Growing(with Capital Controls)like China[J].IMF Economic Review,2014,62(3):327-370.
    [9]Hans L觟觟f.Additionality or Crowding Out On the Effectiveness of R&D Subsidies[R].New York:Working Paper,2004.
    [10]Lopesbento C.Innovation Subsidies:Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance?Empirical Evidence from Germany[J].Industry&Innovation,2014,21(5):380-409.
    [11]张凯,林小玲.财政分权、金融发展与全要素生产率提升[J].经济与管理评论,2019,210(1):13-23.
    [12]Blanes J V,Busom I.Who Participates in R&D Subsidy Programs?The Case of Spanish Manufacturing Firms[J].Research Policy,2004,33(10):1459-1476.
    [13]郑妍妍,戴晓慧,魏倩.融资约束与企业研发投资——来自中国工业企业的微观证据[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(5):58-66.
    [14]孙晓华,郭旭,王昀.政府补贴、所有权性质与企业研发决策[J].管理科学学报,2017,20(6):18-31.
    [15]Koski H,Tuuli J.Business Subsidies in Finland:The Dynamics of Application and Acceptance Stages[R].ETLA Discussion Papers,2010:3-11.
    [16]Kleer R.Government R&D Subsidies as a Signal for Private Investors[J].Research Policy,2010,39(10):1361-1374.
    [17]李新功.政府R&D资助、金融信贷与企业技术创新[J].管理评论,2016,28(12):54-62.
    [18]赵璨,王竹泉,杨德明等.企业迎合行为与政府补贴绩效研究——基于企业不同盈利状况的分析[J].中国工业经济,2015(7):130-145.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700