《古文苑》成书新考——兼与王晓鹃教授商榷
|
摘要
《古文苑》最早著录于郑樵《通志》,南宋多认为是北宋学者孙洙在佛寺中发现的唐人旧编,而后世多认为是由宋人抄撮类书等文献而成。《古文苑》并非一次性编成的静态文本,它有一个连续不断的增补修订过程,其中保存的大量珍稀文献当属唐人旧稿,而3篇石刻文则是宋人在嘉祐年以后新增入的。将《古文苑》的文本分为原始文本和新附文本,有利于更清楚地认识《古文苑》的成书过程。
Guwenyuanis first recorded in Tong Zhi by Zheng Qiao,and most scholars of the Southern Song Dynasty consider it to be the old record of the Tang Dynasty found in a Buddhist temple by Sun Zhu,a scholar of the Northern Song Dynasty.However,the later scholars tend to believe that it is not compiled in the Tang Dynasty,but is copied by scholars of the Song Dynasty from other books.Guwenyuanis not a static text compiled at one go,but is continually supplemented.The many rare texts in it are the original record of the Tang Dynasty while the three stone inscriptions are the supplements of the Song Dynasty.To understand the compilation of Guwenyuan,it is advisable to divide its texts into the original and the supplementary.
Guwenyuanis first recorded in Tong Zhi by Zheng Qiao,and most scholars of the Southern Song Dynasty consider it to be the old record of the Tang Dynasty found in a Buddhist temple by Sun Zhu,a scholar of the Northern Song Dynasty.However,the later scholars tend to believe that it is not compiled in the Tang Dynasty,but is copied by scholars of the Song Dynasty from other books.Guwenyuanis not a static text compiled at one go,but is continually supplemented.The many rare texts in it are the original record of the Tang Dynasty while the three stone inscriptions are the supplements of the Song Dynasty.To understand the compilation of Guwenyuan,it is advisable to divide its texts into the original and the supplementary.
引文
[1]王晓鹃.《古文苑》论稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2010.
[2]陈思.宝刻丛编[M]//新文丰出版社编辑部.丛书集成新编:第51册.台北:新文丰出版公司,1985:458.
[3]孙月霞.晁公武《郡斋读书志》研究[D].保定:河北大学,2011.
[4]王晓鹃.《古文苑》研究[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2008.
[5]范邦甸.天一阁书目[M]//《续修四库全书》编委会.续修四库全书:第920册.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:272.
[6]吴平.《天一阁书目》初探[J].广东图书馆学刊,1989(3):9-10.
[7]晁公武.郡斋读书志校证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:1057.
[8]王晓鹃.《古文苑》编纂者新考[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2009(5):113-119.
[9]顾广圻.顾千里集[M].北京:中华书局,2007:123-124.
(1)孙洙(1031-1079),字巨源,北宋文人,曾长期任职馆阁。此说见于《古文苑》南宋淳熙六年(1179)韩元吉刻本卷尾跋文。
(2)此本原刻不存,后世有较多复刻本,其中《四部丛刊》影印明成化刻本较为流行。
(3)此处应为顺伯,系《天一阁书目》编者笔误。
(4)1.王著的数据为二十一卷本数据,九卷本数据系笔者分别减去章樵增加的篇数所得,从而更能看出《古文苑》原本的文献来源。2.“字数少于类书”原统计为19,因其中所含张衡《羽猎赋》一篇为二十一卷本脱去,故应为18。3.“见于类书之外、南宋初及之前的其他文献”原统计为52,王著于页下注“章樵增入无名氏《楚相孙叔敖碑》,见《隶释》卷三”,《隶释》也属于南宋初著作,则应为53。
[2]陈思.宝刻丛编[M]//新文丰出版社编辑部.丛书集成新编:第51册.台北:新文丰出版公司,1985:458.
[3]孙月霞.晁公武《郡斋读书志》研究[D].保定:河北大学,2011.
[4]王晓鹃.《古文苑》研究[D].兰州:西北师范大学,2008.
[5]范邦甸.天一阁书目[M]//《续修四库全书》编委会.续修四库全书:第920册.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:272.
[6]吴平.《天一阁书目》初探[J].广东图书馆学刊,1989(3):9-10.
[7]晁公武.郡斋读书志校证[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1990:1057.
[8]王晓鹃.《古文苑》编纂者新考[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2009(5):113-119.
[9]顾广圻.顾千里集[M].北京:中华书局,2007:123-124.
(1)孙洙(1031-1079),字巨源,北宋文人,曾长期任职馆阁。此说见于《古文苑》南宋淳熙六年(1179)韩元吉刻本卷尾跋文。
(2)此本原刻不存,后世有较多复刻本,其中《四部丛刊》影印明成化刻本较为流行。
(3)此处应为顺伯,系《天一阁书目》编者笔误。
(4)1.王著的数据为二十一卷本数据,九卷本数据系笔者分别减去章樵增加的篇数所得,从而更能看出《古文苑》原本的文献来源。2.“字数少于类书”原统计为19,因其中所含张衡《羽猎赋》一篇为二十一卷本脱去,故应为18。3.“见于类书之外、南宋初及之前的其他文献”原统计为52,王著于页下注“章樵增入无名氏《楚相孙叔敖碑》,见《隶释》卷三”,《隶释》也属于南宋初著作,则应为53。