除草剂和地膜覆盖对甘薯杂草防控的影响
|
摘要
采用大田试验方法,研究不同除草剂和地膜覆盖对甘薯田间杂草防控的影响。结果表明,T3处理(50%乙草胺乳油、黑膜)杂草株防效和鲜质量防效最好,T1处理(33%二甲戊乐灵乳油、黑膜)和T4处理(33%二甲戊乐灵乳油、透明膜)显著低于其他处理,33%二甲戊乐灵乳油除草效果不佳;T5处理(96%精异丙甲草胺乳油、透明膜)鲜薯产量、薯干产量及商品薯率最高,除草剂与地膜覆盖对甘薯产量形成因素有极显著的互作效应。生产上应选用96%精异丙甲草胺乳油配套透明膜使用较为适宜。
The field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different herbicides and plastic film mulching on the weeds control of sweet potato. The results showed that the T3 treatment(50% acetochlor, black membrane)had the best control effect on weed plants and fresh quality, the T1 treatment(33% pendimethalin EC, black membrane)and T4 treatment(33% pendimethalin EC,transparent membrane)were significantly lower than other treatments,33% pendimethalin EC was not effective in weeding. The yield of fresh sweet potato, the yield of dried sweet potato and the rate of commercial potato of T5 treatment(96% methoprolopamide EC,transparent membrane) were the highest, herbicide and film mulching had an extremely significant cross interaction on the yield formation factors of sweet potato of T5. The treatment of 96% methoprolopamide EC, black film is more suitable for production.
The field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different herbicides and plastic film mulching on the weeds control of sweet potato. The results showed that the T3 treatment(50% acetochlor, black membrane)had the best control effect on weed plants and fresh quality, the T1 treatment(33% pendimethalin EC, black membrane)and T4 treatment(33% pendimethalin EC,transparent membrane)were significantly lower than other treatments,33% pendimethalin EC was not effective in weeding. The yield of fresh sweet potato, the yield of dried sweet potato and the rate of commercial potato of T5 treatment(96% methoprolopamide EC,transparent membrane) were the highest, herbicide and film mulching had an extremely significant cross interaction on the yield formation factors of sweet potato of T5. The treatment of 96% methoprolopamide EC, black film is more suitable for production.
引文
[1]唐忠厚,魏猛,陈晓光,等.不同肉色甘薯块根主要营养品质特征与综合评价[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(9):1705-1714.
[2]刘亚军,储凤丽,王文静,等.扦插方式对甘薯结薯习性和商品薯率的影响[J].山西农业科学,2018,46(7):1132-1134.
[3]陆建珍,汪翔,秦建军,等.我国甘薯种植业发展状况调查报告(2017年):基于国家甘薯产业技术体系产业经济固定观察点数据的分析[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(23):393-398.
[4]马代夫,李强,曹清河,等.中国甘薯产业及产业技术的发展与展望[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(5):969-973.
[5]李贵,王一专,吴竞仑.甘薯田杂草的防除策略[J].杂草科学,2010,28(4):15-18.
[6]张勇,刘震,路兴涛,等.山东省泰安市甘薯田杂草调查[J].杂草科学,2012,30(2):43-45.
[7]段成鼎,范建芝,杨淑娟,等. 3种除草剂对甘薯田杂草的田间防效试验[J].杂草科学,2014,32(2):52-55.
[8]辛国胜,林祖军,韩俊杰,等.黑色地膜对甘薯生理特性及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(15):233-237.
[9]邱思鑫,刘中华,余华,等.甘薯田间杂草安全高效除草剂的筛选[J].福建农业学报,2018,33(2):171-176.
[10]井水华.鲁南丘陵旱薄地甘薯高产高效栽培技术研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2016.
[11]储凤丽,王文静,胡启国,等.商薯19化学除草和地膜覆盖配套栽培效应探讨[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(8):117-119,127.
[12]胡启国,王文静,储凤丽,等.甘薯田间杂草高效除草剂筛选试验[J].山西农业科学,2013,41(7):735-737.
[13]孙厚俊,杨冬静,徐振,等.徐淮地区甘薯田主要杂草种类及防除技术[J].江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(4):24-26.
[14]杨育峰,李君霞,代小冬,等. 5种除草剂对甘薯田间杂草的防除效果[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(7):88-90.
[15]范建芝,段成鼎,井水华,等.除草剂配合地膜覆盖对甘薯田杂草防除及增产的效果[J].杂草学报,2016,34(1):61-64.
[2]刘亚军,储凤丽,王文静,等.扦插方式对甘薯结薯习性和商品薯率的影响[J].山西农业科学,2018,46(7):1132-1134.
[3]陆建珍,汪翔,秦建军,等.我国甘薯种植业发展状况调查报告(2017年):基于国家甘薯产业技术体系产业经济固定观察点数据的分析[J].江苏农业科学,2018,46(23):393-398.
[4]马代夫,李强,曹清河,等.中国甘薯产业及产业技术的发展与展望[J].江苏农业学报,2012,28(5):969-973.
[5]李贵,王一专,吴竞仑.甘薯田杂草的防除策略[J].杂草科学,2010,28(4):15-18.
[6]张勇,刘震,路兴涛,等.山东省泰安市甘薯田杂草调查[J].杂草科学,2012,30(2):43-45.
[7]段成鼎,范建芝,杨淑娟,等. 3种除草剂对甘薯田杂草的田间防效试验[J].杂草科学,2014,32(2):52-55.
[8]辛国胜,林祖军,韩俊杰,等.黑色地膜对甘薯生理特性及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(15):233-237.
[9]邱思鑫,刘中华,余华,等.甘薯田间杂草安全高效除草剂的筛选[J].福建农业学报,2018,33(2):171-176.
[10]井水华.鲁南丘陵旱薄地甘薯高产高效栽培技术研究[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2016.
[11]储凤丽,王文静,胡启国,等.商薯19化学除草和地膜覆盖配套栽培效应探讨[J].山东农业科学,2016,48(8):117-119,127.
[12]胡启国,王文静,储凤丽,等.甘薯田间杂草高效除草剂筛选试验[J].山西农业科学,2013,41(7):735-737.
[13]孙厚俊,杨冬静,徐振,等.徐淮地区甘薯田主要杂草种类及防除技术[J].江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(4):24-26.
[14]杨育峰,李君霞,代小冬,等. 5种除草剂对甘薯田间杂草的防除效果[J].河南农业科学,2013,42(7):88-90.
[15]范建芝,段成鼎,井水华,等.除草剂配合地膜覆盖对甘薯田杂草防除及增产的效果[J].杂草学报,2016,34(1):61-64.