中国人造板行业的生命周期碳足迹和能源耗用评估
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Carbon footprint and energy consumption based on life cycle assessment of wood-based panel industry in China
  • 作者:王珊珊 ; 张寒 ; 杨红强
  • 英文作者:WANG Shanshan;ZHANG Han;YANG Hongqiang;College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University;Research Center for Economics and Trade in Forest Products,SFA;Department of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University;Center for the Yangtze River Delta's Socioeconomic Development, Nanjing University;
  • 关键词:人造板行业 ; 生命周期分析 ; ISO ; 14067 ; 温室气体 ; 碳足迹 ; 能源耗用 ; 中国
  • 英文关键词:wood-based panel industry;;life cycle assessment;;ISO 14067;;greenhouse gas emissions;;carbon footprint;;energy consumption;;China
  • 中文刊名:ZRZY
  • 英文刊名:Resources Science
  • 机构:南京林业大学经济管理学院;国家林业局林产品经济贸易研究中心;西北农林科技大学经济管理学院;南京大学长江三角洲经济社会发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:资源科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.41
  • 基金:江苏省“333高层次人才工程”科研项目(BRA2018070);; 国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AJY014);; 江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX18_0974)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZRZY201903011
  • 页数:11
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:11-3868/N
  • 分类号:109-119
摘要
降低温室气体排放是应对气候变化的重要措施,基于生命周期分析的碳足迹评估被广泛应用于量化产品的温室气体排放。在减排承诺背景下,林业部门在应对气候变化中具有重要贡献。中国作为世界最大的人造板生产和出口国,人造板行业的碳足迹和能源耗用问题,是评价林业产业环境影响的重要领域。本文依据ISO 14067标准,测度了中国胶合板、纤维板和刨花板行业"从摇篮到大门"系统界限的碳足迹,通过对比国内外人造板行业的能源耗用,评估了中国人造板行业的节能潜力,结合量化改进方案的减排效果,提出了人造板行业减排和市场结构改善的建议措施。研究发现:①中国现有人造板行业的碳足迹结构中,纤维板最大(708.74 kg CO_2e),胶合板最小(312.08 kg CO_2e),刨花板居中(410.79 kg CO_2e)。其中原材料获取对碳足迹贡献最大,化工材料如脲醛树脂胶的生产和使用是最主要的温室气体排放源;②对标国际标准和技术进步要求,中国人造板行业的能源耗用可减少13.27%~47.99%;③用木质燃料替代化石能源,对人造板行业的温室气体减排可实现11.53%~42.30%的提升空间。
        Reducing greenhouse gas emissions(GHG) is an important measure to cope with climate change. Carbon footprint(CF) analysis is widely used to quantify greenhouse gas emissions of a product during its life cycle. Given that China has committed to decreasing its carbon dioxide(CO_2) emissions, the forestry sector has to make important contributions in this effort to mitigate climate change. China has become the largest wood-based panel producer and exporter worldwide. As the pillar of the forestry industry, evaluating carbon footprint and energy consumption of the wood-based panel industry is a vital part of environmental analysis of the forestry industry. Based on the ISO 14067 standard, this study quantified the carbon footprint of plywood, fiberboard and particleboard in China using a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment approach. This study also evaluated the energy-saving potential of the wood-based panel industry in China by comparing the energy consumption in China and internationally. Finally, combined with the quantitative reduction effect of the improvement scheme, suggestions for reducing emissions and optimizing the market structure of the wood-based panel industry were provided.The results of this study show that fiberboard manufacturing produced the largest contributions to the emissions of greenhouse gases(708.74 kg CO_2e), followed by particleboard(410.79 kg CO_2e)and plywood(312.08 kg CO_2e). During the life cycle, the raw material acquisition subsystem had the greatest impact on carbon footprint. The production and use of chemicals such as the ureaformaldehyde resin were the main sources of greenhouse gas emissions. The energy consumption of China's wood-based panel industry was higher than the requirements of international standards and could be reduced by 13.27% ~47.99%. China's wood-based panel industry could potentially contribute to climate change mitigation in the future. In particular, as a substitute for fossil energy,using wood fuels could reduce the emission of greenhouse gases by 11.53%~42.30%.
引文
[1] An J, Xue X. Life cycle carbon footprint analysis of magnesia products[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 119:4-11.
    [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). 2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol[R]. Geneva:IPCC, 2014.
    [3] Pan Y D, Birdsey R A, Fang J Y, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):988-993.
    [4] Sathre R, O’Connor J. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution[J]. Environmental Sci?ence and Policy, 2010, 13(2):104-114.
    [5] Kutnar A, Hill C. Assessment of Carbon Foot Printing in the Wood Industry[A]. Muthu S. Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors[M]. Singapore:Springer, 2014.
    [6]张小标,杨红强.基于GFPM的中国林产品碳储效能及碳库结构动态预测[J].资源科学, 2015, 37(7):1403-1413.[Zhang X B,Yong H Q. Dynamic projection of storage efficiency and carbon pool structure of China’s harvested wood products based on GFPM[J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(7):1403-1413.]
    [7]陈家新,杨红强.全球森林及林产品碳科学研究进展与前瞻[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):1-7.[Chen J X, Yang H Q. The advances and frontiers in global forest and harvested wood products carbon science[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forest?ry University(Nature Sciences), 2018, 42(4):1-7.]
    [8] International Organization for Standardization(ISO). ISO 14040:Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment:Principles and Framework[R]. Geneva:ISO, 2006.
    [9] González-García S, Feijoo G, Widsten P, et al. Environmental performance assessment of hardboard manufacture[J]. Internation?al Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14(5):456-466.
    [10]刘韵,师华定,曾贤刚.基于全生命周期评价的电力企业碳足迹评估:以山西省吕梁市某燃煤电厂为例[J].资源科学, 2011,33(4):653-658.[Liu Y, Shi H D, Zeng X G. A life-cycle carbon footprint assessment of electric power companies[J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(4):653-658.]
    [11] Martínez-Alonso C, Berdasco L. Carbon footprint of sawn timber products of Castanea sativa, Mill. in the north of Spain[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102(9):127-135.
    [12] Laurent A, Olsen S I, Hauschild M Z. Carbon footprint as environmental performance indicator for the manufacturing industry[J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 59(1):37-40.
    [13] Komata H, Kato Y, Takayama M, et al. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and problems of the methods for the production of lumber, glued laminated timber and plywood[J]. Journal of the Hokkaido Forest Products Research Institute, 2010, 539:1-5.
    [14] Wilson J B. Life-cycle inventory of medium density fiberboard in terms of resources, emissions, energy and carbon[J]. Wood and Fiber Science, 2010, 42(5):107-124.
    [15] Wilson J B. Life-cycle inventory of particleboard in terms of resources, emissions, energy and carbon[J]. Wood and Fiber Science,2010, 42(5):90-106.
    [16] Garcia R, Freire F. Carbon footprint of particleboard:A comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG protocol, PAS 2050 and climate declaration[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 66(2):199-209.
    [17] Hussain M, Naseem M R, Taylor A. Carbon footprint as an environmental sustainability indicator for the particleboard produced in Pakistan[J]. Environmental Research, 2017, 155:385-393.
    [18] Newell J P, Vos R O. Accounting for forest carbon pool dynamics in product carbon footprints:Challenges and opportunities[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2012, 37(4):23-36.
    [19]陈莎,杨孝光,李燚佩,等.中国纸产品全生命周期GHG排放分析[J].北京工业大学学报, 2014, 40(6):944-949.[Chen S,Yang X G, Li Y P, et al. Life cycle GHG emissions of paper in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2014, 40(6):944-949.]
    [20] Tahara K, Shimizu H, Nakazawa K, et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of e-books vs. paper books:A Japanese case study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 189:59-66.
    [21] González-García S, Gasol C M, Lozano R G, et al. Assessing the global warming potential of wooden products from the furniture sector to improve their ecodesign[J]. Science of the Total Environ?ment, 2011, 410-411:16-25.
    [22] Liu M, Li G Y. Carbon footprint assessment methods of wood furniture based on LCA[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014,912-914:1600-1602.
    [23] Linkosalmi L, Husgafvel R, Fomkin A, et al. Main factors influencing greenhouse gas emissions of wood-based furniture industry in Finland[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 113:596-605.
    [24]陈硕,胡继梅,沈乃强,等.强化木地板的“碳足迹”计算分析[J].木材工业, 2014, 28(2):36-38.[Chen S, Hu J M, Shen N Q,et al.“Carbon footprint”calculation and analysis for laminate flooring[J]. China Wood Industry, 2014, 28(2):36-38.]
    [25] Takano A, Pittau F, Hafner A, et al. Greenhouse gas emission from construction stage of wooden buildings[J]. Journal of the In?stitute of Wood Science, 2014, 5(4):217-223.
    [26] Chang Y S, Kim S, Son W L, et al. Evaluation of greenhouse gas emission for wooden house using simplified life cycle assessment tool[J]. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology,2017, 45(5):650-660.
    [27]中华人民共和国国家林业局.中国林业统计年鉴(2016)[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 2017.[The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China. China Forestry Yearbook2016[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House, 2017.]
    [28]李晓平,周定国,于艳春.利用生命周期评价法评价农作物秸秆人造板的环境特性[J].浙江农林大学学报, 2010, 27(2):210-216.[Li X P, Zhou D G, Yu Y C. Value environment characters of crop stalks based board with life cycle assessment[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2010, 27(2):210-216.]
    [29] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO).FAO’s Online Statistical Database[EB/OL].(2019-01-10)[2019-01-23]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO/visualize.
    [30] British Standards Institution(BSI). Publicly Available Specification 2050:2008 Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services[S]. London:BSI, 2008.
    [31] British Standards Institution(BSI). Publicly Available Specification 2050:2011 Specification for the Assessment of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Goods and Services[S]. London:BSI, 2011.
    [32] World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development(WRI/WBCSD). Product Life Cycle Accounting and Reporting Standard[S]. Washington DC:WRI/WBCSD, 2011.
    [33] International Organization for Standardization(ISO). ISO14067:Carbon Footprint of Product-Requirements and Guidelines for Quantification and Communication[S]. Geneva:ISO,2013.
    [34] Nakano K, Ando K, Takigawa M, et al. Life cycle assessment of wood-based boards produced in Japan and impact of formaldehyde emissions during the use stage[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23(4):957-969.
    [35] Wu P, Xia B, Wang X. The contribution of ISO 14067 to the evolution of global greenhouse gas standards:A review[J]. Renew?able and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 47:142-150.
    [36] European Commission. Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and Organizations:Recommendations, Rationale, and Alignment[R]. Ispra:Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2011.
    [37] Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, et al. Allocation in LCA of wood-based products[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002, 7(5):290-294.
    [38] FPInnovations. Product Category Rules(PCR)for Preparing an Environmental Product Declaration(EPD)for North American Structural and Architectural Wood Products[S]. Vancouver:FPInnovations, 2013.
    [39]中国林产工业协会.中国人造板产业报告(精简版)[J].林产工业, 2015, 42(11):5-15.[China National Forest Products Industry Association. China’s wood-based panel industry report(compact edition)[J]. China Forestry Products Industry, 2015, 42(11):5-15.]
    [40] Pandey D, Agrawal M, Pandey J S. Carbon footprint:Current methods of estimation[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assess?ment, 2011, 178(1-4):135-160.
    [41] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories[R]. Hayama:Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006.
    [42]时兰翠.木质材料加工过程碳储量变化研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2012.[Shi L C. Research on Carbon Sequestration Changes in the Processing Process of Wood Materials[D]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University, 2012.]
    [43]钱小瑜.我国纤维板生产的木材原料状况分析[J].中国人造板, 2009, 16(10):8-10.[Qian X Y. Situation of fiberboard raw material supply in China[J]. China Wood-based Panels, 2009, 16(10):8-10.]
    [44]张方文.定向刨花板生命周期评价(LCA)及环境影响评价研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2017.[Zhang F W. Research on Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment of Oriented Strand Board[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2017.]
    [45]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴(2017)[M].北京:中国统计出版社, 2018.[National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2017[M]. Beijing:China Statistics Press, 2018.]
    [46] González-García S, Berg S, Feijoo G, et al. Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood:Spanish and Swedish case studies[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14(4):340-353.
    [47]张运明.不同工艺生产脲醛胶的单位产品综合能耗分析[J].中国人造板, 2013, 20(8):12-13.[Zhang Y M. Comprehensive energy consumption analysis of UF resins prepared via different process[J]. China Wood-based Panels, 2013, 20(8):12-13.]
    [48]张雄智,王岩,魏辉煌,等.特定农产品碳足迹评价及碳标签制定的探索[J].中国农业大学学报, 2018,(1):188-196.[Zhang X Z, Wang Y, Wei H H, et al. Assessment of carbon footprint for a specific agricultural product and discussion of carbon label designing[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018,(1):188-196.]
    [49]刘夏璐,王洪涛,陈建,等.中国生命周期参考数据库的建立方法与基础模型[J].环境科学学报, 2010, 30(10):2136-2144.[Liu X L, Wang H T, Chen J, et al. Method and basic model for development of Chinese reference life cycle database of fundamental industries[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010, 30(10):2136-2144.]
    [50]中华人民共和国国家林业局. LY/T 1529-2012胶合板生产综合能耗[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2012.[The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Comprehensive Energy Consumption of Plywood Production[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2012.]
    [51] Athena Sustainable Material Institute(ASMI). A Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Medium Density Fiberboard(MDF):2013 Update[R]. Ottawa:Canadian Wood Council, 2013.
    [52] Rivela B, Ma T M, Feijoo G. Life cycle inventory of medium density fiberboard[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2007, 12(3):143-150.
    [53] Piekarski C M, de Francisco A C, Da L L, et al. Life cycle assessment of medium-density fiberboard(MDF)manufacturing process in Brazil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 575:103-111.
    [54] Puettmann M, Oneil E, Wilson J. Cradle to Gate Life Cycle Assessment of U. S. Medium Density Fiberboard Production[R].Washington:Final Report to the Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, 2013.
    [55] Wang S, Zhang H, Nie Y, et al. Contributions of China’s woodbased panels to CO2emission and removal implied by the energy consumption standards[J]. Forests, 2017, DOI:10.3390/f8080273.
    [56] Meil J, Bushi L, Garrahan P, et al. Status of Energy Use in the Canadian Wood Products Sector[R]. Vancouver:Canadian Industry Program for Energy Conservation, 2010.
    [57] Kaestner D. Life Cycle Assessment of the Oriented Strand Board and Plywood Industries in the United States of America[D].Knoxville:The University of Tennessee, 2015.
    [58] Kouchakipenchah H, Sharifi M, Mousazadeh H, et al. Life cycle assessment of medium-density fiberboard manufacturing process in Islamic Republic of Iran[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2016, 112:351-358.
    [59] Silva D A L, Lahr F A R, Garcia R P, et al. Life cycle assessment of medium density particleboard(MDP)produced in Brazil[J].International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18(7):1404-1411.
    [60]王丽,周贤武,王滋,等.基于生命周期评价的木质材料碳足迹分析[J].中国人造板, 2015, 22(6):7-10.[Wang L, Zhou X W,Wang Z, et al. Analysis of carbon footprint in wood materials based on life cycle assessment[J]. China Wood-Based Panels,2015, 22(6):7-10.]
    [61]胡广斌,肖小兵.我国中密度纤维板企业能耗水平分析[J].林产工业, 2012, 39(3):35-36.[Hu G B, Xiao X B. The energy consumption analysis of MDF production enterprises in China[J].China Forest Products Industry, 2012, 39(3):35-36.]
    [62]张方文,陈水龙,张海孝,等.定向刨花板生产过程的生命周期评价[J].木材工业, 2017, 31(3):31-34.[Zhang F W, Chen S L,Zhang H X, et al. Life cycle assessment of oriented strand board production[J]. China Wood Industry, 2017, 31(3):31-34.]
    [63] Smyth C, Rampley G, Lemprière T C, et al. Estimating product and energy substitution benefits in national scale mitigation analyses for Canada[J]. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2016, 9:1071-1084.
    [64]张南,李楠,刘一,等.生态设计家具的碳足迹核算与减排效果分析:以木质家具为例[J].生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7235-7243.[Zhang N, Li N, Liu Y, et al. Calculation of the carbon footprint of eco-design furniture and measures for its mitigation:A case study of wooden furniture[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22):7235-7243.]
    [65] Sandin G, Peters G M, Svanstr?m M. Life Cycle Assessment of Forest Products-Challenges and Solutions[M]. Cham:Springer,2016.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700