经济犯罪死刑规制的命运——从吴英案谈起
|
摘要
当前,我国经济犯罪死刑立法虽然日趋减少,但仍在少数罪名中保留。事实上,从性质上看,对经济犯罪适用死刑有违罪刑同质对应性原理;从经济学效率审视的视角看,对经济犯罪适用死刑也效果甚微;从刑罚目的上看,对经济犯罪适用死刑也无助于刑罚的一般预防。所以,要秉承对经济犯罪彻底废除死刑的立场,积极寻求更有效率的替代措施,强化自由刑、资格刑、财产刑,增加禁止令的适用,以便更有针对性地防控经济犯罪的发生。
At present,the death penalty legislation of economic crimes in China is decreasing,but it still remains in a few accusations.In fact,in nature,the application of death penalty to economic crimes violates the principle of homogeneous correspondence between crime and punishment;from the perspective of economic efficiency,the application of death penalty to economic crimes has little effect;from the perspective of penalty purpose,the application of death penalty to economic crimes is not conducive to the general prevention of penalty.Therefore,we shall uphold the standpoint of abolishing the death penalty completely for economic crimes,actively seek more efficient alternative measures,strengthen the penalties of freedom,qualification and property,and increase the application of prohibition order in order to prevent and control economic crimes more pertinently.
At present,the death penalty legislation of economic crimes in China is decreasing,but it still remains in a few accusations.In fact,in nature,the application of death penalty to economic crimes violates the principle of homogeneous correspondence between crime and punishment;from the perspective of economic efficiency,the application of death penalty to economic crimes has little effect;from the perspective of penalty purpose,the application of death penalty to economic crimes is not conducive to the general prevention of penalty.Therefore,we shall uphold the standpoint of abolishing the death penalty completely for economic crimes,actively seek more efficient alternative measures,strengthen the penalties of freedom,qualification and property,and increase the application of prohibition order in order to prevent and control economic crimes more pertinently.
引文
[1]徐海波,童伟华.经济犯罪刑罚配置的反思与重构—法经济学视域下的逻辑展开[J].学术交流,2017,(12):107-114.
[2]曾赛刚.民众对经济犯罪的死刑存废态度的实证研究[J].中外企业家,2017,(13):153-160.
[3]姚万勤.民间融资刑法规制的具体面相与趋势前瞻[J].金陵法律评论,2015,(2):144-165.
[4]沈海平.寻求有效率的惩罚—对犯罪刑罚问题的经济分析[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009.
[5]马克昌.近代西方刑法学说史略[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2004.
[6]王利宾.刑罚的经济分析[M].北京:法律出版社,2014.
[7]蔡荣.法经济学视野下刑罚体系的效益化改造[J].学术探索,2018,(5):110-117.
[8]闻志强.从业禁止刑法规定的理解与适用分析[J].北方法学,2018,(1):93-109.
(1)一般认为,狭义的经济犯罪指刑法分则第三章破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪;广义的经济犯罪还包括侵犯财产罪和贪污贿赂罪中的侵犯到社会主义市场经济秩序的若干罪名。
(2)某种意义上讲,吴英案也是导致《刑法修正案(九)》对绝大部分经济犯罪废除死刑的重要动因。
[2]曾赛刚.民众对经济犯罪的死刑存废态度的实证研究[J].中外企业家,2017,(13):153-160.
[3]姚万勤.民间融资刑法规制的具体面相与趋势前瞻[J].金陵法律评论,2015,(2):144-165.
[4]沈海平.寻求有效率的惩罚—对犯罪刑罚问题的经济分析[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009.
[5]马克昌.近代西方刑法学说史略[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2004.
[6]王利宾.刑罚的经济分析[M].北京:法律出版社,2014.
[7]蔡荣.法经济学视野下刑罚体系的效益化改造[J].学术探索,2018,(5):110-117.
[8]闻志强.从业禁止刑法规定的理解与适用分析[J].北方法学,2018,(1):93-109.
(1)一般认为,狭义的经济犯罪指刑法分则第三章破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪;广义的经济犯罪还包括侵犯财产罪和贪污贿赂罪中的侵犯到社会主义市场经济秩序的若干罪名。
(2)某种意义上讲,吴英案也是导致《刑法修正案(九)》对绝大部分经济犯罪废除死刑的重要动因。