一起交流滤波器保护误动引起直流极闭锁的故障分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Fault Analysis on DC Bipolar Blocking Caused by AC Filter Protection Malfunction
  • 作者:郭卫明 ; 黄华 ; 蔡国准 ; 梁秉岗
  • 英文作者:GUO Weiming;HUANG Hua;CAI Guozhun;LIANG Binggang;Guangzhou Bureau,CSG EHV Power Transmission Company;
  • 关键词:交流滤波器 ; 连线差动 ; 最后断路器 ; 交流站控 ; 直流极闭锁
  • 英文关键词:AC filter;;connection differential protection;;last breaker;;AC station control;;DC bipolar blocking
  • 中文刊名:GDDL
  • 英文刊名:Guangdong Electric Power
  • 机构:南方电网超高压输电公司广州局;
  • 出版日期:2017-01-25
  • 出版单位:广东电力
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.30;No.227
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GDDL201701024
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:44-1420/TM
  • 分类号:128-132
摘要
为解决大组交流滤波器连线差动保护动作引起直流极闭锁而导致直流传输功率降低的问题,结合一起大组滤波器连线差动保护动作情况以及交流站控制系统最后断路器逻辑,对大组交流滤波器连线差动保护动作引起直流极闭锁的原因进行分析,阐明大组交流滤波器保护装置采样通道故障是差动保护误动的原因,指出交流站控制系统点位配置错误是引起直流极闭锁的原因,为此,提出改用采集换流变进线电压和换流变进线避雷器的泄漏电流来评估换流器最后断路器已断开以及最后优化交流场最后断路器判断逻辑等优化措施,可大大改善直流输电的可靠性。
        In order to solve the problem of reduction of DC transmission power caused by DC bipolar blocking due to connection differential protection of AC filters(ACF),this paper analyzes reasons by combining one case of ACF connection differential protection and the last breaker logic of AC station control system.It states the reason for differential protection malfunction is fault of sampling channel of the ACF protection device and points out the reason for DC bipolar blocking is wrong configuration of AC station control point.Therefore,it proposes optimizing suggestions to improve reliability of DC power transmission such as using converter transformer primary voltage and leakage current of inlet arrestor of the converter transformer to evaluate break state of the last breaker,optimizing judging logic of the last breaker,and so on.
引文
[1]洪乐洲,毛海鹏,黄兆,等.交流滤波器大组过流保护设计缺陷与改进措施[J].电工技术,2014(8):56-58.HONG Lezhou,MAO Haipeng,HUANG Zhao,et al.Design Deficiency and Improvement Measures of the AC Filter Bank Overcurrent Protection[J].Electric Engineering,2014(8):56-58.
    [2]XJ-SIEMENS.Differential Protection Relay 7UT612 Manual V4.0,EB4.300.09-07.XS-0[R].Erlangen:SIEMENS,2006.
    [3]田庆.直流滤波器差动保护误动作分析[J].广东电力,2012,25(5):61–64.TIAN Qing.Analysis on Differential Protection Malfunction of DC Filter[J].Guangdong Electric Power,2012,25(5):61-64.
    [4]XJ-SIEMENS.SIPROTEC Bay Control Unit 6MD663/6MD664Manual V4.1,EB4.300.06-02.XS-0[R].Erlangen:SIEMENS,2006.
    [5]XJ-SIEMENS.AC Station Control(500 kV)System Information Manual,EB2.371.1.XS-0[R].Erlangen:SIEMENS,2006.
    [6]张婷,蒲永红.高压直流输电系统两种最后断路器跳闸保护比较[J].上海工程技术大学学报,2011,25(2):151–153.ZHANG Ting,PU Yonghong.Comparison Between Two Kinds of Last Breaker Trip Protection in HVDC System[J].Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science,2011,25(2):151-153.
    [7]于海,曾丽丽,杨亚璞,等.基于图论的特高压直流工程最后断路器自适应判断策略[J].电力系统自动化,2016,40(5):121–125.YU Hai,ZENG Lili,YANG Yapu,et al.Self-adaptive Strategy for the Last Breaker in UHVDC Project Based on Graph Theory[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2016,40(5):121-125.
    [8]邓洁清,项巍.武南变最后断路器保护装置内部逻辑分析及优化[J].电力自动化设备,2008,28(7):121–123.DENG Jieqing,XIANG Wei.Analysis and Optimization of Interior Logic for Final Breaker Protection[J].Electric Power Automation Equipment,2008,28(7):121-123.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700