福建黄泥田肥力质量特征与最小数据集
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Characteristics of soil fertility quality and minimum dataset for yellow-mud paddy fields in Fujian Province
  • 作者:王飞 ; 李清华 ; 林诚 ; 何春梅
  • 英文作者:WANG Fei;LI Qinghua;LIN Cheng;HE Chunmei;Institute of Soil and Fertilizer,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
  • 关键词:黄泥田 ; 土壤属性 ; 土壤质量评价 ; 最小数据集 ; 土壤肥力质量指数
  • 英文关键词:Yellow-mud paddy field;;Soil property;;Soil quality assessment;;Minimum data set (MDS);;Soil fertility quality index(SFQI)
  • 中文刊名:ZGTN
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
  • 机构:福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所;
  • 出版日期:2018-08-26 18:22
  • 出版单位:中国生态农业学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.26;No.170
  • 基金:省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项(2016R1021-2);; 国家绿肥产业技术体系(CARS-22-G-01);; 国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0200303);; 福建省农业科学院科技创新团队项目(STIT2017-1-9)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGTN201812012
  • 页数:11
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:13-1315/S
  • 分类号:97-107
摘要
黄泥田为福建省主要中低产田类型之一,约占水稻土面积的30%。为解析关键限制因子及开展黄泥田肥力质量评价,进而实施针对性的改良措施,采用配对采样方法,采集福建省20对典型黄泥田与邻近同一微地貌单元内高产灰泥田表层土壤,分析了两种土壤类型28项属性因子指标差异及其原因,并采用主成分分析等方法构建福建省黄泥田肥力质量评价因子最小数据集,通过加权指数法分别计算最小数据集土壤肥力质量指数与差异显著因子构成的重要数据集土壤肥力质量指数。结果表明,与灰泥田相比,黄泥田的有机质含量低19.1%,全氮、全磷、全钾含量分别低14.8%、29.9%和25.4%,碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾含量分别低17.8%、56.7%和39.3%,CEC、交换性钙、交换性镁含量分别低12.9%、50.6%和30.8%,有效铁、有效硼和有效锌含量分别低25.6%、33.3%和44.1%。黄泥田的物理性黏粒、<0.001 mm黏粒和容重分别较灰泥田高20.8%、25.6%和12.3%,而孔隙度低19.3%。黄泥田过氧化氢酶活性较灰泥田高20.4%,脲酶活性较灰泥田低40.4%。用主成分分析方法从上述19项有显著差异的因子构成的重要数据集中归纳出累计贡献率达76.22%并能反映黄泥田综合肥力特征的6个主成分,建立了由CEC、全钾、有效磷、有效硼和孔隙度5项因子组成的黄泥田肥力评价最小数据集,相应的黄泥田最小数据集土壤肥力质量指数仅相当于灰泥田的69.5%,通过与重要数据集的土壤肥力质量指数相关分析比较,最小数据集可代替重要数据集对福建省黄泥田土壤肥力质量进行正确评价。
        In modern agricultural production,the quality of soil fertility is crucial for the crop productivity.Yellow-mud paddy fields constitute one of the main types of medium-to-low yield fields in Fujian Province,which accounts for about 30% of paddy fields in the province.In order to determine key limiting factors,evaluate the quality of soil fertility and implement targeted improvement measures,28 soil characteristics of 20 pairs of typical surface soil samples from yellow-mud paddy fields and high-yield grey-mud fields in the neighboring and the same landscape units in Fujian Province were compared.Differences in soil properties between the two soils and the causes were systematically analyzed and the minimum data set(MDS) for assessment of the quality of soil fertility in yellow-mud paddy fields established using principal component analysis and other methods.Using the weighted index method,the soil fertility quality index(SFQI) from MDS and the important data set(IDS) constituted on the basis of significantly different factors.The results showed that compared with grey-mud paddy fields,the content of organic matter in yellow-mud paddy fields was less by 19.1% and the contents of total nitrogen,total phosphorus and total potassium were less respectively by 14.8%,29.9% and 25.4%.Also the contents of available nitrogen,available phosphorus and available potassium were less respectively by 17.8%,56.7% and 39.3%.CEC and the contents of exchangeable calcium,exchangeable magnesium were less respectively by 12.9%,50.6% and 30.8%.While the contents of available iron,available boron and available zinc were less respectively by 25.6%,33.3% and 44.1%,the contents of clay <0.001 mm and bulk density were higher by 20.8%,25.6% and 12.3%,whereas the porosity was less by 19.3%.Compared with grey-mud paddy fields,the activity of catalase in yellow-mud paddy fields was higher by 20.4%,but the activity of urease was less by 40.4%.This indicated that compared with high-producing fields,yellow-mud paddy fields belonged to low-fertility and short-acting soils with insufficient soil organic matter,total nutrients and available nutrients,low contents of macro/micro elements,CEC,etc.The above 19 soil characteristics with significant differences between the two soils constituted the IDS.Six principal components,with cumulative contribution of 76.22%,were selected from IDS reflecting the synthetic fertility properties of yellow-mud paddy fields.The final established MDS composed of five factors,including CEC,total potassium,available phosphorus,available boron and porosity for fertility quality assessment according to the expert experience and correlation analysis.The calculated SFQI from MDS of yellow-mud paddy fields was equivalent to 69.5% of that of grey-mud paddy fields.Correlation analysis on SFQI for IDS and MDS indicated that MDS could replace IDS and correctly used to evaluate soil fertility quality of yellow-mud paddy fields.Moreover,MDS could also be used in studies on how to improve soil fertility.
引文
[1]骆东奇,白洁,谢德体.论土壤肥力评价指标和方法[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(2):202-205LUO D Q,BAI J,XIE D T.Research on evaluation norm and method of soil fertility[J].Soil and Environmental Sciences,2002,11(2):202-205
    [2]福建省土壤普查办公室.福建土壤[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1991Soil Surveying Office in Fujian.Fujian Soil[M].Fuzhou:Fujian Science and Technology Press,1991
    [3]DORAN J W,PARKIN T B.Defining and assessing soil quality[M]//DORAN J W,COLEMAN D C,BEZDICEK D F,et al.Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment.Madison,Wisconsin:Soil Science Society of America Inc.,1994
    [4]KARLEN D L,MAUSBACH M J,DORAN J W,et al.Soil quality:A concept,definition,and framework for evaluation(A Guest Editorial)[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1997,61(1):4-10
    [5]王飞,李清华,林诚,等.福建冷浸田土壤质量评价因子的最小数据集[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(5):1461-1468WANG F,LI Q H,LIN C,et al.Establishing a minimum data set of soil quality assessment for cold-waterlogged paddy field in Fujian Province,China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(5):1461-1468
    [6]徐建明,张甘霖,谢正苗,等.土壤质量指标与评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2010XU J M,ZHANG G L,XIE Z M,et al.Indices and Assessment of Soil Quality[M].Beijing:Science Press,2010
    [7]曹志洪,周建民.中国土壤质量[M].北京:科学出版社,2008CAO Z H,ZHOU J M.Soil Quality of China[M].Beijing:Science Press,2008
    [8]贡璐,张雪妮,冉启洋.基于最小数据集的塔里木河上游绿洲土壤质量评价[J].土壤学报,2015,52(3):682-689GONG L,ZHANG X N,RAN Q Y.Quality assessment of Oasis soil in the upper reaches of TARIM river based on minimum data set[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2015,52(3):682-689
    [9]杨梅花,赵小敏,王芳东,等.基于主成分分析的最小数据集的肥力指数构建[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(6):1188-1195YANG M H,ZHAO X M,WANG F D,et al.Soil fertility index based on minimum data sets using PCA method[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2016,38(6):1188-1195
    [10]YAO R J,YANG J S,GAO P,et al.Determining minimum data set for soil quality assessment of typical salt-affected farmland in the coastal reclamation area[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2013,128:137-148
    [11]鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000LU R K.The Analytical Methods for Soil and Agrochemistry[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000
    [12]张国,曹志平,胡婵娟.土壤有机碳分组方法及其在农田生态系统研究中的应用[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(7):1921-1930ZHANG G,CAO Z P,HU C J.Soil organic carbon fractionation methods and their applications in farmland ecosystem research:A review[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,22(7):1921-1930
    [13]毛艳玲,杨玉盛,邢世和,等.土地利用变化对土壤水稳性团聚体轻组有机碳的影响[J].福建农林大学学报:自然科学版,2008,37(5):532-538MAO Y L,YANG Y S,XING S H,et al.Effects of land use change on light fractions of organic carbon in soil water-stable aggregates[J].Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University:Natural Science Edition,2008,37(5):532-538
    [14]LIEBIG M A,VARVEL G,DORAN J.A simple performancebased index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions[J].Agronomy Journal,2000,93(2):313-318
    [15]周卫.低产水稻土改良与管理:理论·方法·技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2015ZHOU W.Theories and Approaches of Amelioration and Management of Low Yield Paddy Soils[M].Beijing:Science Press,2015
    [16]丁洪,王跃思,项虹艳,等.福建省几种主要红壤性水稻土的硝化与反硝化活性[J].农业环境科学学报,2003,22(6):715-719DING H,WANG Y S,XIANG H Y,et al.Nitrification and denitrification potential in different types of paddy soils in Fujian Province[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2003,22(6):715-719
    [17]胡诚,刘东海,乔艳,等.不同施肥措施对黄泥田土壤养分及水稻产量的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2017,45(4):12-15HU C,LIU D H,QIAO Y,et al.Effects of different fertilization patterns on soil fertility and rice yield of yellow clayey paddy soil[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(4):12-15
    [18]宓文海,吴良欢,马庆旭,等.有机物料与化肥配施提高黄泥田水稻产量和土壤肥力[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(13):103-108MI W H,WU L H,MA Q X,et al.Combined application of organic materials and inorganic fertilizers improving rice yield and soil fertility of yellow clayey paddy soil[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2016,32(13):103-108
    [19]王飞,李清华,林诚,等.不同施肥模式对南方黄泥田耕层有机碳固存及生产力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2015,21(6):1447-1454WANG F,LI Q H,LIN C,et al.Effect of different fertilization modes on topsoil organic carbon sequestration and productivity in yellow paddy field of southern China[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2015,21(6):1447-1454
    [20]黄晶,张杨珠,高菊生,等.长期施肥下红壤性水稻土有机碳储量变化特[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(11):3373-3380HUANG J,ZHANG Y Z,GAO J S,et al.Variation characteristics of soil carbon sequestration under long-term different fertilization in red paddy soil[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(11):3373-3380
    [21]荣勤雷,梁国庆,周卫,等.不同有机肥对黄泥田土壤培肥效果及土壤酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(5):1168-1177RONG Q L,LIANG G Q,ZHOU W,et al.Effects of different organic fertilization on fertility and enzyme activities of yellow clayey soil[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2014,20(5):1168-1177
    [22]邢世和.福建耕地资源[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2003XING S H.Cropland Resources in Fujian[M].Xiamen:Xiamen University Press,2003
    [23]李桂林,陈杰,檀满枝,等.基于土地利用变化建立土壤质量评价最小数据集[J].土壤学报,2008,45(1):16-25LI G L,CHEN J,TAN M Z,et al.Establishment of a minimum dataset for soil quality assessment based on land use change[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2008,45(1):16-25
    [24]张光亮,白军红,郗敏,等.黄河三角洲湿地土壤质量综合评价[J].湿地科学,2015,13(6):744-751ZHANG G L,BAI J H,XI M,et al.Comprehensive assessment of soil quality of wetlands in the yellow river delta[J].Wetland Science,2015,13(6):744-751
    [25]黄婷,岳西杰,葛玺祖,等.基于主成分分析的黄土沟壑区土壤肥力质量评价--以长武县耕地土壤为例[J].干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(3):141-147HUANG T,YUE X J,GE X Z,et al.Evaluation of soil quality on gully region of loess plateau based on principal component analysis[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2010,28(3):141-147
    [26]沈汉,邹国元.菜地土壤评价中参评因素的选定与分级指标的划分[J].土壤通报,2004,35(5):553-557SHEN H,ZOU G Y.Parameters selection for evaluation of vegetable soil quality and its gradation[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2004,35(5):553-557
    [27]王建国,杨林章,单艳红.模糊数学在土壤质量评价中的应用研究[J].土壤学报,2001,38(2):176-183WANG J G,YANG L Z,SHAN Y H.Application of fuzzy mathematics to soil quality evaluation[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2001,38(2):176-183

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700