外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用及疗效探究
|
摘要
目的探究创伤骨科中外固定架的应用效果。方法选取96例在我院骨科中接受治疗的患者为研究对象,随机分为两组,采用常规切开复位内固定治疗的患者为对照组(48例),采用外固定架治疗的患者为试验组(48例),对比分析两组患者治疗效果。结果试验组患者在手术时间、术后并发症、愈合时间等方面明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在两组患者临床疗效的对比中,试验组治疗总有效率(91.67%)明显优于对照组(75.00%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在创伤骨科中应用外固定架治疗,其疗效显著,具有较高的安全性与可靠性,值得临床应用。
Objective To explore the application effect of the external fixator in orthopaedic trauma. Methods Ninetysix cases of patients treated in Orthopaedic Departmnet in our hospital were selected as the research objects, and randomly divided into two groups. The patients who were treated with conventional open reduction and internal fixation classified into control group(48 cases), while the patients treated with external fixator classified into experimental group(48 cases).The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared. Results The operation time, postoperative complications,the healing time of the experimental group were better than those of the control group, the differences were significant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of the experimental group was 91.67%, which was better than 75.00% of the control group,the difference was significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The external fixator in orthopaedic trauma treatment has distinct curative effect, with high safety and reliability, which is worth application.
Objective To explore the application effect of the external fixator in orthopaedic trauma. Methods Ninetysix cases of patients treated in Orthopaedic Departmnet in our hospital were selected as the research objects, and randomly divided into two groups. The patients who were treated with conventional open reduction and internal fixation classified into control group(48 cases), while the patients treated with external fixator classified into experimental group(48 cases).The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared. Results The operation time, postoperative complications,the healing time of the experimental group were better than those of the control group, the differences were significant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of the experimental group was 91.67%, which was better than 75.00% of the control group,the difference was significant(P <0.05). Conclusion The external fixator in orthopaedic trauma treatment has distinct curative effect, with high safety and reliability, which is worth application.
引文
[1]陈斌.重视外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用及疗效研究[J].中国创新医学,2014,8(13):27-29.
[2]秦国强,杨秋荟,仇志韬.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用和疗效研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(6):1230-1231.
[3]杨胜松,黄雷,滕星,等.外固定架辅助髓内钉技术治疗股骨畸形和股骨干骨折不愈合[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(5):526-533.
[4]宋斌.闭合复位外固定架固定术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的体会[J].河南外科学杂志,2013,19(4):245-246.
[5]杜旺民,郑木平,刘压杰,等.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(16):113-114.
[6]何勇齐.创伤骨科外固定架的应用体会[J].医学信息(中旬刊),2011,24(6):2352-2353.
[7]陈麒麟,朱乐全.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用及疗效研究[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(9):38-39.
[8]王满宜.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(12):1101-1103.
[9]李宗泽.外固定架在68例创伤骨科患者中的应用及疗效研究[J].中国社区医师:医学专业,2012,14(15):118.
[10]王文龙.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用与疗效研究[J].当代医学,2014,20(27):23-24.
[2]秦国强,杨秋荟,仇志韬.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用和疗效研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2013,24(6):1230-1231.
[3]杨胜松,黄雷,滕星,等.外固定架辅助髓内钉技术治疗股骨畸形和股骨干骨折不愈合[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(5):526-533.
[4]宋斌.闭合复位外固定架固定术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的体会[J].河南外科学杂志,2013,19(4):245-246.
[5]杜旺民,郑木平,刘压杰,等.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(16):113-114.
[6]何勇齐.创伤骨科外固定架的应用体会[J].医学信息(中旬刊),2011,24(6):2352-2353.
[7]陈麒麟,朱乐全.外固定架在创伤骨科患者中的应用及疗效研究[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(9):38-39.
[8]王满宜.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2007,9(12):1101-1103.
[9]李宗泽.外固定架在68例创伤骨科患者中的应用及疗效研究[J].中国社区医师:医学专业,2012,14(15):118.
[10]王文龙.外固定架在创伤骨科中的应用与疗效研究[J].当代医学,2014,20(27):23-24.